More Tales from the Tolerance Thugs

OK, it is now official. It has been a close contest, but I think a winner can be announced here – even if just by a whisker. There are many contenders for the Tolerance Brigade of the Year Award. Plenty of groups come to mind. You know the ones: they scream the loudest about tolerance, acceptance and diversity, yet are the most intolerant, unaccepting, and resistant to genuine diversity.

And the winner of course is the militant homosexualists. I have reported plenty of examples already of homofascism in operation. My new book will feature heaps more of these. In the meantime we have our daily roundup of the gaystapo in action.

Let me start with the thing that drives the militants into a frenzied lather: ex-homosexuals. They hate these folks more than anyone on the planet because they give lie to the myth of ‘being born that way’. So many folks have been set free from the homosexual deathstyle, and the militants just hate these folks.

Consider Michael Glatze, who was released from his dead-end lifestyle. I have previously written up his wonderful testimony:

Well, he has married – a woman, and the activists are screaming at the top of their lungs – all in the name of tolerance of course. Says one story: “A former ‘gay rights’ activist who declared six years ago he left homosexuality through the power of God is now celebrating his marriage to a woman, much to the chagrin of homosexual activists who are ridiculing him and his bride via the Web.

“In a letter to his critics published today by WND, Michael Glatze called the month since his Oct. 26 marriage to Rebekah the ‘greatest’ of his life. ‘I am so grateful for Rebekah, for God, for His provision, for my new in-laws, for my family which traveled from far and wide to join in our special day, and for the prayers and support that have flooded our way since October,’ he writes.”

But that has got the militants spitting chips, and a number of examples of this are given. Peter LaBarbera, president of Americans for Truth about Homosexuality replied: “The reaction of Besen and other activists boils down to an inhuman hope for failure. In what other area of life do you see this? Somebody tries to overcome drugs and falls back, and you say, ‘That’s it, nobody can change.’

The only people “who are not celebrating this marriage of a guy who was once involved in homosexuality are the homosexual radicals like Wayne Besen. They are basically celebrating failure. They’re all about focusing on the failures, because they can’t admit that homosexual identity and behavior is something you can change.”

In the meantime, the thought police and tolerance thugs continue their war against dissenters. Consider this example from Colorado: “On Friday, Denver administrative law judge Robert Spence released a ruling that forces Jack Phillips, the owner of Masterpiece Cakeshop, to either make a wedding cake for two homosexual men who requested one or face fines and possible jail time.”

There it is: you will violate your conscience and become a promoter of homosexuality and political correctness, or the State will punish you big time. That is exactly where the West is heading – a homosexualist police state. As Al Maurer comments: “Forget the Christian beliefs of Phillips. Spence should have stopped his ruling at first blush. He said very directly that private businesses should not be able to refuse service to anyone — period.

“Better take down those ‘No shirt, no shoes, no service’ signs. This ruling and the laws behind it strike directly at the heart of American entrepreneurship. Imagine the cases: I go into a Ford dealership and sue because they will not sell me a Jaguar. If Phillips can be made to sell a cake he doesn’t want to, why can’t a Ford dealer be forced to sell a Jaguar? Or a Wiccan sues a Christian bookstore for not selling her a book on satanic practice. Can a tattoo artist do crosses and not pentagrams?

“Up until this point in America, anyone could set up any kind of business they wanted to and focus on any customer group they chose. Even though that right is now threatened, Phillips is not defending his actions on that ground. He simply defends his right to practice his religion as he sees it. We have seen this kind of circumscribing of religious practice before. In Nazi Germany, it was argued that religion was a private matter and was subordinate to the rules of the state. That didn’t end well.”

And while the US is treating Christians as criminals, it is treating sexual perverts as heroes. Check out this shocking story of a pervert honoured with a US postage stamp: “What would you call a 33-year-old man who both had and axiomatically acted upon a deviant sexual appetite for underage, drug-addicted, runaway boys? (No, not Jerry Sandusky.)

“What would you call a man of whom, as regards sexual preference, his own friend and biographer confessed, ‘Harvey always had a penchant for young waifs with substance abuse problems’? In a recent interview with, I called this man ‘demonstrably, categorically an evil man based on his [statutory] rape of teenage boys.’ But you can call him Harvey Milk.

“Harvey Milk’s only claim to fame is that he was the first openly homosexual candidate to be elected to public office (San Francisco city commissioner). His chief cause was to do away with the Judeo-Christian sexual ethic. In 1978 Milk was murdered over a non-related political dispute by fellow Democrat Dan White. And a ‘progressive’ martyr was born.”

Things are no better here in Australia. Not all that long ago a homosexual couple bought a toddler from Russia (yes, bought). For this “our” ABC did a hagiographic piece on the couple, praising them to the hilt. Turns out however they only bought him to sell him to international child sex abuse rings. I discussed this utterly gruesome and horrific story elsewhere:

Well at least there is a little bit of good news here. The pair have been handed lengthy prison sentences. “A Queensland man who trafficked his adopted son to an international paedophile network has been sentenced to 30 years in jail by a US court.

“Peter Truong and his partner Mark Newton bought the child, who the ABC will call Boy 1, for around $8,000 from Russia in 2005. His birth papers were falsified to list Newton as his biological father, paving the way for Boy 1 to be adopted and brought to Queensland.

“Police say the pair allowed at least eight men in several different countries, including Australia, the US, Germany and France, to molest the boy when he was between two and six years old. . . . Newton had earlier been sentenced to 40 years in jail for his crimes.”

Of course this is a crystal clear case for why we need the death penalty. These demonic creatures do not deserve mere prison sentences, considering what they inflicted on this poor little boy. And if they were to only get prison, they should have been locked up for life, with the key thrown away. Oh, and they of course should be castrated as well.

But stay tuned – tomorrow will be another day, and we will have plenty more stories of the tolerance brigade in action.

[1229 words]