This is another passage that may not seem all that difficult to understand, but it can be misused and abused. Let me give it to you in context. Jesus is telling his disciples that he will soon be going away, but he will not leave them as orphans. The Holy Spirit will be given them. John 16:12-14 says this:
“I still have many things to say to you, but you cannot bear them now. When the Spirit of truth comes, he will guide you into all the truth, for he will not speak on his own authority, but whatever he hears he will speak, and he will declare to you the things that are to come. He will glorify me, for he will take what is mine and declare it to you.”
I want to focus on this promise of being guided into all truth. This is a wonderful promise indeed, but does it mean what some think it means, that we can have perfect and infallible understanding of all things when the Spirit comes? Hopefully most Christians understand what this verse is NOT saying: it is not saying when we become a Christian and receive the Holy Spirit, we have total and foolproof knowledge of everything.
When we do come to Christ, we do not all of a sudden become a world-class nuclear physicist. Those who want that outcome will have to study long and hard – for many years. We do not all of a sudden know everything there is to know about the design, construction and playing of a harpsichord. That too will take years of learning and practice.
But maybe Christians think we will have perfect biblical understanding. But even here we know this is not the case. If it were, then there would be no need for teachers and preachers and teaching and preaching. If we just get zapped directly by God into complete understanding of all spiritual truth, then the need for teachers would be redundant.
We grow as Christians after we get saved, and that includes growing in our understanding and knowledge. In this fallen world our knowledge will always be partial and imperfect. As the Apostle Paul says in 1 Corinthians 13:12: “For now we see through a glass, darkly” (KJV). Or as the NLT puts it, “Now we see things imperfectly”.
Because we are all fallen and finite, we of course cannot see everything perfectly. We all have imperfect vision, perception, understanding, insight and awareness. Becoming a Christian does not mean all of our shortcomings and imperfections instantly disappear. We still have all sorts of biases and prejudices and ways of looking at things which may be far from how things really are.
And that includes how we view and understand Scripture. While the Word of God is perfect, authoritative and infallible, we are not. Let me offer a quick analogy. Suppose you are given a brand new, expensive and fancy private jet. You get in and seek to pilot it. You somehow manage to get it off the ground, but you soon crash it.
Now the plane itself was perfect – or at least pretty close to perfect. But you were not perfect as the pilot – nowhere near. So it was not the plane’s fault but your fault that things went so very wrong. It is sort of like that with the Word of God. It is perfect but we are simply fallen and finite readers and interpreters of it.
So at the very least we need humility and a teachable spirit. We do not know everything about the Bible, nor do we know it all infallibly. Yes, the promise of the Spirit coming to guide us into truth is a wonderful promise. But as mentioned, if that meant we would have perfect, instant knowledge and understanding, then the need for teachers and the like would be a waste of time, and God made a mistake giving them to the body of Christ.
But at this point let me draw upon a few commentators on this passage. D. A. Carson put it this way: “The notion of ‘guidance’ in all truth has nothing to do with privileged information pertaining to one’s choice of vocation or mate, but with understanding God as he has revealed himself, and with obeying his revelation.”
Or as Colin Kruse comments: “This is not to be interpreted absolutely as if the Counsellor will teach them all that can be known, but rather that he will interpret to them afterwards the truth about the death, resurrection and exaltation of Jesus. His role is to testify to Jesus … As Jesus did not speak independently of the Father, so the Counsellor will not speak independently of Jesus.”
John: An Introduction and Commentary (Volume 4) (Tyndale New Testament Commentaries)by Kruse, Colin G. (Author)
And J. Ramsey Michaels says this:
Such a phrase, taken out of context, could refer to all the philosophical or scientific truth of the universe, but here Jesus focuses specifically on truth that he says is ‘mine.’ Jesus can speak of his truth as ‘all truth’ because ‘all that belongs to the Father is mine’ (v. 15; cf. 17:10). Everything the Spirit reveals comes from the Father and therefore from Jesus. The accent is not on what human beings can learn anyway by rational inquiry or by the use of their five senses but on the ‘much more’ (v. 12) that Jesus would like to tell the disciples, but cannot, about their life and mission in the world. The teaching ministry of the Spirit builds on and develops the teaching ministry of Jesus himself.
Lastly, James Montgomery Boice might be right to emphasise that this passage could be a specific word to the disciples, and it may well have to do with the bringing about of the New Testament. He writes:
It is not just into some general idea of truth that the Holy Spirit is said to be coming to guide the apostles, but rather into all “the truth,” that is, into a definite body of material centering on Christ. This, we recognize, is nothing other than the New Testament. So the promise is that the Holy Spirit would be the vehicle of a new revelation through those specifically commissioned to this ministry. The Revised Standard Version and the New English Bible render this verse correctly…
This is not a promise of inspiration that is made generally to all Christians in all periods of the church. . . . As you study the Bible the Holy Spirit will continue to do the work he began in an authoritative way with the inspiration of the New Testament documents. The Holy Spirit, the true author of these books, will lead you to see the Lord Jesus Christ and bring you to the point of increasing obedience and service to him.
Whether this is indeed mainly a reference to the writing of the New Testament is possible. But my main point stands regardless. The intention of John was not to say that with the Holy Spirit all believers will have all correct and complete knowledge and never see through a glass darkly anymore.
We will still get things wrong, we will still be mistaken in our understanding and interpretation, and we will still need to remain humble as we rely on the teachers Christ has raised up for the body. Some 16 years ago I penned a piece offering 20 reasons why study and theology are important. Here are two of them:
Six. If everything is so clear and easy to understand, why does Scripture say that we should study to show ourselves approved? (2 Tim. 2:15) Presumably if we do not study, we will not earn God’s approval, at least in this regard. And the importance of study is mentioned elsewhere. We are informed that the Bereans were more noble than the Thessalonians because they studied the Scriptures daily, to see if what Paul said was true (Acts 17:11).
Seven. No one has a direct pipeline to God via the Holy Spirit. We need each other. We are all members of one body and we rely on each other as Paul instructs us in 1 Cor. 14 and 15. None of us has all the truth. We can learn from others. Protestants in general, and Pentecostals in particular, need to overcome their rugged individualism, and see the importance of the Christian community. Yes we can directly commune with God and have direct access to the truths of Scripture. But God has designed us to live, grow and flourish in a body. We are incomplete without each other. And that is true of our understanding of Scripture as well. https://billmuehlenberg.com/2006/09/26/in-defence-of-theology/
In sum, there are two extremes that believers must avoid when it comes to the knowledge of God and his truth:
-Because we are all fallen and finite, none of us have all the truth, perfect understanding, nor infallible thinking. We see through a glass darkly. Knowing that should keep us from pride and presumption.
-Because we are guided by God’s word and his Spirit, we can have a high degree of certainty and confidence about who God is and what he wants of us. Knowing that should keep us from despair and cynicism.
5 Replies to “Difficult Bible Passages: John 16:13”
Shouldn’t consideration be given to the means by which we study Scripture incorporating the laws of reason, logic etc to read increasingly responsibly. Isaiah reminds us to “let us reason together” to ultimately avoid sin (doing bad) this to do the good works that He has prepared us to do.
Then we must deal with the the proliferation of speculative theologies and the “cherry picking” of experts who believe too much is too little or modern gnostics for whom the Mysteries of God should not exist but be reduced to fact and data.
In closing, your commentaries I trust to be faithful to the Word as I verify to the best of my limited understanding within the scope of my moderate realism. To be certain the world needs the pragmatic theology you offer daily to reason together to avoid error.
Thanks AF.
Amen!
My view is that there is a threefold way to get things right as demonstrated by Jesus and His disciples and this means believing the scriptures but having them taught correctly by a teacher who knows the truth and then receiving God’s Spirit; that is being born from above. Even then we will get things wrong because being lead by the Spirit only works when you are willing to be lead and we have no perfect human teachers today and our translations are not perfect either. Moses giving in about divorce, John the Baptist languishing in prison and questioning Jesus’ annointing and the circumcision kerfuffle etc. etc. all demonstrate clearly that even the best, most Spirit lead humans get it wrong.
Thankfully God’s love covers a multitude of sins. He knows our heart and we can rest in that knowledge. Love of the Truth does not mean we have obtained all Truth – just that, in faith, we love Truth and so strive to obtain Truth because He is loved by us.
As to point seven above I call myself a protestant for two reasons: 1) to show I don’t follow the Pope and his edicts; and 2) there are rituals and beliefs in Catholicism I find unbiblical and therefore wish to distance myself from. I actually have no problem with Catholics in fact a great deal of my extended family is Catholic but I wish to make the distinction solely because of the two reasons above. I have books by Catholics my position is if you have the truth I’ll listen. I would fellowship with Catholics would my health allow me to leave the house without getting migraines. My litmus test is are you following the biblical Jesus or a different Jesus and do you stick to the Bible or add to it. (I don’t mind showing a interest in say the book of Enoch or some Apocryphal literature as long as you don’t hold it as equal to the Bible because there has never been any proof they were. JR Church did a great multi part study of the book of Enoch but even so we still don’t know so we can’t hold it as authoritative. Do you have anything on Enoch Bill???)
Thank-you for the good insights comparing the literal with the more general sense.
However, I would like to investigate a further sense of truth in this context, which is that of “truth versus lies”. Most certainly it has direct reference with Jesus calling the Pharisees effectively, “children of the father of lies”.
So, another application would be “the Spirit leading us into all truth”, as His ministry in answer to us being serially beset with lies in our walk.
Sounds like the gift of discernment; but is a more general one in that it is a promise to all believers, we will not be at loss in understanding God’s point of view on a given matter.
Which begs a question: Which “given matter”?
Certainly what can be called “the things of God” to state in brief; but further?
Here I think of the ‘father of lies’, again; and, which lies? Just spiritual ones? I think Satan would use *any* lie to further his means, being he came to “steal, kill, and destroy”.
So here it appears that Jesus’ promise to send the Spirit can be interpreted to mean assisting our mind, soul and spirit as we combat any lie we encounter.
I have drawn great comfort and inspiration from this in these times of increased blatant falsehoods!
Thanks again for your work!
Eddie
Shouldn’t consideration be given to the means by which we study Scripture incorporating the laws of reason, logic etc to read increasingly responsibly. Isaiah reminds us to “let us reason together” to ultimately avoid sin (doing bad) this to do the good works that He has prepared us to do.
Then we must deal with the the proliferation of speculative theologies and the “cherry picking” of experts who believe too much is too little or modern gnostics for whom the Mysteries of God should not exist but be reduced to fact and data.
In closing, your commentaries I trust to be faithful to the Word as I verify to the best of my limited understanding within the scope of my moderate realism. To be certain the world needs the pragmatic theology you offer daily to reason together to avoid error.
Thanks AF.
Amen!
My view is that there is a threefold way to get things right as demonstrated by Jesus and His disciples and this means believing the scriptures but having them taught correctly by a teacher who knows the truth and then receiving God’s Spirit; that is being born from above. Even then we will get things wrong because being lead by the Spirit only works when you are willing to be lead and we have no perfect human teachers today and our translations are not perfect either. Moses giving in about divorce, John the Baptist languishing in prison and questioning Jesus’ annointing and the circumcision kerfuffle etc. etc. all demonstrate clearly that even the best, most Spirit lead humans get it wrong.
Thankfully God’s love covers a multitude of sins. He knows our heart and we can rest in that knowledge. Love of the Truth does not mean we have obtained all Truth – just that, in faith, we love Truth and so strive to obtain Truth because He is loved by us.
As to point seven above I call myself a protestant for two reasons: 1) to show I don’t follow the Pope and his edicts; and 2) there are rituals and beliefs in Catholicism I find unbiblical and therefore wish to distance myself from. I actually have no problem with Catholics in fact a great deal of my extended family is Catholic but I wish to make the distinction solely because of the two reasons above. I have books by Catholics my position is if you have the truth I’ll listen. I would fellowship with Catholics would my health allow me to leave the house without getting migraines. My litmus test is are you following the biblical Jesus or a different Jesus and do you stick to the Bible or add to it. (I don’t mind showing a interest in say the book of Enoch or some Apocryphal literature as long as you don’t hold it as equal to the Bible because there has never been any proof they were. JR Church did a great multi part study of the book of Enoch but even so we still don’t know so we can’t hold it as authoritative. Do you have anything on Enoch Bill???)
Thank-you for the good insights comparing the literal with the more general sense.
However, I would like to investigate a further sense of truth in this context, which is that of “truth versus lies”. Most certainly it has direct reference with Jesus calling the Pharisees effectively, “children of the father of lies”.
So, another application would be “the Spirit leading us into all truth”, as His ministry in answer to us being serially beset with lies in our walk.
Sounds like the gift of discernment; but is a more general one in that it is a promise to all believers, we will not be at loss in understanding God’s point of view on a given matter.
Which begs a question: Which “given matter”?
Certainly what can be called “the things of God” to state in brief; but further?
Here I think of the ‘father of lies’, again; and, which lies? Just spiritual ones? I think Satan would use *any* lie to further his means, being he came to “steal, kill, and destroy”.
So here it appears that Jesus’ promise to send the Spirit can be interpreted to mean assisting our mind, soul and spirit as we combat any lie we encounter.
I have drawn great comfort and inspiration from this in these times of increased blatant falsehoods!
Thanks again for your work!
Eddie