Why Doesn’t God Do Something? Part Two

The problem of evil is perhaps the most significant and universal moral and philosophical puzzle there is. The world’s great minds and the world’s great religions have all attempted to grapple with it. In the first part of this article I discussed several points which can be offered on this topic by those coming from the Judeo-Christian worldview.

I noted how one correspondent raised this issue with me. So let me go back to the original syllogism concerning the deductive (logical) problem of evil. While appearing in many forms, the basic (atheistic) formulation usually goes something like this:

1   God is all-loving.
2   God is all-powerful.
3   Suffering exists.
4   If God is all powerful he could stop suffering.
5   If he is all loving he wouldn’t allow suffering.
6   So God is either not all powerful or not all loving or both.

But other important premises, dealing with such things as timing, can and should be factored into all this. Thus a more sensible and accurate syllogism might be this:

1  Since God is all-good, He has the will to defeat evil.
2  Since God is all powerful, He has the power to defeat evil.
3  Evil is not yet defeated.
4  Therefore, evil will one day be defeated.

That is certainly the biblical view. God dealt decisively with the problem of evil and suffering at Calvary 2000 years ago. He broke the power of sin and death, and those who come to him can experience newness of life, and a radical transformation. And when Christ comes again all evil will finally be judged and dealt with.

So the reality of evil today does not entail that God is either lacking in power or lacking in love. And most people do not mind so much what might be called deserved evil. Hitler deserved any punishment he might have gotten.  And folks who smoke three packs a day will likely get lung cancer. Thus much suffering is cause and effect orientated: if we do bad or harmful things, there will be consequences, and we will have to pay the price.

But what worries most people is gratuitous or seemingly meaningless suffering. But the theist here would reply by saying that we simply do not have enough information to know that all – or in fact any – evil is completely gratuitous. If there is an all-wise and all-loving God, he may have very good reasons why he allows various cases of suffering.

Any parent who loves his or her children knows this. Sometimes the most loving thing a parent can do appears to the child as cruel and meaningless. Removing a splinter from a toddler is the most loving thing a parent can do, while the toddler may think it is a form of torture and cruelty. So in terms of another syllogism, the atheist might put it this way:

1  If God exists, he wouldn’t allow pointless evil
2  Pointless evil exists
3  Therefore God does not exist

But the theist could turn it around and put it this way

1  If God exists, he wouldn’t allow pointless evil
2  God exists
3  Therefore, pointless evil doesn’t exist

We may not have all the answers for any given particular case of evil or suffering, but God may well have sufficient and suitable reasons. So if he is indeed a good God, a wise God, and a loving God, we can entrust some of these questions and mysteries to him. He is too loving to be unkind, and too wise to make a mistake.

As to the deductive argument of evil, the consensus in philosophical circles today is that there is no strong compelling argument to suggest that the presence of evil in the world is sufficient to question the existence of a good and loving God. The two can indeed be compatible.

Yet people will still ask, why do the innocent suffer? Rabbi Harold Kushner wrote a book in 1981 called When Bad Things Happen to Good People. Christians believe he got the title wrong; it should have been: When Good Things Happen to Bad People. We are all bad, evil, selfish and tainted with sin.

The wonder is why God blesses us and is good to us anyway. The truth is, no one is innocent. We are all sinners, fixated on self, and deserving of our fate. But the only truly innocent person, Jesus Christ, did not remain aloof from our suffering, but in fact embraced it fully. By dying a cruel death on a cross as our substitute, taking upon himself the penalty we deserve, he has not only dealt with the sin and suffering question, but makes a way for us to overcome.

So even though I, or you, or anyone, may not have specific answers as to why this or that particular tragedy happened, we do, at least as believers, have a much bigger and more helpful set of answers. God is not immune or unconcerned about our suffering.

He was so concerned about it that he gave up the comforts of heaven, entered into our world, and took our place in a horrific death, that the problems of evil and suffering could finally be overcome. The first instalment of this took place when he walked the earth long ago, and the final instalment comes when he returns a second time to put all things right, judge all evil, and acknowledge all good.

So the first and most important thing any person can do who is concerned about evil and suffering is to agree with God about our predicament, and join with him as he seeks to bring resolution and closure to it. First we need to let him deal with the resident evil in each human heart. Then we can seek to be a force for good in the world, dealing with suffering in its various forms.

And over the centuries the Christian church has been just that – a tremendous force for good in the world, as Christians immersed themselves in human suffering, setting up hospitals, building schools, working with AIDS patients, fighting injustice, challenging slavery, helping women and children, and so on.

In closing it of course needs to be pointed out that I have not even begun to scratch the surface of what are amongst the most complex, intractable and difficult questions we can ask about human existence. But my commentator asked me a pointed question, so I have endeavoured to produce at least a start to the Christian response.

If the question was indeed an honest question, I have attempted an honest answer. But given the millions of gallons of ink already spilled on this topic over the centuries, a short article here can hardly do the topic proper justice. But what I present here is part of the answer someone from the Judeo-Christian worldview would offer.

Much more needs to be said, and I am happy to take this further for those with honest queries looking for some answers and direction here. If nothing else, I may list some helpful books on this topic. Maybe another article will provide such a list. But for now I hope this two-part article at least offers some possible solutions and answers, as partial and imperfect as they may be.

Part One of this article is here: https://billmuehlenberg.com/2011/09/21/why-doesn%E2%80%99t-god-do-something-part-one/

[1214 words]

7 Replies to “Why Doesn’t God Do Something? Part Two”

  1. I like this reasoning:

    1 If God exists, he wouldn’t allow pointless evil
    2 God exists
    3 Therefore, pointless evil doesn’t exist

    By putting God first (compare the athiest’s list), we have a better chance of making sense of evil & this world.

    If we look at God through our circumstances we end up with the wrong conclusions. We must look at God and affirm in our minds who he is – then look at the circumstances through that lens.

    David Keen

  2. The problem with the first six point list is point 5. ‘If he is all loving he wouldn’t allow suffering.’ It is at this point that the questioner has inserted their knowledge over God’s. Their judgment is that He wouldn’t allow suffering if He was all loving. But He is all loving, and He does allow it – this can clearly be ascertained from Scripture.
    One needs to toss out one’s own judgment and accept God’s judgment, to do less is unbelief. It is only from this position of faith in Him that more fruitful consideration of the suffering itself might then take place.

    Isaac Overton

  3. I thank you Bill for these two articles. They have armed me with some responses when I am confronted with these sometimes seemingly impossible to answer questions. It will be good to have answers to those who are really intent on mischief rather than actually seeking information, and who knows, these answers may even sow the seeds of truth and belief in the unbeliever.
    God bless!

    Joan Davidson

  4. I find the most profitable line of “argument” is to turn the argument on its head, much along the lines of the book title. Rather than ask “Why does a good God allow suffering?”, ask “Why does a good God put up with rebellion and evil?”. Once we free ourselves from delusions of innocence and place the focus of evil on us rather than external forces, we are ready to talk about grace.

    Note: I am not claiming that God does not cause suffering. God is sovereign, so all suffering in this world ultimately comes from God, whether through human agency or not. The more important question is whether such suffering is unjust. We must understand that non-fatal suffering is a temporary injustice, because God’s leniency is less than we deserve.

    Thanks be to God, who gives such mercy to his enemies.

    Andrew White

  5. I may be accused of hair splitting, but I can not see that God causes suffering, though he allows it. If a parent wars a child not to go on the road because a car might come and run it over, if the child then disobeys and gets run over by a car, would we say the parent has caused the suffering?
    2 things that always help me to persevere
    1 evil is a tool for good in God’s hand, so when I am really mad at the devil, I tell him that God will use him to bring good for people until he has served his purpose and will be thrown into the lake of fire.
    2 sin always hurts the innocent. David’s sin caused the death of Uriah and his son as well as Bathsheba’s disgrace. Therefore, the innocent suffer not because of God’s carelessness, forgetfulness or lack of power, but as a result of the sin that entered into the world through Adam’s disobedience and every subsequent sin committed. It’s rather like a snow ball effect and I totally agree with you Bill that unless God in His mercy had prevented many disasters, I rather think, humanity and this planet would not exist any more.
    Thanks for these 2 very helpful articles Bill, I will print them and have them ready to give to people, should the opportunity arise -0\- and it usually does.
    Many blessings
    Ursula Bennett

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *