When Evil Is Championed
Evil has always been around. It used to be called sin, but it has always been with us, and for most of human history people were able to recognise it and for the most part acknowledge that it is evil. Sure, everyone sinned and did evil, but until recently most people knew that sin was sin.
Consider sexual sin. Not all that long ago one could be a fornicator or an adulterer or promiscuous or consumed by lust, and so on, but most people at least knew this was not right and it was not something to glibly make excuses for. People may have committed all these sins back then, but they usually still knew that they were sins.
Consider the old work of fiction, The Scarlet Letter. In the 1850 novel by Nathaniel Hawthorne a young woman has been found guilty of adultery and is forced to wear a scarlet A on her dress, and paraded publicly, as a sign of shame. The very notion of such a thing occurring today of course would be unheard of.
Not only is adultery as common as breathing, but the very sense of shame and remorse which used to accompany such sexual sins has all but disappeared as well. We don’t feel shame about anything nowadays. We not only do not consider sin to be sin any more, but we are happy to sin with impunity.
We are utterly shameless and devoid of any sense of actual sin. After all, we have been told for decades now that there is no such thing as sin – even from many of our pulpits. We are told there is no such thing as guilt – only guilt feelings which we can easily deal with and dismiss.
We not only sin and sin freely, but now we champion sin, promote sin, celebrate sin, and encourage sin. And this is happening from the highest levels. We now have governments championing all forms of sexual deviancy, all in the name of tolerance and diversity.
We have moved from prohibiting many sins to permitting them to promoting them. Homosexuality is an obvious candidate here. The only bad guys today are those who resist the homosexual onslaught. The only evil people today are those who refuse to give up on sexual morality and purity.
The real culprits today are those who refuse to promote and endorse sinful lifestyles. They have become the new objects of public scorn. Soon enough they will be forced to wear an H on their clothing, or stamped on their foreheads, for “homophobia”.
Instead of having shame for the evil people do, they now expect you to get on board with them and celebrate their sin. If you don’t you become the sinner – you are the one who must be singled out and punished. One could easily see a novel being written like that of Hawthorne’s.
Imagine a crowd of angry homosexuals and their supporters parading through the streets a recalcitrant lover of righteousness and truth. He is put on public display and pelted with rotten tomatoes and rocks. The masses become more and more incensed at this person who dares to resist the militant’s agenda.
Branding his hands with the letter H with hot irons is not deemed to be sufficient punishment. He must be made an example of. ‘Off with his head’ the crowds chant. ‘We will not tolerate such intolerance in our community. He must not be allowed to push his intolerance anymore.’
The only sad thing about this scenario is that it is not far off at all. Every day lesser episodes of this are occurring. I have documented hundreds of cases not all dissimilar to this. Indeed, not all that long ago I actually had to run the gauntlet of angry, screaming protestors.
I simply wanted to speak at a meeting at a church and defend the notion that marriage is between a man and a woman. For daring to argue such a “hateful” and “intolerant” position the militants were out in force, intent on shutting the meeting down.
The only reason it went ahead was because of a security force which had to be hired at great expense, along with the police. Indeed, the riot squad was also on standby. Did you get that? Today we have sunk so low that to actually seek to publicly defend marriage and family will arouse the demonic ire of the militants. They will come out to get you.
Freedom and democracy is being taken away from us, right under our noses. And all this activism and militancy is being boldly, brashly and proudly carried out. These folks exult in their sin and endorse it publicly at every opportunity. Thus we have regular sin pride marches. Sure they are given euphemistic names, but that is what it is.
We even celebrate the sodomisation of the Boy Scouts of America. We applaud it and promote it, and treat as bigots those who dare to stand up for the wellbeing of these young boys. We treat virtue as vice, and vice as virtue. Sin is applauded while goodness is denigrated.
G. K. Chesterton, as always, had much to say about such matters. Let me just present two of his insights here:
“Men do not differ much about what things they call evils; they differ enormously about what evils they will call excusable.”
“Unless a man becomes the enemy of an evil, he will not even become its slave but rather its champion.”
Of course GKC is simply reflecting the wisdom and sanity of the Judeo-Christian worldview. As Isaiah said long before him: “Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter” (Isaiah 5:20).
This article is not mainly about Hawthorne’s famous work. But since I have raised it, it might be worth pointing out a few matters. Namely, let me highlight three misconceptions about the novel:
“-There is no historical evidence that in Puritan New England adulterers were forced to wear a scarlet letter A on their breasts.
-The picture that Hawthorne paints of the Puritans is a satiric exaggeration, not an accurate account of the Puritans as they were in principle. Furthermore, although Hawthorne condemns Puritan behavior in his story, he affirms Puritan/Christian doctrine in the conclusion of his story.
-Although the sin of adultery lies behind the action of the story, this is not a story about adultery or sex; it is about sin, guilt, hypocrisy (in the form of hidden sin), confession of sin, and forgiveness.”
(Leland Ryken, Philip Ryken, and Todd Wilson, Pastors in the Classics. Baker Books, 2012, pp. 23-24)
8 Replies to “When Evil Is Championed”
Just because a government makes a specific sin legal does not mean that God overlooks it. God’s law is still supreme.
So many “so called believers” are looking to their culture rather than Christ for their standards, therefore they are blinded and deceived to the truth when it is presented to them.
Where are people speaking out, standing up, shouting out against the sinful living in this world.
Are leaders, pastors, ‘moral crusaders making a Godly stand on the Word of God? Are they?
Professor John Finnis is delivering a talk (in a nutshell) about the preference of philosophically and legally justifiable straight lifestyles at Notre Dame University in Fremantle, Perth. Guess what? Watoday, The West Australian online site, keeps reporting on this (repeatedly the very same article) seemingly in an attempt to get gay sympathisers to attend, and protest the conservative stance Finnis is advocating. When the MSM is siding with, advocating, and ‘raising the talk to target status’ what hope is there? I’m encouraged when I find blog sites of modern philosophers (even a gay law student) who systematically, logically and morally argue against same sex marriage.
Unfortunately I find many of the arguments defending traditional marriage to be shallow, poorly presented, and when refuted, unable to counter argue. More often than not defenders of the traditional family are simply shouted down, even when a logical argument is presented.
Bill, you are an exception here; your arguments are clear, succinct, logical and you are clearly able to counter argue. Sometimes (well maybe more often than not) you wield a big stick, but sometimes that is what is needed.
At the end of the day, what benefit does same sex marriage bring to the community at large, and society in general?
Bill Muehlenberg, CultureWatch
Judith, your first sentence is something I’ve been trying to get through people’s heads for a long time now. But they are too far gone. They don’t believe in God, therefore His Law is irrelevant (in their minds) and they make plenty of noise forcing this view upon the rest of us.
A lot of youngsters have swallowed the gay marriage thing, along with many other modern trends, believing that “love will overcome all”, including us miserable crusty old toads who refuse to move with the times and are just looking to make everyone else’s life dull.
In Britain, on Tuesday, the House of Lords permitted the SSM Bill to progress to its second reading; there were numerous opponents, but not enough; especially after government re-scheduled the voting-date for tactical advantages. If this passes into law, the militants will be swiftly moving on to their next targets; and people are just too stupid to see the consequences.
I think that if anyone wants to change the law on anything, that it is obvious that they have to demonstrate how the new law will be better. That would be interesting with homosexual “marriage”. What good is it to society?
Spot on, Chris.
In a recent letter to our local paper I criticised the slogan which says that the only criterion for legal marriage should be that two people claim to love one another. I pointed out that even if we have same-sex “marriage” the law will still prevent marriage (I hope) on grounds of relationship, age and whether the peson is already married.
Someone answered my letter with the accusation that I was vilifying gay people by making same-sex marriage synonymous with paedophilia, incest and bigamy. Actually I wouldn’t be surprised if some of those things were one day legalised, but the comment in the letter is a good example of the inability or refusal of many people to use their brains when arguing. Reading online comments on marriage also makes one despair of sensible discussion.
I was amused a couple of years ago when someone wrote that I was a spokesman for Fred Nile and the Christian Democrats, when I had left the party in the 1990s and was never more than one who paid his fees and helped hand out papers at election time, as I still do.
When I look at the nonsense that I come across occasionally it makes me realise how much Bill must have to put up with his prolific comment and activity.
Ian, you are somewhat idealistic, as am I and as I wish more would be. 🙂 But these days the law is merely a reflection of what we humans already do, in other words it is nothing more than a mucky dirty cesspool. Long gone are the days when the law was actually an ideal to aspire to, as indeed it should be.