More Adult Perversion, More Child Victimisation

As the West well and truly rejects its Judeo-Christian heritage, it is happy to smash one taboo after another along the way. With every kind of sexual perversion now being celebrated and heralded as our “right”, things can only get worse. Indeed, the sexual revolution has unleashed a tsunami of evil, and it is quickly reaching its apex.

The last frontier is the war on our children, and paedophilia is everywhere today coming out of the closet. Now that we have managed to convince ourselves that homosexuality is a human rights issue, the activists are calling for child sex to be legalised. After all, we don’t want to deny the adult perverts their rights to get their sexual thrills.

Every day we seem to have news items about the slow but steady promotion of this war against children. In just the last few days four news items have caught my attention, and taken together they make for depressing reading. Let me begin with the warnings of Dr. Keith Ablow.

He writes, “There were those who scoffed at my contention that Abercrombie and Fitch, the edgy retailer, was paving the way for mainstream pedophilia when it began marketing breast enhancing bikinis to girls as young as eight. There were those who railed against my contention that the French edition of Vogue was kindling pedophilia and embracing it with its racy depictions of 10-year-olds in heavy makeup, a plunging neckline and stiletto heels.”

He continues, “But, now, there should be no doubt that our culture is poised to begin embracing pedophilia as a lifestyle choice, just like homosexuality. A group of psychiatrists and other mental health professionals called B4U-Act, which has representatives from Harvard and Johns Hopkins, gathered recently in Baltimore to organize their push to change the negative perception of pedophiles and encourage them to get help in a nonjudgmental environment.

“While B4U-Act is not representative of mainstream psychiatry, and while the American Psychiatric Association (APA) did not participate in the group’s meeting, psychiatry has a history of caving into cultural pressure to stop defining controversial illnesses as pathological.”

He concludes, “I’ve told more than one of my patients that his real diagnosis, given his behavior in embracing drugs, instead of his family or employment, shouldn’t be alcohol dependence or heroin dependence, but ‘scumbag.’ And I then have quickly added that they can do better than that—that they must choose to do better than that, because, deep inside, they are good and decent and lovable. I tell them they can find the courage to do the right thing, instead of the wrong thing. Yes, I sometimes use the word ‘wrong.’ I judge them. It helps.

“I would not hesitate to tell a pedophile that his desires are to injure and torture a child—that they are morally wrong—and that it is his responsibility to ferret out the source of those destructive desires and extinguish them. I wouldn’t for a moment commiserate about how hard it is to live in a society that criminalizes the acts he is moved to commit.

“Suggesting to pedophiles that their thoughts and impulses are ‘understandable’ and that they won’t be judged by the members of B4U-Act is the kind of message that encourages them to push harder to change what they think of as unfair laws that keep them from their base desires. I hate to say I told you so, but . . . well . . . OK, I won’t.”

Examples of the sexualisation of our children, and the push to normalise adult perversions can be found all over the Western world. Consider what is happening in Switzerland at the moment. One report says this: “Kindergarten children in Basel, Switzerland will be presented this year with fabric models of human genitalia in a ‘sex box’ to teach them that ‘contacting body parts can be pleasurable.’ The kit for teachers to give sex-education lessons to primary school children uses models and recommends having children massage each other or to rub themselves with warm sand bags, accompanied by soft music.”

Great, just what little five year-olds need. Fortunately not everyone was thrilled with the idea: “Daniel Trappitsch of the Citizens for Citizens association called the idea a ‘catastrophic development.’ ‘Sex education, sure, but it shouldn’t been done this early and it certainly shouldn’t be obligatory,’ he said. His group said they would fight the proposal.”

And consider similar sexual insanity in the US. The Obama government – arguably the most anti-family and anti-faith government ever in the US – is pushing these anti-child measures as well. “The Obama administration is renewing efforts to promote sex to children — following on the heels of decisions by the pro-abortion president to de-fund abstinence education programs that have helped teenagers.”

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services claims that “Children are human beings and therefore sexual beings. It’s hard for parents to acknowledge this, just as it’s hard for kids to think of their parents as sexually active. But even infants have curiosity about their own bodies, which is healthy and normal.”

This is what it says about masturbation for example: “Parents should only be concerned about masturbation if a child seems preoccupied with it to the exclusion of other activities. Victims of sexual abuse sometimes become preoccupied with self-stimulation.”

Again, not everyone has fallen for this rubbish. Peter Sprigg of the Family Research Council, said this: “The idea that ‘children are human beings and therefore sexual beings’ is one of the most destructive myths of the sexual revolution. To a large extent, this myth may be traced to the ‘research’ conducted by Alfred Kinsey, including the infamous ‘Children of Table 34’ experiments, which involved the deliberate sexual abuse of children as young as 6 months old under ‘experimental’ conditions.”

I have discussed in detail – and the details are sickening indeed – the perverted activities of Kinsey and the child abuse he took part in elsewhere. I urge every single one of you to see for example this article:

Sprigg continues: “The fact that young children are aware that their bodies include genitalia hardly makes them ‘sexual beings,’ and it is improper (and potentially dangerous) to treat them as such before puberty. Sex is sex, whether ‘experimental’ or not, whereas abstinence is abstinence –and the latter should be the expected standard of behavior for unmarried teens.”

Finally, if you ever wondered why so much decadent, sleazy and perverted stuff flows out of Hollywood, it seems there is a very good reason for this.  Consider this headline: “Actor Claims Pedophilia Is Hollywood’s Big Secret”. Here is how the article begins:

“Actor Corey Feldman recently went out on a limb to talk about something nobody wants to talk about in Hollywood: sexual abuse of children and child actors – otherwise known as pedophilia. In ABC’s specific interview with Feldman, the actor makes some disturbing claims. Being famous and underage, he said, caused serious damage to him and his friends, including loss of innocence and a lost childhood. ‘I can tell you that the No. 1 problem in Hollywood was and is and always will be pedophilia. That’s the biggest problem for children in this industry. … It’s the big secret,’ Feldman said.

“‘I was surrounded by [pedophiles] when I was 14 years old. … Didn’t even know it. It wasn’t until I was old enough to realize what they were and what they wanted … They were everywhere, Feldman, 40, said. The trauma of pedophilia contributed to the 2010 death of his closest friend and ‘The Lost Boys’ co-star, Corey Haim, Feldman said. ‘There’s one person to blame in the death of Corey Haim. And that person happens to be a Hollywood mogul. And that person needs to be exposed, but, unfortunately, I can’t be the one to do it,’ Feldman said, adding that he, too, had been sexually abused by men in show business.”

Ladies and gentlemen, we are in a war. This is a war being fought with the highest of stakes, and the prize will be our very children. Either we abandon them to despicable sexual perverts, or we stand up for them and fight this evil every step of the way.

Which side will you be on? It’s your call. I know which side I am on.

[1379 words]

15 Replies to “More Adult Perversion, More Child Victimisation”

  1. This is slightly off-topic but it’s essays like this that make me wonder why so many people oppose people such as yourself, Bill. You cite article after article, expert after expert, give individual examples that verify what you’re saying, all to stop the civilised world driving itself off a cliff, and some people want to oppose your watchman calls and engage in infantile attacks instead.

    It really says more about them than it does about you. Which right-thinking person – parent especially – would not be grateful that you attempt to uphold a world where children are safe from sexual predators? What do you think Jesus would’ve condoned? How did Jesus treat children?

    People were bringing little children to Jesus for him to place his hands on them, but the disciples rebuked them. When Jesus saw this, he was indignant. He said to them, “Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of God belongs to such as these. Truly I tell you, anyone who will not receive the kingdom of God like a little child will never enter it.” And he took the children in his arms, placed his hands on them and blessed them. Mark 10:13-16

    A right-thinking nation should by default display an aversion to sexual perversion. Part of this is done by the express upholding and celebration of the ideal as above all others. The human body is made male and female, two halves for a certain purpose, and the denial of this function in adulthood and the importance of this private act for the public good is probably at the heart of most of the problems we have today as a society. Can anybody seriously state that children – our next generation – do not do better as a group when they are raised by both their biological parents under the legal and social institution of marriage?

    Sexual license begets further sexual license. Slowly but surely, bit by bit. “That which we tolerate today, we will embrace tomorrow.” Unchecked it would not stop until people can legitimately ‘marry’ a pack of dead dogs and bash detractors with cries of ‘intolerance’. I know many dismiss the ‘slippery slope’ argument, but how can they deny what clearly is happening all around the globe? Again, it probably says more about their personal morality than anything else. Anyone with no personal stake in (including having repented from) the sexual morality breakdown so prevalent these days would have no issue with what you are writing. The evidence is simply too overwhelming.

    This is also why the personal lives of our politicians matter. If they do not hold to a high standard of principles in their personal lives on moral issues, especially in relation to those they claim to love, what chance do nameless voters have to mean much to someone with this kind of mindset? Policies are inconsequential if our so-called representatives for good governance are failures in fundamental ways of principle and common sense. The trojan horse of the ‘homosexuality is identity’ and ‘marriage equality’ agendas lead to things like this, where express and almost insane denials of human sexual function and morality becomes more and more acceptable. But as disease, sexual abuse and social disorder increase we will all pay the heavy price for the sad folly of this overall direction.

    We must turn back from this madness. I pray that those awake to these issues will continue to fight, and those unaware will be woken up. May it happen.

    Mark Rabich

  2. Thanks for that Mark

    As an example of the very thing you are speaking about, consider the latest comments under this article:

    When we simply seek to speak truth and show the love of Christ to people, we get accused of all sorts of things.

    Also, I was originally considering ending this article with words from Christ about children – as you did: “If anyone causes one of these little ones—those who believe in me—to stumble, it would be better for them to have a large millstone hung around their neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea” (Matthew 18:6).

    Bill Muehlenberg, CultureWatch

  3. Hi Bill
    Your article and the comments by Mark reminded me of the visit to Australia by Dr. Judith Reisman in, I think, 1990. John Jost interviewed her on the 7:30 Report with probably the most vitriolic, biased agenda I have ever witnessed on TV. Through it all, Dr. Reisman attempted to calmly answer the issues he raised, even though it was blatantly obvious he was not interested in anything she had to say. Even the ABC couldn’t overlook his totally unprofessional outburst, and, as I recall, he was removed from his position soon after.
    Thank you Bill for speaking out on so many issues that the mainstream media are intent on totally ignoring.
    Vic Trudeau

  4. Thanks Vic

    Yes I remember it well. It may have been 1992, but she actually got kicked off the program. She was describing the sexualisation of our children, and Jost just abused her and yelled at her. He called her a wowser and told her to get off his show!

    Of course few were aware of the fact that this guy was a real sleazeball. He had been editor of Australian Playboy, and was up to his ears in smut. So 20 years ago those who warned about this were howled down with derision, and the same is true today. There is a real war going on here, and our children are at risk big time.

    Bill Muehlenberg, CultureWatch

  5. Bill, that statement “Children are human beings and therefore sexual beings.” is readily refuted by referring to a lot of adult things eg. work, driving a car, playing international sport.

    Sadly, the main risk is that proponents of the children can do anything at any age theory will get more ideas for “adult-ising” children.

    John Angelico

  6. Hi Bill,

    I have seen the Kinsey film and I can say, in light of what I’ve learned of his research from you, that it was revisionist in portraying him as being against paedophilia. I suppose that would have been a bit too much for today’s society and might have exposed the glorification of promiscuity and homosexuality that the film portrays as what it really is: perversion.

    One wonders why all of this is getting pushed so hard but I think I have an inkling. Perhaps all these interest groups promoting various perversions of sexuality know deep down that it’s wrong, and want external validation. That explains at least partly why we are having gay “marriage” rammed down our throats while gays are free to have civil unions and they already have adoption and “assisted reproduction”. There is absolutely no “discrimination” left but the sanctity of marriage still exists to remind homosexuals that they are not the same as a married couple. So it will have to go. Of course we are well down the slippery slope now which is opening the door to yet more extreme perversions like polyamory and paedophilia. They will not rest until those things are accepted as mainstream, so again the price we pay for not having these destructive perversions in society is eternal vigilance and eternal readiness to repel them with moral certainty and backup from science.

    Reinhard Dekter

  7. I looked up the definition of “wowser” and found that in Australia it is a derogatory word denoting a humourless person who saps all the fun from a situation, derived from the Temperance movement at the turn of C20th. Similarly in England in 1960’s, Mary Whitehouse was vilified for trying to censor the increasing acceptance of foul language and behaviour for entertainment promoted by what is now known as the “metropolitan elite” as opposed to ordinary people. Nobody likes a Spoil Sport.

    The media, Television, film, internet, video games have created a virtual reality which robs children of their innocence if they are not shielded from it. People who want to do away with the old and bring in the new say that sex education is now necessary for kindergarten children because of the dangers from adults or even other off-the-rails small children (8-year olds raping other children). This purports to be a positive initiative but is cancelled out by the people pushing for this legislation whose inappropriate eagerness sets alarm bells ringing. Also it is commonly held that “half the clergy are bent” condoning homosexuality and tacitly, paedophilia and the current Pope was embroiled in a controversy that he enforced a cover-up of misdemeanours by Catholic priests who abused children who trusted them. This is regrettably how the clergy is perceived by many people.

    We are seeing corruption and decay at all levels of Western society which now seems in an advanced stage of decomposition. The combination of the weak and compromised response of the Church and the flippant cynicism of the unbelievers ushers in a downward spiral of anarchy. Why are people pushing for licence to harm and abuse children, which is a self-explanatory definition of violation? Thankfully there are a few lone voices who can be heard above the howls of the mob and the deafening silence of the church, made possible by Bill and this website and other dissenting voices out there. Let us hope that more people see the dead end ahead and choose a different path, like “the highway of diamonds with nobody on it” of Bob Dylan’s “Hard Rain” song.

    Rachel Smith, UK

  8. That was the biggest shock I got from reading Judith Riesman’s book from last year Sexual Sabotage. The normalizing of paedophilia; I was thinking these people are insane when suggestions of these evil people that the age of consent be lowered to SEVEN! If I ever have children of my own I don’t know where to begin. But then, how many people out there wait until they are married before having interment relationships and not even live together before you are married? Even amongst fellow Christians. Not many I am sure. This sexualisation of children makes me cry. As I mention, I am not even a parent. How can this be reversed?
    Carl Strehlow

  9. Rachel,
    Just for some further information, “wowser” was originally an acronymn, as follows:
    In other words, the term had a wholesome origin, being concerned about real social evils: pub drinking, gambling and its effect on family life, various drugs and drug culture.

    The term has come into regular language meaning anyone who stands for strict morality and religious scruples. Somehow the word “Puritan” has been mixed up with it (erroneously). In times gone by the term was often applied to Christina fundamentalists who refused to drink alcoholic beverages, refused to smoke or gamble, and often disdained going to the theatre.

    In my view, the term could now well apply to the greens with all their strictures on environmental trivia, and even vegetarianism. They are the secular wowsers of our world.

    Murray R. Adamthwaite

  10. So by the time we start having child brides in the West, we might as well follow that you-know-what religion. Can’t get my head around what degradation would come next, but maybe God can’t either.
    “They built high places for Baal in the Valley of Ben Hinnom to sacrifice their sons and daughters to Molek, though I never commanded—nor did it enter my mind—that they should do such a detestable thing…”. Jer 32:35
    The social engineer’s timetable of degradation of the west might go something like this: (In only one dimension)
    Disbelieve the Bible > no accountability > covetousness > materialism > hedonism > free sex > abortion > homosexuality > anarchy > …. and…what next?
    The fall of Rome?
    If Muslim converts are anything to go by, maybe somewhere along the line God might prefer Islam.
    And for that matter, it’s an amazing miracle that any of us got saved! For God, all things are possible.
    Tim Lovett

  11. Many thanks Murray for revealing the acronymn – I feel quite privileged to hear this direct from an Australian – having often wondered what it meant!
    Rachel Smith, UK

  12. Their is a verse in song of songs about not awakening love before it desires. I’m not a Bible scholar but from my own experience sexual desire is awakened. I was 25 before this happened, as I waited for the one I would marry.

    Today with 13 and 14 year olds kissing, stroking and more how can we expect them to wait until they marry at 30+. Yes I’m sure it is possible with God’s help but I believe he wants us to wait to awaken this desire so we don’t have to fight it for very long before our wedding day.

    Awakening a 5 year old in the name of sex-ed it utter foolishness. I do believe in sex-ed for the young but I think it should be clinical not sensual. I think we can simply explain where babies come from. I think we can explain personal space and that they have the right to their personal space. I think we can teach them to trust their feeling and say ‘no’ to an adult if they feel something is wrong.

    We have told our children that they are to respect and obey those in authority over them BUT if that person wants them to do something God does not want them to do they should say ‘no’ and tell someone they trust.

    I also think children should be taught the difference between good secrets (like a surprise party) and bad secrets (were they are told Mummy won’t love them if they tell). But all of this can be done without being explicit and without physical experimentation.

    As parent we need to know what is being taught to our children and to keep them safe from ungodly sex-ed.

    Kylie Anderson

  13. Maranatha – Come Lord Jesus for surely things cannot get any worse?
    Anna Cook

  14. Bill,
    When homosexuals want marriage and our children, then the collapse of society is not far away

    Neil Herbert

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *