CultureWatch

Bill Muehlenberg's commentary on issues of the day...

The Iron Lady

Jan 2, 2012

OK, I have not seen the film yet, and I am not sure if I will. I keep getting mixed signals on the new film about Margaret Thatcher starring Meryl Streep. Of course one can assess a film in terms of artistic merits and the like. But that is not so much my concern here.

Because Thatcher is such a polarising figure, at the end of the day it is the political considerations that I am most concerned about. Will this be yet another hatchet job by leftists in Hollywood on a conservative leader? Or will it be an even-handed and balanced affair?

The film has only just opened so more reviews will be forthcoming. Already critics have sent out mixed reviews here, and I await what some politically inclined commentators will say. One early reviewer did offer this bit of reassurance for conservatives such as myself: “‘The Iron Lady:’ Wonderfully, Conservatively Subversive”.

She begins her review this way: “Conservatives have nothing to fear from the controversial and wonderfully subversive Margaret Thatcher biopic, ‘The Iron Lady.’ Because the creators, whatever their personal political beliefs, had the artistic integrity to let Thatcher be Thatcher, the film becomes a rousing call to those who believe that ‘those who can do, must get up and DO’.”

I hope that is the case, and I may yet go see the film (although my wife informs me she is not too interested in going!). But having a long-standing conservative friend staying with me at the moment, I may go with him instead (his wife can join my wife for a different film!). We are both great admirers of Thatcher and both would be interested to see how the film deals with this remarkable woman.

For those not all that familiar with her work, let me just remind you of a few basics. She led the Tories from 1975 and was the British Prime Minister from 1979 to 1990. She along with Ronald Reagan helped to defeat the Evil Empire abroad, and she did the tough but necessary work of turning around a stagnant and dying United Kingdom.

Rich Lowry offers us a helpful overview of her work and legacy: “The country she wanted to save was, by the late 1970s, an embarrassing wreck. After World War II, Britain’s leaders had run the ship of state aground on the shoals of socialism. The country was broke and beset by maliciously powerful unions. Humiliatingly, it had to go to the International Monetary Fund for a loan. In 1975, Henry Kissinger told President Ford, ‘Britain is a tragedy — it has sunk to begging, borrowing, stealing.’

“Claire Berlinski, author of the book-length study of Thatcher titled There Is No Alternative, quotes Michael Howard, a subsequent leader of the Tory party: ‘The air of defeatism which was the prevailing climate of the time was the economic and social equivalent of Munich.’

“It took considerable moral courage for Thatcher to insist that practically everyone else was wrong — including the accommodationists in her own party — and that Britain could take an entirely different path. In 1979 she ran on a party manifesto that excoriated declinism. ‘She had been elected to reverse Britain’s decline,’ writes John O’Sullivan, the former Thatcher aide and author of The President, the Pope, and the Prime Minister, ‘not to explain it smoothly away like virtually every other political leader.’

“It wasn’t enough to rage against Britain’s fate without correctly diagnosing the source of its sickness. As Berlinski notes, Thatcher made an unsparing and comprehensive case against socialism. ‘In the end,’ she thundered, ‘the real case against socialism is not its economic inefficiency, though on all sides there is evidence of that. Much more fundamental is its basic immorality.’

“Bold but never reckless, Thatcher as prime minister undertook a comprehensive free-market program to tame inflation, restrain spending, cut taxes, privatize industries, bring unions to heel, and deregulate the financial industry. At one point, her approval rating dipped to 23 percent, but her vindication was a sustained return to dynamism and growth. Her victory in the Falklands War represented a turning point in national pride. She was Ronald Reagan’s partner in defeating the Soviets. By the end of her career, she had accomplished what Britain’s consensus had once deemed impossible.”

As important as she was as a political leader, a word about Thatcher and religion is needed. Evidently the movie makes no mention whatsoever of her Christianity. Thus this is one major omission in the film. Much can be said here, but perhaps the best move is to simply offer a few brief quotes from an important speech she gave to the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland in 1988:

“I think back to many discussions in my early life when we all agreed that if you try to take the fruits of Christianity without its roots, the fruits will wither. And they will not come again unless you nurture the roots. But we must not profess the Christian faith and go to Church simply because we want social reforms and benefits or a better standard of behaviour; but because we accept the sanctity of life, the responsibility that comes with freedom and the supreme sacrifice of Christ expressed so well in the hymn: ‘When I survey the wondrous Cross, On which the Prince of glory died, My richest gain I count but loss, And pour contempt on all my pride’….

“The truths of the Judaic-Christian tradition are infinitely precious, not only, as I believe, because they are true, but also because they provide the moral impulse which alone can lead to that peace, in the true meaning of the word, for which we all long.

“To assert absolute moral values is not to claim perfection for ourselves. No true Christian could do that. What is more, one of the great principles of our Judaic-Christian inheritance is tolerance. People with other faiths and cultures have always been welcomed in our land, assured of equality under the law, of proper respect and of open friendship. There’s absolutely nothing incompatible between this and our desire to maintain the essence of our own identity. There is no place for racial or religious intolerance in our creed.

“When Abraham Lincoln spoke in his famous Gettysburg speech of 1863 of ‘government of the people, by the people, and for the people’, he gave the world a neat definition of democracy which has since been widely and enthusiastically adopted. But what he enunciated as a form of government was not in itself especially Christian, for nowhere in the Bible is the word democracy mentioned. Ideally, when Christians meet, as Christians, to take counsel together their purpose is not (or should not be) to ascertain what is the mind of the majority but what is the mind of the Holy Spirit—something which may be quite different.

“Nevertheless I am an enthusiast for democracy. And I take that position, not because I believe majority opinion is inevitably right or true—indeed no majority can take away God-given human rights—but because I believe it most effectively safeguards the value of the individual, and, more than any other system, restrains the abuse of power by the few. And that is a Christian concept.”

Finally, it should also be pointed out what a great friend of Israel Margaret Thatcher was. As Charles Johnson writes, “When asked about her most meaningful accomplishment, Margaret Thatcher, now embodied by Meryl Streep in the biopic Iron Lady, did not typically mention serving in the British government, defeating the Argentine invasion of the Falklands, taming runaway inflation, or toppling the Soviet Union. The woman who reshaped British politics and served as prime minister from 1979 to 1990 often said that her greatest accomplishment was helping save a young Austrian girl from the Nazis….

“Thatcher’s philo-Semitism went beyond the people she appointed to her government; it had clear political implications as well. She made Jewish causes her own, including by easing the restrictions on prosecuting Nazi war criminals living in Britain and pleading the cause of the Soviet Union’s refuseniks. She boasted that she once made Soviet officials ‘nervous’ by repeatedly bringing up the refuseniks’ plight during a single nine-hour meeting with Mikhail Gorbachev, ‘The Soviets had to know that every time we met their treatment of the refuseniks would be thrown back at them,’ she explained in her book The Downing Street Years.

“Thatcher also worked to end the British government’s support for the Arab boycott of Israel. During the Yom Kippur War of 1973, Thatcher criticized Tory Prime Minister Ted Heath’s refusal to supply Israel with military parts or even allow American planes to supply Israel from British airfields. In 1986, Thatcher became the first British prime minister to visit Israel, having previously visited twice as a member of parliament.”

Hey, I’m getting excited already about this great woman even as I type these words. Maybe I will go see the film after all. I just sure hope it does not disappoint…

www.patheos.com/blogs/tinseltalk/2011/12/the-iron-lady-wonderfully-conservatively-subversive/
www.nationalreview.com/articles/286820/thatcher-vs-decline-rich-lowry
www.margaretthatcher.org/document/107246
www.tabletmag.com/news-and-politics/87027/thatcher-and-the-jews/?all=1

[1500 words]

19 Responses to The Iron Lady

  • Let’s not forget too that Tony Blair had to campaign on a platform of a reformed Labor party omitting any reference to socialism again. Thatcher had so discredited socialism that it was toxic for Labor to be seen anywhere near such a model.
    Damien Spillane

  • Yes quite right Damien.

    Bill Muehlenberg, CultureWatch

  • Yes, but does all the good stuff come out in the film – that is the immediate question.

    The review I read was a definite “thumbs down” on that score.

    See how you go, Bill.

    John Angelico

  • I might see it tomorrow, but if Janet is even half accurate, I might be disappointed:

    www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/sadly-no-sign-of-iron-lady-here/story-e6frg7bo-1226215529927

    Bill Muehlenberg, CultureWatch

  • The film was entertaining, as was intended. That’s all. If you want accurate history, you’ll have to read some decent biographies.

    I liked her reference to the Argentinian junta as thugs. But they were worse, torturing and murdering dissident citizens by the hundred, hiding the corpses in mass graves or dumping them at sea. We should respect her for standing up to them.

    John Snowden

  • Being of the y generation (28 years of age) I never knew much of Margaret Thatcher except the overall negativity about her in the media etc. Now I see that she was disliked because she was a conservative and the vast majority of the media reporting on her are leftists. We need a leader like Margaret here in Australia!

    On a side note, I see Israel mentioned again. A conservative myself, I’ve never quite understood the obsession from conservatives about Israel. I think Israel most often gets a bad rap from the leftist media, but Israel has a lot of problems herself. We are always talking about the loss of Christianity in western countries like our own so I’m surprised we support a very secular nation. Please enlighten me.

    Luke Belik

  • Thanks Luke

    Obviously Christians would have a special interest in Israel, but if for no other reason, conservatives should support Israel since it is the only democracy in the Middle East, surrounded by Muslim majority nations, most of whom hate America and the West as much as they do Israel.

    But I discuss these matters more fully elsewhere, eg: www.billmuehlenberg.com/2010/06/03/christians-and-israel/

    Bill Muehlenberg, CultureWatch

  • Hey that’s great Bill I never knew about the Christian convictions of Thatcher, inspirational stuff.

    Sadly it will never get in the film.

    I always thought she was a great lady now I know why.

    How the current offerings we have down under pales into insignificance.
    What could have been if our present PM didn’t turn her back on her Baptist upbringing but allowed it to develop.

    Rob Withall

  • Not surprising that Hollywood should not know what to do with Mrs Thatcher’s religious convictions, and therefore left them out entirely. The result must be a cinematic biography which, ironically, shows the ‘fruits without the roots’ of Margaret Thatcher’s character.
    Pr Mark Henderson

  • Yes, MT clearly had Christian beliefs – but from time to time one hears things that are disturbing (from this point of view), eg. the idea that she went a long way to enshrine, in British law, the principle that Downs Syndrome foetuses were not to be protected from abortion as being not fully human/worthy of life (has anyone else heard this? I hope it’s wrong); she did, after all, have much belief in the idea of valuing people because of their abilities/gifts, rather than mere human-ness (which I see as the default Christian position).
    John Thomas, UK

  • I haven’t seen the film either, yet, Bill, but I’m pleased to say that my wife *does* want to see it with me!

    Given my Argentine origins I’m a bit ambivalent about the Falklands/Malvinas conflict, but I do agree that any change in the status of those islands can only be done by peaceful agreements that the Islanders approve. The one benefit of that conflict for the Argentine people was the way it showed up the miserable dictatorship for what it was and led directly to its downfall, and good riddance!

    What I most admired about Maggie Thatcher was the way she always persisted with tackling the Soviet persecution of its internal human rights critics. This is what all Western government officials should do *now* every time they meet *any* Chinese government officials. The Chinese régime’s dreary drivel about non-interference needs to be tossed aside every time without fail.

    Dominic Baron, NZ

  • Rob Withall and Pt Mark Henderson are wrong about Margaret Thatcher’s religious convictions being left out of the film. They are not. When she arrived at Downing Street after being elected Britain’s first ever woman Prime Minister she stops on the steps of Number 10 and her first words to the assembled press contingent were the words of the prayer of St Francis of Assisi: “Where there is discord, may we bring harmony. Where there is error, may we bring truth. Where there is doubt, may we bring faith. And where there is despair, may we bring hope.” I liked the film very much. The portrayal of her in her old age having a series of ‘flash backs’ is very good and in no way diminishes who she was and what she accomplished.
    Bob Day

  • So has no one heard about MT’s attitude to the low-intelligence unborn? One thing I discovered (on a TV docu, of all places) was that after the Brighton bombing (in which the IRA almost murdered MT and the entire Cabinet) MT knelt on the bedroom floor (in her hotel) to pray, and requested an aide to do the same also (hence we know about this incident). This, of course, supports the claim that she had a real Christian faith (unlike, I think, certain other overtly/outwardly Christian PMs (am I cynical?)).
    John Thomas, UK

  • Thanks guys.

    Here are the thoughts of someone who used to work for her:

    www.theaustralian.com.au/news/features/not-quite-the-thatcher-i-knew/story-e6frg6z6-1226237736774

    Bill Muehlenberg, CultureWatch

  • Hi Bill,

    Not having read much material on Margaret Thatcher, I was surprised to hear from you about her christian background. That was rather encouraging and I may go and see the movie now myself. However I do have a question you may be able to answer. I once read an article claiming Margaret Thatcher along with some others, were behind the Global Warming Theory. Is there any truth to this?

    Regards
    Trisha Ellis

  • Thanks Trish

    She has shifted her postion on this: “Thatcher shocked the UN in 1989 with a call to action on man-made global warming, but has since made sceptical public statements about anthropogenic climate change.”

    www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/jun/22/thatcher-climate-sceptic-monckton

    Bill Muehlenberg, CultureWatch

  • We saw it yesterday evening. It was interesting to see her fight. The conservative party at first dismissed her as a grocer’s daughter. She added “with a degree from oxford”. And she made them take notice. In the end it was her convictions that at first got her into power and eventually cost her.
    At first I found the way of showing her as an old lady talking with her deceased husband, confusing. But it was well acted and I think was a fair picture of a committed conservative who stuck to her convictions whatever others said or did. Any Christian convictions were glossed over. The prayer of St Francis could have been prayed by anyone.
    Bill take your wife. I nearly gave up my free ticket so you could go with my husband but I’m glad I went.

    Katherine Fishley

  • A somewhat more positive review from a conservative can be found here:

    townhall.com/columnists/guybenson/2012/01/18/the_iron_lady_impresses_as_streep_soars

    Bill Muehlenberg, CultureWatch

Leave a Reply