The War on Mothers and Fathers

The push for special rights for homosexuals, including marriage and adoption rights, of necessity means the destruction of motherhood and fatherhood. Gendered parenthood, as has always been understood, is the latest casualty in this ongoing assault on children, parents, marriage, family and society by the militants.

They are happy to destroy all this just to force-feed their social engineering agenda onto us all, whether we like it or not. They will not rest till the very foundation of society is gutted and transformed into a sexual no-man’s land where families and parents have been replaced by whatever kinky combo can be dreamed up.

To please the militants our completely befuddled leaders are happy to smash the oldest and most important of social institutions. Everything must go in order to allow this tiny minority group to get full social recognition and approval. Never mind that so many – probably even most – homosexuals don’t even want marriage; it seems our cowardly governments are bending over backwards to give them anything they want.

The latest example of moral perversion and family suicide comes from France. As they move ahead with homosexual marriage, they of course must ensure that everything else falls into line. Thus mums and dads must forever be squashed, and left on the ash heap of history.

Here is how one news report covers this madness: “France is set to ban the words ‘mother’ and ‘father’ from all official documents under controversial plans to legalise gay marriage. The move which has outraged Catholics means only the word ‘parents’ would be used in identical marriage ceremonies for all heterosexual and same-sex couples.

“The draft law states that ‘marriage is a union of two people, of different or the same gender’. And it says all references to ‘mothers and fathers’ in the civil code – which enshrines French law – will be swapped for simply ‘parents’. The law would also give equal adoption rights to homosexual and heterosexual couples.

“Justice Minister Christiane Taubira told France’s Catholic newspaper La Croix: ‘Who is to say that a heterosexual couple will bring a child up better than a homosexual couple, that they will guarantee the best conditions for the child’s development? What is certain is that the interest of the child is a major preoccupation for the government.’

“The head of the French Catholic Church Cardinal Philippe Barbarin warned followers last week that gay marriage could lead to legalised incest and polygamy in society. He told the Christian’s RFC radio station: ‘Gay marriage would herald a complete breakdown in society. ‘This could have innumerable consequences. Afterward they will want to create couples with three or four members. And after that, perhaps one day the taboo of incest will fall’.”

This of course is not the first time such madness has occurred. All over the Western world governments are caving in to the radical agendas of the militants as they seek to blitzkrieg all before them. Let me just offer a handful of other examples of this.

In the US we had this moonbattery from BHO: “Obama’s State Dept. Removes Mother, Father From Passports”. A news item says this: “In what seems to be a diplomatic effort at extreme political correctness and a nod to gay rights groups, the Obama administration is removing the words ‘mother’ and ‘father’ from U.S. passport applications and replacing them with ‘gender neutral’ terminology. Mom and dad will now be referred to rather coldly as ‘parent one’ and ‘parent two.’

“Conservative Christian groups are outraged over the decision. ‘Only in the topsy-turvy world of left-wing political correctness could it be considered an “improvement” for a birth-related document to provide less information about the circumstances of that birth,’ Family Research Council president Tony Perkins wrote in a statement to Fox News Radio. ‘This is clearly designed to advance the causes of same-sex “marriage” and homosexual parenting without statutory authority, and violates the spirit if not the letter of the Defense of Marriage Act.’

“‘The words in the old form were “mother” and “father”,’ Brenda Sprague, deputy assistant Secretary of State for Passport Services, confirmed Fox News. ‘They are now “parent one” and “parent two”.’ A statement on the State Department website noted: ‘These improvements are being made to provide a gender neutral description of a child’s parents and in recognition of different types of families.’ The statement didn’t note if it was for child applications only.”

But not to be outdone, consider this utter insanity from Sweden. In at least one preschool there they have actually banned the words ‘him’ and ‘her’. Says one report: “The taxpayer-funded preschool which opened last year in the liberal Sodermalm district of Stockholm for kids aged one to six is among the most radical examples of Sweden’s efforts to engineer equality between the sexes from childhood onward. Breaking down gender roles is a core mission in the national curriculum for preschools, underpinned by the theory that even in highly egalitarian-minded Sweden, society gives boys an unfair edge. To even things out, many preschools have hired ‘gender pedagogues’ to help staff identify language and behaviour that risk reinforcing stereotypes.”

As I wrote at the time: “Can you believe this absolute insanity? Now Swedish preschools have gender cops roaming the halls, ready to drag away little Bjorn or little Hilda into re-education camps for daring to live out the gender they were born with. Today – in some parts of Sweden at least – it seems it is a crime to be a boy or a girl.

“It appears that the only evil in Sweden is to actually allow boys to be boys and girls to be girls. The destruction of marriage is fine. The war against the family is just peachy. The radical feminist agenda is neato, and the push of the social engineering homosexuals is fine and dandy.

“But dare to have a child remain true to his or her – sorry, to its – gender, and then you are asking for trouble – big time. Perhaps soon they will outlaw all gender differences. Maybe they will force men to breastfeed their babies and force women to have vasectomies.”

Sadly Australia is not immune from all this idiocy. Consider just two recent examples. One Melbourne headline said this: “Gay school guide: Teachers’ manual rejects ‘mum’ and ‘dad’.” Victorian schools are being advised to dump the words “mother” and “father” by a new teachers’ manual that promotes the cause of same-sex parents.

A booklet called “Learn to Include” and a “Teacher’s Manual” advises: “Use inclusive spoken and written language (e.g., ‘parent’ or ‘carer’ rather than ‘mother’ and ‘father’; ‘dominant’ or ‘widespread’ rather than ‘normal’) whenever possible.”

At the time I wrote this: “This teachers’ manual also urges schools to put up posters of homosexuals and lesbians, and also not use gender-specific toys. Children as young as five are also urged to act out homosexual scenarios. The teachers’ manual is meant for students from Prep to Level 3, and is already in use in dozens of Victorian schools.”

And from NSW we find this headline: “‘Father’ to go from birth certificates”. The story goes as follows: “A controversial new bill that will remove the word ‘father’ from birth certificates to recognise lesbian couples who have children through IVF will be put before NSW Parliament. Fifty laws across NSW covering the Local Government Act, Industrial Relations Act and the constitution will be amended to include new parental presumption protection for female same-sex couples.

“The bill equates the position of a lesbian partner of a woman who has a child after becoming pregnant by a fertilisation procedure, other than sexual intercourse, with the position of a married woman’s husband. Lesbian parents will see expressions such as ‘birth mother’ replace ‘mother’ and ‘both parents’ to replace ‘the father and the mother’ on birth certificates.”

These are just some of the cases of family vandalism which are occurring of late to placate the social engineers. Never mind that mothers and fathers need to be eradicated in the process. Godless Communist regimes could go only so far in destroying marriage and family, but it looks like our new secular humanist regimes are succeeding where even the Marxists failed.

That’s some ‘victory’.

[1361 words]

18 Replies to “The War on Mothers and Fathers”

  1. As you say, Bill, many homosexuals do not want marriage, they prefer their difference and prefer to be, as they call it, “queer”. I doubt that they would like to be considered “the new norms”. Activists such as Peter Tatchell have made it clear they want to go beyond marriage equality to what they regard as marriage superiority where you can have sex with pretty well anyone, just as long as it is not a woman!

    They do not want to be like us they want us to be like them. If marriage is destroyed this will affirm their lifestyle but in the process threaten the lifestyle of heterosexual marriages which adhere to natural law, which includes procreation. Worst of all it will threaten the welfare of children.

    The most shocking thing is that Western political leaders are marching us all down this road in the name of secular humanism and equality, but it is an equality that jeopardises the fraternity and liberty of everyone else. They are doing this in agreement with themselves but without recourse to the nations they represent. I see trouble ahead!

    Rachel Smith, UK

  2. Looks like the traditional Mother’s Day and Father’s Day will be banned as heterosexist hate crime.
    Also what will happen if your new born child’s first words turn out to be mummy or daddy? Will the Leftie Lezzies in the Social Work department be informed?
    Iain Duncan, UK

  3. So called ‘gay marriage’ is an audacious and deliberate attempt to destroy the most intimate and personal relationships binding family and national life together. Not only does it deny the unique difference between male and female but relationships, such as husband and wife, father and mother, son and daughter, instead of diversity, it will reduce the human race to zombie partners A,B,C,D…., progenitors 1,2,3, egg and semen donors 000x783T//W. Children will be reduced to mere commodities, trophies and human shields, not knowing who they are or from whence they have come.

    There will be nothing to stop the remaining letters of the LGBTs, the bisexuals and Transsexuals from demanding their rights. Bisexuals in order to give full expression to their marriages will have to be made up of three partners. And the children of transsexuals will be forced to have either a mother who was originally a man or a father who was originally a woman. Incestuous marriages will be no problem, with regard to the danger of producing genetically deformed children, just so long as all the partners are of the same sex- unless that is they resort to IVF and surrogacy using unnamed men and women, where there is the possibility of a close relative of the opposite sex donating either sperm or an egg.
    Indeed, consummation and fidelity will not be required. It will be possible to make taylor-made ‘marriages’ where there is no sex involved. Or it will be possible to have ‘marriages’ where there is neither personal relationship or children involved – only sexual passion; and finally it will be possible to have marriages where there is no personal companionship or sexual passion – just cold procreation and insemination. Indeed, it will be possible for someone to have all three marriages on the go at the same time. The Jerry Spring Show will soon be normality.

    There are those using the same arguments as the gays to have their relationships ratified and embraced by the public. Those in polygamous, polyarmorous, incestuous, paedophile, bestial and necrophile relationships- even those involved in sexual relationships with themselves and objects like buildings – are claiming that they too are in committed, consensual, healthy, rich and nourishing relationships. It is claimed that all these diverse relationships will make society more stable, cohesive and healthy. Every nation in history that attempted to normalise a fraction of the above behaviour disappeared from the map. It is not just the abortion of babies, or the abortion of marriage but the abortion of the nations.

    David Skinner, UK

  4. What on earth is wrong with you people? How is allowing gay people to marry going to affect you? How is this going to allow polygamous or incestious relationships to go ahead? They are illegal you idiots.
    You self sanctimonious buttheads need to stop! Gay people getting maaried is not going to make the world implode. Mum and Dad will still be Mum and Dad.
    I’m straight. I’m happy that should partner and I decide to get married then the law will allow us to. If I was a lesbian then I would expect the same bloody right!
    Stef Mitchell

  5. Thanks Stef

    Actually there is nothing wrong with us, thanks. But one could ask if something is wrong with a person who hurls insults and engages in nonstop name-calling, instead of offering an argument. But of course you don’t have an argument, only visceral reactions. I and others have documented time and time again how gutting the institution of marriage destroys it altogether. And we have shown how granting special rights to homosexuals changes everything. We have hundreds of cases now of people losing their jobs, being jailed, or being fined, all because they happen to disagree with the militant homosexual agenda. I offer a small sampling of that evidence here:

    But we realise evidence tends to mean little to those who would rather push agendas and throw mud.

    Oh, and try telling the hapless kid in a homosexual household that mum and dad will still be mum and dad. Yeah right.

    Bill Muehlenberg, CultureWatch

  6. I want to live on another planet. This one is in a terrible mess. It seems almost everyone is obsessed with either money or sex and sexuality to the exclusion of all else. Those who believe we evolved from monkeys might take, as evidence, the latter obsessive preoccupation.


    Anna Cook

  7. And to think that while all this nonsense is going on for gay’s to ‘marry’ and to raise children who don’t know either their mother or father, or women to have the ‘right’ to kill their unborn child, we’re getting Parliaments to issue apologies to stolen generations who were removed from their parents, or to single mothers who had their babies taken from them.

    Do none of the law-makers see the logical disconnect in what they’re doing?

    Roger Birch

  8. Stef, calm down, calm down. Adultery at one time was illegal; abortion was illegal and so was homosexuality, murder was illegal. Nothing remains the same, Stef. Nothing is in cast iron. Laws can be made and unmade. Things that we thought were unimaginable ten or fifteen years ago have not only come to pass but are well and truly past as we head off into new ground breaking territory. You might think that it is inconceivable that Islam and Sharia will one day take over your country. Well keep on believing it Stef, whilst you may.

    David Skinner, UK

  9. Thanks David

    Yes quite right. There is a massive push going on right now for group marriage and to a lesser extent, bestiality, incest and even paedophilia. Some of this is even coming from the homosexuals themselves. I have documented this all extensively on this site, in my book, and elsewhere.

    Yet some people choose to blissfully live with their head in the sand, and just pretend this is not happening. Either that, or they do know it is happening, but it does not fit in with the ideology they are trying to push to admit to it.

    Bill Muehlenberg, CultureWatch

  10. Damien Spillane, that is the most incredible link. I have managed to get Anglican Mainstream to put it up.

    The lady who posts articles on this web said to me, “David, this is grim. I have posted something on AM.

    May also say, Bill, just how valuable the site is and I wish I had more time to contribute but the war is raging here in the UK. But we desperately need places like your blog where we can exchange the highest quality intelligence just like this.

    David Skinner, UK

  11. Just been looking at some of the material from the Toronto District School Board. The ‘Anti-Oppression’ philosophy and training was alarming.
    It would put parents into the position of being challenged for teaching their children their beliefs and values if these were deemed ‘oppressive’ by the school board. So the schools would be in the business of tearing up families and confusing children. Even distancing them from their parents and isolating them from having any bigger picture than the mantra ,’be who you really are’.
    This is a totally destructive policy that has the potential to screw up many a child’s identity and security.
    It does not take much imagination to see how the rights of the autonomous child can further be extended into the area of sexual exploitation in the name of ‘free choice’.
    Iain Duncan

  12. This is just a thin, thin layer from the strata of the history of the Social Services in Britain. Every British parent and child should have cause for concern.

    Lisa Chrsitensen, was connected by marriage to the Angry Brigade one of whose members was Angela Mason, 1st Chief exec of Stonewall. Overseer of both Sexual Orientation Regs. Civil Partnerships, founder member and present commissioner of the Equality and Human Rights Commission and present Chair of the Fawcett Society.

    A nursery manager accused of shaking babies and forcing them to eat vomit claims she is the victim of a hate campaign by colleagues who disliked the fact she is a lesbian.

    Baby P

    “Many parents have become concerned that children may be molested, encouraged to become sexually active, or even “recruited” into adopting a homosexual identity and lifestyle. Gay activists dismiss such concerns–in part, by strenuously insisting that there is no connection between homosexuality and the sexual abuse of children.

    Huge increase in numbers of children taken into care

    Failure of welsh social services

    Failure Wakefield Social Services

    Failure of Devon magistrates

    Failure of Glamorgan social services

    Failure of Prison service

    Failure of Islington social services
    Lord Chris Smith, gay man and sufferer of HIV, was a Labour councillor for Islington Borough for five years, and was chairman of housing from 1981 to 1983. In 1983 he became MP for Islington South and Finsbury. He was the MP Finsbury and Islington, when the following was happening on his watch: Paedophilia was rife in Islington at this time.


    John Goldup, the Government’s childcare watchdog has been heavily criticised after appointing to a senior post an official embroiled in a notorious paedophile scandal.
    Ofsted has named John Goldup as its social care director – a job which gives him effective control of the protection of youngsters in care homes and nurseries across the UK.
    At the time of his appointment, Mr Goldup said: ‘I am absolutely convinced that effective inspection and regulation are the key to driving up improvement.’
    But during the Eighties and early Nineties, Mr Goldup was the second most senior figure in the children’s department at Islington Council in North London.

    Schools will be penalised if they fail to improve the progress of ‘vulnerable’ groups of pupils such as those who are gay, lesbian, bisexual and transsexual.

    A paedophile who was sentenced to 21 years in prison last week has links with a Labour politician who is a senior figure in the judicial system, The Mail on Sunday can reveal.–helped-hide-past.html

    Orphanages and children’s homes

    Haute de la Garenne
    Recently there has been uncovered a terrible story of paedophilia taking place in a children’s home on the island of Jersey that had direct connections with Islington.

    The present investigation has had very little help from the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of for Justice, Jack Straw. Up till now Jack Straw has refused to step in.

    Harriet Harman has previously said that the absolute rights of individuals like Angela Eagle should not be trumped by cultural values.

    A former diplomat, a television presenter and a doctor were among six people found guilty of abusing 32 children at a Portuguese state-run children’s home

    Foster homes
    Les Cummings An alleged survivor of a horrific catalogue of childhood abuse has been taken on an emotional journey back to the scenes of his ordeal by BBC South’s Inside Out.

    The Children’s Index is to be launched in England and Wales in 2008. It is already being ‘trialled’ by 12 local authorities at a cost of £241million.
    Ministers say that to protect children from harm, and identify potential criminal offenders, the must gather and scrutinise everything known about Britain’s 12million children and their families.

    Greenfield House children’s hostel in Maidenhead, Berkshire.

    Judith Reisman who is a world authority on the evil influence of Alfred Kinsey on western European civilisation.

    Holland Germany and EU to legalise Paedophilia

    Paedophile charter,_Vrijheid_en_Diversiteit

    David Skinner, UK

  13. It is pretty clear biologically speaking that men and women differ from each other. This makes a mockery of clear scientific evidence of the biological difference we have between the two genders.

    Prof Israel Abramov, who led this study commented, “As with other senses, such as hearing and the olfactory system, there are marked sex differences in vision between men and women. The elements of vision we measured are determined by inputs from specific sets of thalamic neurons into the primary visual cortex. We suggest that, since these neurons are guided by the cortex during embryogenesis, that testosterone plays a major role, somehow leading to different connectivity between males and females. The evolutionary driving force between these differences is less clear.”

    Ian Nairn

  14. A moment ago I heard the good news that the Tasmanian upper house defeated the same sex marriage Bill, by the narrowest of margins 8 to 6.

    May the Lord keep giving us these victories to slow down the war on mothers and fathers in our land.

    Cheers, Chris McNicol

  15. One of the dreadful things yet to be fixed is the practice of having separate men’s and women’s events in sport. When the Rugby World Cup has a mostly women’s team competing against a team of mainly men in the final we will know we have arrived (although I don’t know where).

    As for those women athletes and swimmers claiming world records – shame on them. They and the men should all be competing together.
    I probably should keep quiet. If some activists read this they may well campaign for “sport equality”, “equal activity” and accuse people of “equalrightsinsportophobia”.

    David Morrison

  16. The French mortally wounded themselves in the Jacobin uprising and have never recovered.

    Warren Taylor

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *