More on the Pfizer Papers
Further remarks on this crucial volume:
The new book edited by Naomi Wolf with Amy Kelly is now selling like hotcakes – and for good reason. The Pfizer Papers: Pfizer’s Crimes Against Humanity (War Room Books, 2024) tells us what most of the mainstream media is refusing to cover.
In my introductory article on this vitally important book I provided an overview of the volume’s contents, and shared a bit about the heavy personal price Wolf had to pay for daring to sound the alarm on all this. See that piece here: https://billmuehlenberg.com/2024/10/29/pfizer-exposed/
This is a very large book filled with reams of information, facts and figures. I am still going through it, but I can at least at this point alert others as to what they can expect from it. The Introduction to this volume presents us with a nice summary of what is discussed, and I quoted some of it in my previous piece. Let me share more from it here:
In the two years since Ms. Kelly and the volunteers have been working together, they have gone through 2,369 documents and data files totaling hundreds of thousands of pages and have issued almost one hundred reports. I taught the volunteers to write these in a language that everyone could understand—which I thought was very important to maximize their impact. And Amy Kelly meticulously revised almost all, and edited all, of them.
The first forty-six reports appeared in a self-published format that we put out. It was very important to us that they appear in a published form that was physical, and not just digital, as we wanted something that people could hand to their doctors, their loved ones, their congressional representatives.
These forty-six reports broke huge stories. We learned that Pfizer knew within three months after rollout in December 2020, that the vaccines did not work to stop COVID. Pfizer’s language was “vaccine failure” and “failure of efficacy.” One of the most common “adverse events” in the Pfizer documents is “COVID.”
Pfizer knew that the vaccine materials—lipid nanoparticles, an industrial fat, coated in polyethylene glycol, a petroleum byproduct; mRNA; and spike protein—did not remain in the deltoid muscle, as claimed by all spokespeople. Rather, it dispersed throughout the body in forty-eight hours “like a shotgun blast,” as one of the authors, Dr. Robert Chandler, put it; it crossed every membrane in the human body—including the blood-brain barrier—and accumulated in the liver, adrenals, spleen, brain, and, if one is a woman, in the ovaries. Dr. Chandler saw no mechanism whereby those materials leave the body, so every injection appears to pack more such materials into organs.
Pfizer hired 2,400 fulltime staffers to help process “the large increase of adverse event reports” being submitted to the company’s Worldwide Safety database.
Pfizer knew by April 2021 that the injections damaged the hearts of young people.
Pfizer knew by February 28, 2021—just ninety days after the public rollout of their COVID vaccine—that its injection was linked to a myriad of adverse events. Far from being “chills,” “fever,” “fatigue,” as the CDC and other authorities claimed were the most worrying side effects, the actual side effects were catastrophically serious.
These side effects included: death (which Pfizer does list as a “serious adverse event”). Indeed, over 1,233 deaths in first three months of the drug being publicly available.
Severe COVID-19; liver injury; neurological adverse events; facial paralysis; kidney injury; autoimmune diseases; chilblains (a localized form of vasculitis that affects the fingers and toes); multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (when more than one organ system is failing at once); the activation of dormant herpes zoster infections; skin and mucus membrane lesions; respiratory issues; damaged lung structure; respiratory failure; acute respiratory distress syndrome (a lung injury in which fluid leaks from the blood vessels into the lung tissue, causing stiffness which makes it harder to breathe and causes a reduction of oxygen and carbon dioxide exchange); and SARS (or SARS-CoV-1, which had not been seen in the world since 2004, but appears in the Pfizer documents as a side effect of the injections).
Thousands of people with arthritis-type joint pain, the one of most common side effect, were recorded. Other thousands with muscle pain, the second most common. Then, industrial-scale blood diseases: blood clots, lung clots, leg clots; thrombotic thrombocytopenia, a clotting disease of the blood vessels; vasculitis (the destruction of blood vessels via inflammation); astronomical rates of neurological disorders—dementias, tremors, Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, epilepsies. Horrific skin conditions. A florid plethora of cardiac issues; myocarditis, pericarditis, tachycardia, arrhythmia, and so on. Half of the serious adverse events related to the liver, including death, took place within seventy-two hours of the shot. Half of the strokes took place within forty-eight hours of injection.
But what really emerged from the first forty-six reports, was the fact that though COVID is ostensibly a respiratory disease, the papers did not focus on lungs or mucus membranes, but rather they center, creepily and consistently, on disrupting human reproduction. (xiv-xv)
It is in the meaty 34 chapters that follow that all this is discussed and documented in great detail. Just some of the chapter titles can be mentioned here:
Two: “Nine Months Post-COVID mRNA ‘Vaccine’ Rollout, Substantial Birth Rate Drops in 13 European Countries, England/Wales, Australia, and Taiwan.”
Six: “542 Neurological Adverse Events, 95% serious, in First 90 Days of Pfizer mRNA Vaccine Rollout. 16 Deaths. Females Suffered AEs More Than Twice As Often As Males.”
Nine: “449 Patients Suffer Bell’s Palsy Following Pfizer mRNA COVID Vaccination in Initial Three Months of Rollout. A One-Year-Old Endured Bell’s Palsy After Unauthorised Injection.”
Fifteen: “Pfizer and FDA Knew in Early 2021 That Pfizer mRNA COVID “Vaccine” Caused Dire Fetal and Infant Risks, Including Death. They Began an Aggressive Campaign to Vaccinate Pregnant Women Anyway.”
Nineteen: “Pfizer Knew by November 2020 That Its mRNA COVID Vaccine Was Neither Safe Nor Effective. Here Is What Pfizer’s Employees and Contractors Knew and When They Knew It.”
Twenty-One: “Women Suffered 94% of Dermatological Adverse Events Reported in First 90 Days of Pfizer COVID “Vaccine” Rollout. 80% of These Adverse Events Were Categorized As ‘Serious’.”
Twenty-Five: “23% of Vaccinated Mothers’ Foetuses or Neonates Died. Suppressed Lactation and Breast Milk Discoloration Reported.”
Thirty-One: “WarRoom/DailyClout Researchers Find Pfizer Delayed Recording Vaccinated Deaths at Critical Juncture of EUA Process. Improper Delays in Reporting Deaths in the Vaccinated Led FDA to Misstate Vaccine’s Effectiveness, Influenced EUA Grant Decision.”
Thirty-Two: “Pfizer’s ‘Post-Marketing Surveillance’ Shows mRNA-Vaccinated Suffered 1000s of COVID Cases in 1st 90 Days of Vaccine Rollout. Most Infections in the Vaccinated Categorized as ‘Serious Adverse Events’.”
These titles give the reader a clear indication of the sorts of issues treated in this book. And in some 400 pages, there is a wealth of documentation and source material. Even if just some of these claims are fully substantiated, that should be enough to give us all cause for concern.
Afterword
As to this matter of substantiation, this book is of course getting plenty of criticism from all the usual suspects. No surprises there. But some folks who claim to be in the conservative camp have taken shots at it as well, including looking at Wolf’s past writings on other topics, and that there are inaccuracies to be found in her new book. One such person made those remarks on a social media page, so I offered the following response:
A few brief points, as I am going through her book at the moment:
-People can and do change (think Trump, eg. – or even myself). The earlier Wolf I had little time for. The more recent Wolf I find much more palatable.
-[This fellow] offers critiques of a handful of claims made by Naomi – out of many hundreds – that he says are incorrect and then basically says we cannot trust her, full stop, on anything. Really?
-I would think that even if just 90% or 80% of this book’s findings are accurate, it would still warrant a careful read of it, and not an outright dismissal.
-I will keep reading it, and encouraging others to have a read as well, and let them decide for themselves.
And that is essential. Instead of having her detractors deter readers from investigating this book and its claims, we should be encouraging others to check it out for themselves. While we might not all be medical experts, we can at least see the case that is being made here.
And given that all this is based on Pfizer’s own internal documents – 450,000 pages worth – we all should take seriously what is being presented in this book.
[1427 words]