When the Activists Spill the Beans
In the culture wars one side affirms the Judeo-Christian worldview, which includes upholding values like truth-telling, honesty and fairness. The other side, the secular humanists, do not necessarily buy those values, and are often quite happy to lie, mislead, deceive and tell mega-porkies to push through their radical agendas.
The other side fights dirty, in other words. But every once in a while we nonetheless get some candour out of the activists. Now and then they will open up and tell us what they are really thinking, and what their plans really are. Sometimes they actually spill the beans and let us know what their real plans and purposes are, and how happy they are to lie to get there.
I document some of this rare honesty in my book, but we find more examples every now and then which are well worth sharing. Here are two more examples. The first comes from the US, and is a very open admission of how the activists are more than happy to tell utter lies as they look you straight in the eye.
One report runs as follows: “As the same-sex ‘marriage’ battle heats up again in New York, one writer at a prominent gay news source is questioning why his lobby refuses to admit that the gay agenda involves ‘indoctrinating’ schoolchildren to accept homosexuality.
“Queerty contributor Daniel Villarreal criticized (WARNING site contains inappropriate images) the homosexual movement’s knee-jerk reaction against accusations of meddling in public schools. Villarreal pointed to a recent National Organization for Marriage (NOM) ad launched in New York that points out how homosexual indoctrination has been introduced in Massachusetts and California schools.
“While gay activists usually deny that they want to indoctrinate children, said Villarreal, ‘let’s face it—that’s a lie. We want educators to teach future generations of children to accept queer sexuality. In fact, our very future depends on it,’ he wrote.
“Villarreal pointed to the tactics of a gay activist group FCKH8, which fought a recent Tennessee bill prohibiting classroom discussion of homosexuality in grade school by ‘hir[ing]some little girls to drop F-bombs’ in their controversial online ad campaign, and handing out gay paraphernalia to schoolchildren. ‘Recruiting children? You bet we are,’ he said. ‘Why would we push anti-bullying programs or social studies classes that teach kids about the historical contributions of famous queers unless we wanted to deliberately educate children to accept queer sexuality as normal?’
“In fact, Villarreal said that his dream of increasing not only the acceptance, but the future practice of homosexuality among youngsters was common among those in the gay lobby. ‘I and a lot of other people want to indoctrinate, recruit, teach, and expose children to queer sexuality AND THERE’S NOTHING WRONG WITH THAT,’ he wrote.”
Nope, nothing wrong at all with lying if it serves the cause. Lenin, Stalin and the Communists said exactly the same thing before the militant homosexual lobby sprang on the scene. Morality for the Marxists was whatever advanced the “class struggle”. Whatever advanced their cause was the right thing to do.
My second example comes closer to home. In May 2012 the annual Sydney Writers’ Festival was held. It included a panel discussion by homosexual authors, including Masha Gessen, Russian author and journalist. Her remarks about how marriage must change are revealing, even if consistent with what so many other homosexual activists have been saying. This is what she had to say:
“It’s a no-brainer that we should have the right to marry, but I also think equally that it’s a no-brainer that the institution of marriage should not exist [cheers from the audience]. That causes my brain some trouble. And part of why it causes me trouble is because fighting for gay marriage generally involves lying about what we are going to do with marriage when we get there—because we lie that the institution of marriage is not going to change, and that is a lie. The institution of marriage is going to change, and it should change. And again, I don’t think it should exist. And I don’t like taking part in creating fictions about my life. That’s sort of not what I had in mind when I came out thirty years ago. I have three kids who have five parents, more or less, and I don’t see why they shouldn’t have five parents legally…. [After my divorce,] I met my new partner, and she had just had a baby, and that baby’s biological father is my brother, and my daughter’s biological father is a man who lives in Russia, and my adopted son also considers him his father. So the five parents break down into two groups of three…. And really, I would like to live in a legal system that is capable of reflecting that reality. And I don’t think that’s compatible with the institution of marriage.”
That marriage will radically change is of course clear, as I have been documenting all along. But notice her candid admission: “fighting for gay marriage generally involves lying about what we are going to do with marriage when we get there—because we lie that the institution of marriage is not going to change, and that is a lie.”
Yep, nothing like admitting that to be fully open with the public on how they plan to destroy marriage and family would make their case too hard to make, so they must lie to sneak their sinister agendas through. At least she spilled the beans here.
Of course we have known this all along. But it is nice when the militants come out and tell us what they really intend to do. And it is clear they intend to destroy marriage and family, remake society in their own perverted image, and actively target our children.
I for one cannot just sit by and allow this to happen. As a parent, a lover of freedom, and a supporter of marriage and family, I will continue to resist those who have declared war on everything I hold near and dear. If enough people wake up to the war we are in, we might be able to turn things around.
And having the occasional candid homosexual spilling the beans does help I must say.
8 Replies to “When the Activists Spill the Beans”
Pro-homosexual writer Masha Gessen appears to be fiercely opposed to lying and believing in lies. “And part of why it causes me trouble is because fighting for gay marriage generally involves lying about what we are going to do with marriage when we get there—because we lie that the institution of marriage is not going to change, and that is a lie. The institution of marriage is going to change, and it should change. And again, I don’t think it should exist. And I don’t like taking part in creating fictions about my life.”
Sadly, she IS taking part in creating fictions about her life.
Romans 1:24-25 Therefore God gave them up in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, to the dishonoring of their bodies among themselves, because they exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever! Amen.
Yes quite so Annette.
Bill Muehlenberg, CultureWatch
Here is an excellent website describing the horrors of SSM and the effect it has on society.
I’ve noticed even on FB there is a concerted effort to indoctrinate with historical examples and picture with emotionally appealing captions.
One in particular which I looked into was Alan Turing who was supposedly vilified for being homosexual and committed suicide as a result. But there is good evidence that he didn’t commit suicide but was killed by inhalation from one of his experiments;
But historical facts will be in increasingly short supply when there is an emotionally appealing narrative to sell.
If the gay male culture is not monogamous then they want marriage but they don’t want marriage.
Rachel Smith, UK
I second Ian’s link it’s an excellent resource on GM.
And it’s a no brainer how she wants to change the institution of Marriage, to suit her troublesome disorderly problematic life. How arrogant is that.
It has been interesting to see the online comments on my occasional comment that the most obvious objection to same-sex marriage is the physical difference between males and females. Comments are of of the order of “Why are you bringing sex into the question?” “We’re not talking about sex but about love”. And so on.
A letter in our local paper this week said that opponents of same-sex marriage don’t take biological differences sufficiently into account. Eh???
At that stage I usually give up for a while. I don’t think I’m being unfair in saying that as well as lying and misleading, many same-sex marriage proponents seem to have very little use for their brains.