Israel and the Myth of Moral Equivalence

I was actually asked by a Christian recently why I was taking sides in the current Israel-Hamas conflict. I was rather taken back by that one I must admit. It seemed to me that one might as well ask why one took sides in the Second World War. You see, this comment and those like it, which we hear so often, are based on the bogus notion of moral equivalence.

And what do we mean by this? It means that when we compare – in this case – Israel with Hamas and the surrounding Arab nations, we have to say each one is no better than the other. They are identical, morally speaking. We cannot say one is better than the other.

‘Yes Hamas and the Muslim world may have some bad eggs, but so too does Israel.’ So therefore we cannot criticise Hamas and the others, unless we are willing to criticise Israel in equal measure. This is the faulty and pernicious notion of moral equivalence.

Israel-CrosshairsIt is used all the time by the secular left and by not very discerning Christians. Its last major usage was during the Cold War. The same sloppy thinking and mushy moralising took place then. ‘Yes Communist Russia has some bad eggs, but so too does America. Yes the Marxist world is not perfect, but neither is the West. Yes, socialism kills, but so does capitalism.’

On and on it goes. These useful idiots, as Lenin called them, could not see any moral difference between the free West and the tyrannical Marxist hell holes. And we have the same situation today with Israel. These clueless wonders cannot see any moral difference between a free Israel and the tyrannical Muslim hell holes.

And many of these secular lefties have even moved beyond moral equivalence. They in fact actually believe that Israel is worse than Hamas and the Muslim world. Many of these guys actually believe Israel is the bad guy, the aggressor, the bully, while the surrounding Muslim nations are the good guys. So they have moved well beyond moral equivalence to making Israel the great Satan here, and the other nations paragons of virtue.

My critic went on to say, in full moral equivalence style, “Both sides in this conflict seem to be behaving abominably.” Umm, no – not even close. Again, one might as well foolishly suggest that both the Allies and the Nazis were behaving equally abominably.

The truth is, one side during WWII was clearly the epitome of evil, while the other side was on the side of what was right. That did not mean the Allies were pristine and fault free, but compared to who they were fighting, they were angels of light.

Israel is also not perfect, but compared to who she is up against, she is looking pretty good actually. So let me try to dispel the myth of moral equivalence in simple form here, by highlighting a few obvious contrasts:

-Israel is simply trying to exist and defend itself, while it is surrounded by nations (as well as Hamas in Gaza) who want to see it driven into the sea. The Hamas Charter for example specifically says Israel must be destroyed.
-Israel since its inception in 1948 has always been willing to make great compromises with its neighbours, while Arab leadership has always demanded the expulsion of the Jews.
-Israel has a number of times now traded land for peace, but generally to no avail.
-Israel is a nation of 8 million people surrounded by over 300 million hostile people.
-Israel would disappear if she were to lay down her arms, but if the Arabs laid down their arms, there would be peace in the Middle East.
-Israel is the last bulwark against Islamist imperialism in the region.
-Israel has a million plus Arabs living in its midst, while Gaza has no Jews living there.
-Israel uses weapons to defend its children, while Hamas uses children to defend its weapons.
-Israel does all it can to protect innocent civilians both in Gaza and Israel, while Hamas deliberately targets innocent civilians both in Gaza and Israel. Setting up command and control centres in or near hospitals, schools and mosques is standard Hamas practice. Israel is not doing this at all.
-Israel is shipping tonnes of food, water, medical and humanitarian supplies into Gaza, and even treats wounded Hamas terrorists, while Hamas would never dream of doing this.
-Israel has kept every single cease fire until Hamas has violated them – and they have violated every single truce in this conflict thus far.
-Israel even has women leading the country, while they are mere chattel in the surrounding Arab world.
-Israel is the only genuinely free, democratic and pluralistic nation in the region.
-Israel is an outpost of civilisation in a place of barbarism.

Plenty of other contrasts could be mentioned here. So am I saying that Israel is perfect and can do no wrong? Of course not. She often gets things wrong, but a bit of perspective is needed here. A bit of moral clarity is needed as well. And a bit of historical perspective also could help.

Israel has of course been in this land off and on for three thousand years. She has endured plenty of harrowing experiences over the centuries. And now she is surrounded by a host of nations which have vowed to destroy her. Also she has a bit of recent history to still fully and properly digest. If you had just recently gone through something like the Holocaust, then it is fully understandable that you might be a bit testy and on edge as well.

Notice that I have not made one appeal to Scripture here, to biblical prophecy, or to any type of theology. Arguments about Israel’s place in God’s divine order of things is not my concern at present. What I offer in this post is merely the secular case for Israel, and why it differs enormously from its enemies.

There is just no comparison between the two, and those who either ignorantly or deliberately try to drag up a spurious and unhelpful moral equivalence here are in fact taking sides no matter how much they deny they are doing so. They are effectively taking sides with the enemies of Israel when they foolishly claim the two are morally identical.

Postscript

And as a perfect example of the very thing I have been talking about, this classic case of idiotic moral equivalence just came to my attention:

Opposition assistant treasury spokesman Andrew Leigh said the image was “horrendous” and noted “extremism comes in all sorts of guises”. “We need to celebrate the Australian Muslim community to recognise that there are many peoples of different faiths in the world and extremism comes in all sorts of guises. The Oklahoma bombing was carried out by a Christian.”

This comment, from the Australian, refers to the shocking photo of the young son of a Sydney jihadist holding the decapitated head of a victim in Syria. Just as I said above: ‘Yeah, Islam has its bad eggs, but so too does everyone else.’

Utter baloney. Not only was McVeigh not a Christian, but he is the only non-Muslim terrorist these mental midgets can come up with. Every day we find more Islamic bloodshed and terror, but all these guys can do is point to an event which took place two decades ago. Useful idiots indeed.

www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/barbaric-image-of-khaled-sharroufs-son-a-warning-to-the-world-tony-abbott/story-fn59niix-1227020303828?nk=b9d541189375aa40b8eb2dd3990b8bdc

[1242 words]

10 Replies to “Israel and the Myth of Moral Equivalence”

  1. My only quibble is that the last major use of moral equivalence was, imho, during the war in Croatia and Bosnia when the West blamed all sides even though there was a clear aggressor – the Serbs – that had a policy of ethnic cleansing and genocide. When Croatia (and then Bosnia) fought back against the Serbs in 1995, the Serbs claimed to be “victims”, and the media lapped it up the same way they now lap up Palestinian portrayals of themselves as victims. In both cases, civilians were victims of their own leadership.

  2. The Gaza war seems to be a distraction. The Muslim Brotherhood is operating in Syria and is seeking to establish a caliphate. Both Hamas and ISIS are offshoots of the MB. While people are focusing on one they aren’t focusing on the other.

    The crisis stretches through a number of countries throughout North Africa and the Middle East. Boko Harem (Nigeria) and Seleka (Central African Republic) are also part of the same movement.

    The Muslim World could theoretically take out Israel if they were united (although I’d place my wager on the Jewish state), Gaza could not. Iran is preparing a nuclear weapon and ISIS is transforming into a super terror state while people are drawn to another Israeli/Gaza conflict.

  3. Go here http://www.idfblog.com/about-the-idf/idf-code-of-ethics/ to see the high standards which members of the Israel Defense Forces are required to uphold in carrying out their duties.

    The argument is simple; either you support a Western-style democratic nation in its fight against aggression, or you support a regime of depraved barbarians whose morality is dredged up from the sludge in the sewers of Hell.

    I venture a guess that the position one takes may have a bearing on the day of judgement as to where one spends eternity.

  4. I really appreciate your blog site Mr. Bill Muehlenberg, it’s so refreshing to hear the truth for a change amongst the lefty trendy PC controlled media. Keep up the great work!!

  5. Bill
    Also Richard Marles, ‘the Opposition talking clock on Immigration,’ who flaps on hopelessly against Scott Morrison, was using the same talking points as his colleague, Andrew Leigh.
    As you rightly point out McVeigh was not a Christian and he is the only non-Muslim terrorist that these clowns can find.
    Lenin was only half right: Marles and Leigh are useless idiots.

  6. Richard Marles is my local (Federal) MP (Corio). Whilst in person he seems a nice enough bloke his head is clearly in the left field. He is also on record as supporting gay “marriage” a couple of years back when MP’s were given the conscience vote.
    Mick Koster

  7. “-Israel uses weapons to defend its children, while Hamas uses children to defend its weapons.”

    such a true statement…..

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: