Christianity and Suicide

With the push for the legalisation of euthanasia being made throughout the West, Christians need to think carefully and biblically about this issue. My forthcoming book, The Challenge of Euthanasia, will certainly offer plenty of detailed argumentation – both biblical and secular – against this.

The issue of suicide is of course a major part of this whole debate. For the believer, we need to see what Scripture has to say about the subject. Critics will point out that the Bible does not say too much about suicide. However it does offer a number of cases of suicide, and all are viewed in a very dim light indeed.

The first case is that of the wicked ruler Abimelech (Judges 9:50-56). Another case involves Ahithophel, a traitorous counsellor to David (2 Samuel 17:23). A third case involves Zimri, an evil king (1 Kings 16:15-20). The fourth clear case, one that is that of Saul who the Lord had abandoned (1 Samuel 31, and 2 Samuel 1). A fifth Old Testament case might be mentioned, but it really runs in tandem with the death of Saul: his armour-bearer who also fell on his sword (1 Samuel 31:5).

suicide saulAnother possible case of suicide might be that of Samson as found in Judges 16:30. But it is certainly not clear that he intended to end his life as such. This seems to have been an unintended consequence of wreaking revenge on his (God’s) enemies.

But from all these cases we find people who were said to be evil or out of God’s favour committing an act which has no biblical endorsement. So from these episodes alone we draw no support nor approval for suicide. I will examine these cases at length in my new book, but I have spoken to them in some detail here as well: billmuehlenberg.com/2006/09/14/suicide-a-biblical-assessment/

Thus there are no Scriptural passages which can be appealed to in support of suicide. Interestingly, the Christian church, with very few exceptions, has seen suicide as sinful, from the earliest times through to today. Augustine and Aquinas for example said that suicide was worse than murder, because at least the murderer can turn around and repent, whereas the one who commits suicide cannot.

Moreover, Christians have almost always seen suicide as a personal affront to the sovereignty of God in the affairs of human life. And it is not just Christianity that has condemned suicide. The pre-Christian Hippocratic Oath, for example, also condemns not only suicide but euthanasia as well.

Other arguments can be brought forth in the attempt to justify suicide. However, none of them, it seems to me, are really convincing. For example, one might raise the issue of heroic self-sacrifice, such as when a soldier jumps on a live hand grenade in order to save his companions. But this should not be seen as suicide however. The intent was not to kill oneself, but to save others. In suicide one’s intention is to kill oneself.

Nor is martyrdom to be equated with suicide. If someone dies for his beliefs (such as a Christian martyr), he is remaining faithful to Christ, even at the cost of his or her own life. Again his intention is not to take his or her life, but to be willing to die for his faith. (The case of radical Muslim suicide bombers does however seem much more like suicide – with the promise of paradise and dark-eyed virgins at the other end. But that is another discussion.)

In the end we must come down on the Biblical side of the debate. Emotions and particular cases of course cannot be dismissed altogether, but neither should they take precedence when we consider these weighty issues. Our final authority on all such matters must be the revealed word of God, not the latest social theories or tragic personal stories.

Vernon Grounds summarises the longstanding opposition to suicide in Christian thought. It rests

upon an extrapolation from the Sixth Commandment, “Thou shall not kill” (Exod. 20:13; cf. Gen. 9:6). Human life is God’s sovereign gift. Crassly stated, it is his property; and, as divinely bestowed, it is of measureless though not absolute value. Only God, consequently, is entitled to determine when and how life is to end. Thus its termination, whether by illness or old age or accident, is under his providential control.

He notes some exceptions, such as martyrdom, and then continues: “But, aside from a few cases of these sorts, to end one’s life intentionally is to be guilty of lese majesty, rebelliously usurping God’s prerogative.”

A piece written a few years ago by Emily Esfahani Smith offers some historical perspective on these matters. She states:

In my column last October, I pointed to research—from Durkheim and modern social science—showing that the rise of suicide has been accompanied by a rise in individualism. The role of the individual in society has changed dramatically since the Enlightenment. Before, the influence of the Judeo-Christian tradition in the West placed moral constraints on an individual’s will. Morality was organized around God’s will and our duties to the community—and suicide was considered an affront to both. Today, though, our sense of right and wrong is organized more around the individual’s experience than on the health of the community.

She concludes:

Our attitude toward suicide says a lot about how we value life and the communities that sustain us. It shouldn’t surprise us that suicide has gained acceptance in our culture; our communities are dissolving, and the individual, free from many of the traditional constraints, is considered the master of his own fate. Though there are certainly cases when death is justly considered a deliverance from suffering, it’s time to reconsider our belief that, as individuals, we are free to choose the time and place of that deliverance. As Hecht writes, “The meaning of life is bigger than the individual.”

Let me finish with the wise words of renowned Christian thinker and apologist G. K. Chesterton. In his classic 1908 volume Orthodoxy he says this about suicide:

Not only is suicide a sin, it is the sin. It is the ultimate and absolute evil, the refusal to take an interest in existence; the refusal to take the oath of loyalty to life. The man who kills a man, kills a man. The man who kills himself, kills all men; as far as he is concerned he wipes out the world….
Obviously a suicide is the opposite of a martyr. A martyr is a man who cares so much for something outside him, that he forgets his own personal life. A suicide is a man who cares so little for anything outside him, that he wants to see the last of everything. One wants something to begin: the other wants everything to end. In other words, the martyr is noble, exactly because (however he renounces the world or execrates all humanity) he confesses this ultimate link with life; he sets his heart outside himself: he dies that something may live. The suicide is ignoble because he has not this link with being: he is a mere destroyer; spiritually, he destroys the universe.

Of course for those who have lost loved ones or family members to suicide we need to offer them our prayerful support and sympathy. But at a time when legalised euthanasia is being promoted so intensely, we must resist the agenda of the death lobby and reaffirm biblical truth in this important area.

www.newcriterion.com/articles.cfm/The-catastrophe-of-suicide-7902

[1241 words]

4 Replies to “Christianity and Suicide”

  1. There is a big difference between a Kamakazi pilot, a Muslim suicide bomber who are dead sacrifices and a Christian who is called to be a living sacrifice.

    Romans 12 I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that ye present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service.

    The Christian is called to die to themselves daily and you cannot do that if you are already dead!

    David Skinner UK

  2. I think maybe the support for people who are contemplating suicide isn’t often what it should be. The stresses of life today are enormous; a lot of suicides occur from absolute despair (often financial) and no-one to turn to. That doesn’t excuse it, but having suffered from considerable depression myself in past decades, I can see how easily it can happen.
    As for the euthanasia thing, I encountered my first pro-euthanasia person last weekend. A young woman who thinks that the British NHS has made too good a job of keeping the elderly alive, when they should have just been allowed to die from their conditions. I assume that, in her world, people shouldn’t be allowed to be ill and certainly not be treated once they reach (say)70. They cost the country too much money (she thinks).

  3. Very good, Bill. Looking forward to your book.
    There is a link in this, i tend to think, between abortion & euthanasia.
    Abortion is the beginning of legalized killing.
    It desensitizes society for the next step, which is euthanasia which is also killing, albeit in some regards redefined as ‘assisted suicide’.
    You might want to explore this as well.
    Up to you!

  4. Thank you Mr Muehlenberg for pushing this discussion – encouraging critical thought and the exchange of thinking. It is obvious, and to our ignorance, that we can only imagine the state of mind of one who completes suicide. My work with The Samaritans & others in the past suggested that nobody wants or prefers death to life per se but equally nobody would prefer he pain of living through some Hell on earth to the prospect of being freed from it. A Hope for better in the future – even if just for those left behind – might be what tips the balance at the crucial decision.
    Consider Socrates, whom Screwtape suggests was also raised up by The Enemy. He advised that “It is not living that matters but living rightly”. And his was not the typical suicide – certainly not ignoble.
    Underlying all of this I think, especially in The West, is an unGodly, and thus inadequate, attitude toward death in all its forms. Please write more about this?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: