Sanger, Obama and Evil

One of the most evil and despicable persons on the planet was Margaret Sanger, the American eugenicist (1879-1966). She of course is the founder of Planned Parenthood International, the world’s largest provider of abortion. While she may not be a household name, she certainly should be.

You see, the leader of the free world and President of the United States of America, Barack Hussein Obama, is one of the greatest fans of PP and by extension, Margaret Sanger. Indeed, the grizzly and barbaric details of what baby killer and infanticide advocate Kermit Gosnell has been up to fit in perfectly here.

The horrors of eugenics, so prominently on display during the reign of the Nazis and the Holocaust, was in large measure undergirded and supported by the writings of Margaret Sanger. And her evil work and ideology is still being fully carried out by PP today, and by baby killers like Gosnell.

And by fully supportive Presidents like Obama. Obama himself of course has been 100 per cent in support of abortion and even infanticide. Consider his past track record on this issue. He has opposed banning partial-birth abortions and he has opposed an Illinois bill recognizing the human rights of babies who have been ‘born alive’ after botched abortions.

And this is not the first time he has spoken at a PP dinner. He is a proud supporter of these mass baby-killers, and will once again be giving it his full approval later this week. Here is how one news report covers this: “Amid new concerns about the brutality of illegal forms of abortions, President Obama plans to deliver the keynote address at Planned Parenthood Federation of America’s annual fundraising dinner Thursday.

“The theme of the dinner, to be held in Washington, is a ‘Time for Care,’ organizers announced. Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards said Mr. Obama has done more than any president in history for women’s health and rights so she is delighted to have him help promote the gala dinner with his presence.”

Wait, stop right there. Did you just read that? “Time for Care”? In what must be one of the most appalling cases of Orwellian Double Speak, these baby butchers are actually talking about care? I can just see Hitler and the Nazis holding an annual dinner, with the proud slogan, “Time for Care”. It would be just as appropriate for the Nazis to fling that phrase around as it would be for PP.

As former PP worker Abby Johnson has just written, “I just recently found out that Obama will keynote Planned Parenthood’s annual gala this year. It was at this event 4 years ago that I was given Planned Parenthood’s ‘Employee of the Year Award.’ I watched as Hillary Clinton received their ‘Margaret Sanger Award’…you know the woman who said her goal was ‘exterminate’ African-Americans. Anyway, now this year, they will give out the same award with our AFRICAN-AMERICAN President in attendance. And he will clap and be so proud of the work that Planned Parenthood boasts about.”

Abby of course now is a tireless pro-life campaigner. I discuss her amazing story here:

But since most readers know hardly anything about Sanger, let me simply offer a few quotes from her. They are fully representative of her work and beliefs, and are diabolical in the extreme:

“The most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”

“The handicapped, including the blind, deaf, dumb, mute and epileptics, are the dead weight of human waste.”

“I cannot refrain from saying that women must come to recognize there is some function of womanhood other than being a child-bearing machine.”

“[Woman’s] instincts are fundamentally creative, not destructive. But her sex-bondage has made her the dumb instrument of the monster she detests. For centuries she has populated the earth in ignorance and without restraint, in vast numbers and with staggering rapidity. She has become not the mother of a nobler race, but a mere breeding machine grinding out a humanity which fills insane asylums, almshouses and sweat shops, and provides cannon fodder that tyrants may rise to power on the sacrifice of her offspring.”

“Women of the working class, especially wage workers, should not have more than two children at most. The average working man can support no more and the average working woman can take care of no more in decent fashion.”

And consider a few other choice quotes from the magazine she edited, the Birth Control Review:

“Our civilization at present has neither the courage to kill them [children] outright quickly, cleanly and painlessly, nor the heart and courage and ability to give them what they need.”

“If there is no ideal method of birth control, then there ought to be. The eugenist, the sociologist, the hospital and charity worker, the penologist, the specialist in tuberculosis, epilepsy, bone deformities, heart and kidney diseases, not only has the right but it is his duty to demand: ‘Tell us, and at once, what we can do to prevent the multiplication of the imbecile, the epileptic, the consumptive, the host of mental, moral and physical defectives and perverts who are increasing so much more rapidly than the more normal members of the community’.”

“Instead of calling birth control among the poor and deficient a crime, it should be preached to them as a sacred duty. The laws must be changed.”

“When birth control is fully understood, we will have a finer and more perfect race.”

Hmmm, where did we hear all that before? Oh yeah, the Nazis again. Sanger, Gosnell, Obama – they are all birds of a feather. They are all tarred with the same diabolical brush of baby killing and hatred of life. Remarking on the Gosnell trial, Lila Rose of Live Action commented, “These accounts by former clinic staff have shell-shocked the nation, and it is incumbent upon the president to reconsider his support for the abortion industry and Planned Parenthood, which last year profited from abortion $87 million committing over 300,000 abortions.”

Exactly right. But instead he will roll up and give them his full approval. In Proverbs 6:16-17 we are told that the Lord hates the shedding of innocent blood. Obama will not be held guiltless here. Nor will Gosnell, nor Sanger, nor PP.

Nor will all those deceived Christians who actually voted for this man, even twice: the most pro-death US President ever.

[1069 words]

13 Replies to “Sanger, Obama and Evil”

  1. Double speak, and half speak, and meaningless emotive slogans, plus downright lies and quarter-truths, are the hallmark of the abortionists, the same-sex marriage proponents, and the other anti-life and anti-decency brigade. No doubt they deliberately avoid normal language use in order to avoid debate and proper scrutiny of their ravings.

    Truth is out, lies are in, but we are confident that one day truth will out.

    David Morrison

  2. Operation Negro is one of the most despicable things ever and yet she is praised by those who are Negro. They are Useful idiots.

    Ian Nairn

  3. Recently I had occasion to consult Margaret Sanger’s personal autobiography, as published in 1938 [Searchable digitized copy available on-line at: ]. Imagine my surprise to read her declaring abortion to be an unhealthy state of affairs for which contraception was the cure! Even more surprising, is her report of a conversation shortly after the end of World War I, in Germany, with a male gynaecologist, who preferred abortions over female contraception: Contraception, he claimed handed fertility and population growth control to women! Abortion, he told Ms Sanger, kept population growth and female reproduction in the control of men! Why no-one puts this male chauvinist construction on abortion today puzzles me, especially when male abortion practitioners are not “rare specimens” amid the ranks of the abortion industry!

    Dr Marie Stopes, Margaret Sanger’s British counterpart was also an outspoken opponent of abortion, as her 1938 letter to the Australia’s Brisbane Courier Mail demonstrates [Accessible online at: ]!

    John Wigg

    As usual, presenting only half of the truth regarding Sanger’s and Stopes’ pioneer feminism has proven extremely dangerous, albeit very useful to the cause of sexual licence!

  4. With such recent history of the holocaust, so many people have not learnt anything, horrifies me.
    Supporting the killing of innocent babies up to birth, is so barbaric, and people don’t learn.
    Having Gala dinners to promote their cause?
    Well as more and more of our younger generations are coming out against abortion now, youth from all walks of life, I forsee that many of these like Obama will probably be brought before judges and courts even in this life time, in the near future and held accountable for their inhumanity, just like we saw with the War criminals, the Nazis..
    Loreta Coffey

  5. It seems odd to me that Margaret Sanger would be opposed to abortion when she was outspoken in her support for infanticide, euthanasia and forced sterilization. I suppose in 1938 the skills and tools for abortion had not reached the technical level that they have today and she may have been concerned for the health of the mother. Who knows? Be that as it may, she was none the less a heartless individual.
    Larry Waddell

  6. Dear Larry,
    It is my understanding that the present Pro-Choice analysis of abortion as a tool of women’s liberation and individual autonomy emerged as part of the agenda of the National Organization for Women, a U.S. radical feminist group which began in 1966, the year Margaret Sanger died [ For summary of NOW’s 1967 advocacy of abortion as a woman’s right, go to their web site sub-page at: ].

    After a thorough reading, the Wikipedia article on Margaret Sanger appears well-researched, with more than adequate footnotes and bibliography. The article appears to present a useful introduction to Sanger’s views on abortion, eugenics, sterilization of humans and other issues.

    Certainly, post-World War II proliferation of improved infection control due to the discovery of penicillin and subsequent development of more advanced antibiotics is likely to have reduced some of the hazards hitherto common to post-operative recovery from abortion by surgical D-and-C methods.

    For a perspective of a Pro-Life woman who has personally experienced both sides of the abortion debate, I recommend Abby Johnson’s unPlanned [For a preview go to: ]. Her personal autobiographical account suggests that even “cutting-edge” 21st-Century abortion techniques are not without their “post-procedure complications”.

    John Wigg

  7. And Obama finished by saying “Thank you Planned Parenthood. God bless you”. No, God will not bless these baby butchers, nor will he bless a man who supports it.

    Bill Muehlenberg, CultureWatch

  8. Bill, at a glance one would think that your comments on this topic could be misconstrued as being over the top by including Hitler into the argument. But the fact is, you probably aren’t aware how close to the truth you really are. You see in a recent movie called “Downfall” – a hard hitting factual account about the events surrounding Hitler’s last days – included an account by the actual Hitler’s personal secretary who admitted that even though she was very close to Hitler, she never knew about the Holocaust and was horrified about what she learnt about it year’s later. So too now many of the world’s population would be very unaware to the Holocaust that is occurring in their unsuspecting midst. When you refer to abortion as to what it is, most people would never suspect that it is the late term abortions that are happening and the recent findings of what Gosnells did should be told so that it will never happen again. The media won’t report it because it is not a popular story. But enough pressure by the people through the politicians will show the media just how popular such a story is and how it does not matter how sophisticated a society can be, there is a depraved and evil side that spreads like a cancer. The question then would be, “is there anyone out there who cares and is willing to do something about it?”
    Paul Hotchkin

  9. Talk about an evil organisation this Planned Parenthood. Just look at some picture aimed at 10 year olds for “sex ed”

    I have linked directly to the images, but they are available for you to click from there. They are utterly pornographic and basically are there to groom children to have sex. I thought grooming was criminal, but if you rename it as “sex ed” then it is okay. According to Dr Judith Reisman this is one of the first steps that paedophiles use to seduce children. This is a paedophiles wet dream since the education system is doing the heavy lifting for them. Considering all “sex ed” comes from the same source, the strategy here would be very similar. This is absolutely outrageous that such a thing is happening and they wonder why children are having so many problem with sexual problems.

    Ian Nairn

  10. Planned parenthood love to provide their perverted “sex education” because it provides them with their next generation of abortion customers by enticing children into getting pregnant. As the Bible states, the love of money is the root of all evil.
    Mario Del Giudice

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: