CultureWatch

Bill Muehlenberg's commentary on issues of the day...

This is Just Beastly

May 20, 2013

The shouts for “marriage equality” and “equal love” continue unabated. Of course they have nothing to do with genuine marriage or real love, and everything to do with radical social engineering and kinky sexuality. And as we have been warning for decades now, once you start messing with marriage, soon anything goes.

And that is exactly what is now happening. All sorts of groups are demanding that their perverse sexual preferences be fully recognised, supported and given government endorsement. I have documented this both in my book, Strained Relations, and on my website.

As these demands are never-ending, so my coverage of all this will have to be never-ending. So let me look again at another “love” which is quickly and proudly coming out of the closet. Sadly there are now many calling for the legalisation of bestiality, or zoophilia. Yes, there is even a “scientific” name now assigned to those who want to enjoy “equal love” with animals.

And these are not just a few cranks and misfits. Sadly we have academics, educational institutions, and plenty of other respectable type groups calling for this. Indeed, simply google the euphemistic term “zoophilia”. When I last did this some 1.2 million hits came up. There are all sorts of zoophilia sites, organisations, groups, societies and advocates out there seriously promoting all this.

In fact, there is far too much material here for me to do proper justice to it, so let me just select a few representative examples. Let’s begin with this headline: “Those Who Practice Bestiality Say They’re Part of the Next Sexual Rights Movement.” The headline alone says it all: If the homosexual lobby can get their way with full recognition and legalisation, then why can’t we?

The article speaks of a Cody Beck who is quite serous in seeing his “rights” recognised: “Being a ‘zoophile’ in modern American society, Beck says, is ‘like being gay in the 1950s. You feel like you have to hide, that if you say it out loud, people will look at you like a freak.’ Now Beck believes he and other members of this minority sexual orientation, who often call themselves ‘zoos,’ can follow the same path as the gay rights movement. Most researchers believe 2 to 8 percent of the population harbors forbidden desires toward animals, and Beck hopes this minority group can begin appealing to the open-minded for acceptance.”

I mentioned that universities and academics are even happy to run with this. Here is another headline to get your head around: “Yale hosts workshop teaching sensitivity to bestiality”. Yes, that would be Yale University. The entire article is so incredible that I am tempted to quote the whole piece. But let me offer this much:

“On Saturday afternoon, Yale hosted a ‘sensitivity training’ in which students were asked to consider topics such as bestiality, incest, and accepting money for sex. During the workshop, entitled, ‘Sex: Am I Normal,’ students anonymously asked and answered questions about sex using their cell phones, and viewed the responses in real time in the form of bar charts. The session was hosted by ‘sexologist’ Dr. Jill McDevitt, who owns a sex store called Feminique in West Chester, Pa. Survey responses revealed that nine percent of attendees had been paid for sex, 3 percent had engaged in bestiality, and 52 percent had participated in ‘consensual pain’ during sex, according to an article published in the Yale Daily News on Monday.

“Event director Giuliana Berry told Campus Reform in an interview on Monday that the workshop was brought to campus to teach students not to automatically judge people who may have engaged in these sorts of activities, but rather to respond with ‘understanding’ and ‘compassion.’ ‘People do engage in some of these activities that we believe only for example perverts engage in,’ she said. ‘What the goal is is to increase compassion for people who may engage in activities that are not what you would personally consider normal.’ McDevitt referred to the range of activities discussed in the workshop as ‘sexual diversity.’ ‘It tries to get people to be more sensitive … to sexual diversity,’ McDevitt told Campus Reform in an interview on Monday. ‘We’re not all heterosexual, able-bodied folks who have standard missionary sex’.”

There you go: we need to offer “understanding” and “compassion” to those who are into zoophilia, or incest, or whatever. And the last thing we should do is cast any moral judgment on any of this: “‘It’s sensitivity training,’ McDevitt told Campus Reform. ‘Don’t judge other people, because we all have something we are embarrassed about’.”

One well respected academic has been quite cavalier about bestiality for years now. I refer to Princeton University’s Ira W. DeCamp Professor of Bioethics, Peter Singer. He is rather infamous for a piece he penned back in 2001 called “Heavy Petting”. The online magazine Nerve, the site where it first appeared, seems to have pulled it, but one can still find the entire article elsewhere. He said this, in part:

“The existence of sexual contact between humans and animals, and the potency of the taboo against it, displays the ambivalence of our relationship with animals. On the one hand, especially in the Judeo-Christian tradition — less so in the East — we have always seen ourselves as distinct from animals, and imagined that a wide, unbridgeable gulf separates us from them. Humans alone are made in the image of God. Only human beings have an immortal soul….

“On the other hand there are many ways in which we cannot help behaving just as animals do — or mammals, anyway — and sex is one of the most obvious ones. We copulate, as they do. They have penises and vaginas, as we do, and the fact that the vagina of a calf can be sexually satisfying to a man shows how similar these organs are. The taboo on sex with animals may, as I have already suggested, have originated as part of a broader rejection of non-reproductive sex.

“But the vehemence with which this prohibition continues to be held, its persistence while other non-reproductive sexual acts have become acceptable, suggests that there is another powerful force at work: our desire to differentiate ourselves, erotically and in every other way, from animals….

“But sex with animals does not always involve cruelty. Who has not been at a social occasion disrupted by the household dog gripping the legs of a visitor and vigorously rubbing its penis against them? The host usually discourages such activities, but in private not everyone objects to being used by her or his dog in this way, and occasionally mutually satisfying activities may develop.”

This guy is actually saying all this with a straight face! And all this is not just theory or speculation. We have already had a number of cases of people “marrying” their beloved animals. As but one Australian example of this, consider this story:

“A young Toowoomba man yesterday tied the knot with his best friend – a five-year-old labrador. In perhaps a first for the Garden City, Laurel Bank Park hosted the wedding of Joseph Guiso and Honey, a labrador he adopted five years ago. Thirty of the couple’s closest friends and family were in attendance for the emotional ceremony, held at dusk.”

The news item continues: “Mr Guiso said as a ‘religious guy’, he could no longer take the guilt of living with Honey out of wedlock. ‘It’s not sexual,’ he assured the onlookers. ‘It’s just pure love.’ The couple is planning a short honeymoon to one of Toowoomba’s parks.”

And to give cat lovers equal space here, consider this story of a German man who married his own cat: “A German man has unofficially married his cat after the animal fell ill and vets told him it might not live much longer, Bild newspaper reports. It says Uwe Mitzscherlich, 39, paid an actress 300 euros (£260,$395) to officiate at the ceremony, as marrying an animal is illegal in Germany.

“Mr Mitzscherlich said he had wanted to tie the knot before his asthmatic cat Cecilia died. The cat and groom have lived together for 10 years. ‘Cecilia is such a trusting creature. We cuddle all the time and she has always slept in my bed,’ Mr Mitzscherlich, a postman from the eastern town of Possendorf, told Bild. Actress Christin-Maria Lohri, who officiated the ceremony, was quoted as saying: ‘At first I thought it was a joke. But for Mr Mitzscherlich it’s a dream come true’.”

Bestiality, zoophilia, and marriage rights with animals then is clearly the next step in the sexual revolution. Albert Camus once said, “A man without ethics is a wild beast loosed upon the world.” In this case it might be more accurate to say, “A man without ethics is a man loosed upon wild beasts.”

www.browardpalmbeach.com/2009-08-20/news/those-who-practice-bestiality-say-they-re-part-of-the-next-gay-rights-movement/
www.campusreform.org/blog/?ID=4646
www.utilitarian.net/singer/by/2001—-.htm
www.thechronicle.com.au/news/man-marrys-dog-city-first-toowoomba/710538/
news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8658327.stm

[1465 words]

12 Responses to This is Just Beastly

  • I’m reading this article over lunch. Perhaps it’s just as well I’m not so easily shocked anymore.

    Ross McPhee

  • 1. Did the “sexologist” declare her vested interest (sex shop)?
    2. “Sensitivity training” is actually a euphemism for desensitisation.

    John Bennett

  • The ways of ancient Canaan and ancient Egypt are upon us again. How our unhappy race has “evolved” – truly a “descent of man” – one which Darwin himself might find surprising!

    John Wigg

  • When and where do this end? When violent criminals are affirmed and we have a society of survival of the fittest?

    We need to examine what is right and what is wrong? We have the bible, the Church, and faith and the laws for a reason; to protect the weak, the vulnerable, etc, and to give thanks to our Maker. We must preserve love, not hate.

    We need to learn what is right and what is wrong all over again. Anything outside of traditional marriage is wrong.

    We can already see what happens when we start to accept anything else. We must protect our children, our future, and our pets, as well as the wild ones.

    We are humans, not wild beasts.

    Erik Ahlblad

  • And people call this the signs of a “progressive, civilised society”? No doubt from here on, these ghastly animal-sex relationships will be classed as part of a “progressive civilised society” and all dissenters will be called intolerant bigots or end up in jail.

    People’s minds and thoughts are degenerating rapidly; there has to be a Day of Reckoning soon, before the remainders of sane folk are totally overpowered. And it probably can’t come too soon.

    Chris Dark

  • Truly shocking. Here, in Australia, thousands march in our streets to support this depravity, while in other countries thousands march against it:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-22571216

    What will it take to mobilise Christians like this? Perhaps Churches teaching what scripture has to say on all this would be a start.

    Denise Abbott

  • Notice how brave these people are? Of course, we all have something we are ashamed of, but instead of that shame leading us to confess it in the light to be forgiven and cleansed, these people want to make these things an excuse and justification for worse things yet. It seems to me the devil is getting rather impatient and wants to bring hell to earth.
    Many blessings
    Ursula Bennett

  • What a sobering read.

    These are the kinds of things that never get heard in the debates about same sex marriage.

    All we hear is talk about ‘equality’, ‘tolerance’, ‘acceptance’, and ‘what being a progressive democracy ought to mean..’

    Scott McPhee

  • Berlin hosted the world’s first-ever zoophile-rights demonstration on the day its government voted to outlaw it: http://www.equalityforall.net/en/news/worlds-first-zoophile-rights-demonstration-in-berlin-february-1-2013
    Daisy Berliner

  • Isn’t it funny when one considers the opprobrium cast at Cory Bernardi a few months back, yet all he was saying was that practitioners of Besitality can use the same arguments that gay rights campaigners are using. If the above does not confirm Cory’s comments.
    Mick Koster

  • Is this the same Peter Singer who advocates for abortion up until two years old?

    Michele Cook

  • Yes Michele he sure is, and it is called infanticide. He has been a long time supporter of this. See here eg:

    https://billmuehlenberg.com/2011/05/06/peter-singers-twisted-ethics/

    Bill Muehlenberg, CultureWatch

Leave a Reply