Polyamory Everywhere (And We Can Thank the Homosexual Activists For That)

Let me remind you of a few historical realities. Some decades ago when there was a push to equate cohabitation and de facto relationships with heterosexual marriage, the pro-family voices warned that this would just be the start of the slippery slope, and all sorts of other relationships would soon also be recognised and legalised – including homosexual relationships.

Of course the lefty elites and the social radicals poured scorn on that claim, using mockery and insults to try to discredit this argument. They scoffed, saying that we were just scare-mongers, panic merchants, and nutters, and it would never happen. They had a great time attacking and mocking those who made these warnings.

Of course these warnings have now come to pass completely and absolutely, with homosexuality now being the flavour of the month for the past ten or fifteen years, and homosexual marriage seen as normal as apple pie, or vegemite on toast, depending on what country you come from.

So all that vilification and contemptuous mocking was simply a way to divert attention from the truthful claims of the family campaigners. The radicals knew full well that they were right, and thus they had to try to discredit them and demonise them.

And it worked really well. Government recognition of the homosexual lifestyle and homosexual relationships is about as high as you can get on many Western governments’ to-do lists nowadays. The very thing being warned about a few short decades ago is now taking place before our very eyes.

All the warnings have come to pass, and all the talk of slippery slopes have been fully realised. Just as we said. And now pro-family forces are warning about exactly the same thing: once you legalise homosexual marriage, then anything goes.

There is no logical reason whatsoever to deny polyamorists or polygamists their right to marry, once you allow homosexuals to. And for that matter, the case against incest, and even bestiality, begins to quickly dissolve as well. Our side is now making these warnings loud and clear. I have been doing just this for over a decade now.

And what is the response from the other side? Hey, why are we not surprised? It is exactly the same response which we heard decades ago. They are again resorting to mockery and vilification, accusing us of being nuts, and claiming such things will never happen.

Oh yeah? Never happen? Then why have I penned dozens of articles now on these very things happening as we speak. Why do we find over 300,000 results when we simply google the word ‘polyamory’? Why are there academic, professional, legal, and lobby groups all over the West championing group love and marriage?

Of course we are into the slippery slope big time – just as we have warned. And who do we have to thank for all this? Why, the militant homosexual activists of course. Their case for the radical redefinition – and therefore complete destruction – of marriage is the exact same case being used by the polyamorists and others.

I have documented this time and time again on this website. Every single lousy argument being used to make the case for homosexual marriage is being used by the polyamorists as well. And why not? They are in complete agreement on this. They both sing from the same song sheet.

We now know all the standard baloney arguments being proffered:
-love is all that matters;
-keep the state out of the bedroom;
-why are we being denied our rights?;
-as long as adults are consenting, what business is it to anyone else?;
-marriage equality is what we want;
-love is not bigoted;
-why should religion prevent us from our love?;
-it is time to end all unjust discrimination;
-love knows no bounds;
-only bigots will want to block our love;
-marriage should be for everyone;
-we’re here, we’re queer, so get used to it;
-we’re poly, we’re jolly, so get used to it.

On and on it goes: the identical weak arguments; the identical bloated rhetoric; the identical illogic; the identical attempts to redefine marriage out of existence. And it is all over the place now. Let me offer just another example of all this.

Consider this news headline from today: “Identical twins in relationship with same man”. The article says this: “A Perth man who is in a relationship with two identical twin sisters says he would marry both women if it were legal. Marc Glasby, who will appear on SBS current affairs program Insight tonight, was married to his wife Belle for 30 years before falling in love with her sister Dorothy.

“However, despite falling for her twin Mr Glasby still loved Belle and the trio entered into a polyamorous relationship. ‘The relationship has not been without its hiccups, not least of all due to sibling rivalry that exists between sisters,’ Mr Glasby said. Dorothy agreed the start of the relationship had been unusual. ‘When I first came into the relationship there was a lot of guilt of course… looking at what the bible says,’ Dorothy said.

“But her sister Belle said after time the relationship became a source of strength for the trio. ‘Our love keeps the three of us strong,’ she said. Marc said he feels unfortunate to live in a society that doesn’t accept marriage to multiple partners, blaming religion for the taboo. ‘If I had the option I would most certainly be legally married to both girls, as they are both, in every respect except on paper, my wives,’ Mr Glasby said. ‘As far as I’m concerned Dorothy’s my wife as much as Belle.’

“The debate over gay marriage has thrust polygamy into the spotlight as some advocates argue it would be inconsistent to allow marriage between people of the same sex but deny the right to those in polyamorous relationships. Tonight’s Insight discusses the issue of polygamy with advocates including an Aboriginal elder and Lebanese Muslim.”

And if we buy the twisted reasoning of those pushing the homosexual marriage agenda, then how in the world can we deny the logic of this threesome? Their arguments are of course identical. Surely what is true for homosexual marriage is true for group marriage.

Once you destroy the fundamental nature of marriage, then anything goes. And the four fundamental and non-negotiable components of marriage have always been:
-one from each gender;
-only two people;
-of the proper age;
-not a close blood relative.

Meet those basic conditions of marriage, and anyone can marry. But start to mess around with these fundamental components, then we no longer have marriage, but sexual anarchy. And now that the homosexual militants have kicked out the first leg of opposite gender, then the polyamorists are fully justified in kicking out the second leg of two in number.

And of course then the paedophiles can kick out the third leg of proper age, and the incest crowd can kick out the final leg of close family ties. And while we are at it, then the bestiality fans can get rid of a fifth criterion: only between human beings. Hey, why be so intolerant and discriminating? We demand our right to marry Fido.

So thanks homosexual militants. You have done exactly what we said would happen: you have opened the Pandora’s Box, and once it is opened, it is very difficult indeed to shut again. Thanks for destroying marriage, for destroying family, and for destroying society. You ought to be real proud of yourselves.

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/national/8474779/identical-twins-in-relationship-with-same-man

[1245 words]