Seven Things You Must Know about the Safe Schools Program

The taxpayer funded Safe Schools Coalition has certainly been in the spotlight recently – and for good reason. It is an absolute shocker of a program, and the more folks learn about it, the less they like it. Pretending to be an anti-bullying program for our schools, it is nothing of the sort of course. And the more we learn about what is in it and who is behind it, the more it stinks to high heaven.

Here are seven things all concerned parents need to know about this radical social engineering program. Use this information to inform others, including politicians, about what a damaging and destructive program this really is. At the very least, all Federal funding (that is, our tax dollars) must be pulled from this revolutionary activist program.

One. The safe Schools Coalition is not about anti-bullying. If it were, it would talk about the main cases of bullying: those who pick on those who are too tall, too short, too fat, too skinny, too ugly, too pretty, too smart, too dumb, etc. But instead it is all about one thing only: the promotion of homosexuality and related sexualities. The site itself says this:

“Safe Schools Coalition Australia is a national coalition of organisations and schools working together to create safe and inclusive school environments for same sex attracted, intersex and gender diverse students, staff and families.”

Consider what we find on the SSC “Resources” page:

Growing up Queer
An Australian pilot study that explores how homophobia, transphobia and heteronormativity impact on…
OMG I’m Queer
Created by young people, OMG I’m Queer talks sexuality and gender identity.
Guide to Supporting a Student to Affirm or Transition Gender Identity at School
A step by step guide for schools supporting transgender and gender diverse students.
Guide to Hosting Inclusive School Formals
Use this resource to make sure that your school formal, deb, dance or any event is inclusive for…
All Of Us – coming soon
Our ground-breaking educational resource that supports gender diversity, sexual diversity &…

On and on it goes:

Two. The SSC program is about radically transforming our schools, our children, and our society. A major player behind the SSC, Roz Ward (see more on her below) has produced all sorts of material which would shock most parents.

For example, consider the glossy, full-colour 36-page booklet, Stand Out. It is a real eye-opener, and you all should have a careful look at it. Consider just one item, as found on p, 6: The idea that boys and girls should be able to use each other’s toilets is pushed here: “Transphobia can also include specific restrictions on the way that students are allowed to express their gender; things like which uniform you’re allowed to wear or toilets you can use at school.”

Click to access 67bcaee23b6cd8036e402aa33e4e4490.pdf

Moreover, the SSC is constantly linking to all sorts of web pages, sites and resources which would also utterly shock all parents. One site regularly referred to is the Minus18 website. Their page on how to bind your chest is a real eye opener. It goes on to link to other sites such as “The Tool Shed,” an international erotic toy store. Because of public pressure, that link has now been removed from the SSC site. It was found here: 1

Three. Then there is all the helpful (not) information on how students can engage in all sorts of questionable activities, such as how to cross dress:

1. Provide students the option of wearing any part of your school uniform regardless of gender.
2. Categorise uniform options by type rather than by gender, i.e. ‘shirts’, ’trousers’, ‘accessories’, rather than ‘boy’s uniform’ and ‘girl’s uniform’.
3. Enforce uniform standards equally, regardless of gender identity (e.g. hair length, make up, jewellery, short and skirt lengths etc).
4. Explicitly acknowledge transgender and gender diverse students in your school uniform policy or dress code….

Click to access 5800d52c9ac32c5049ebd234478df846.pdf

We also have on the SSC site a page devoted to the children’s book, The Gender Fairy. The page begins with these words: “Only you know whether you are a boy or a girl. No one can tell you.” The book is “for young children aged four years+” and the page goes on to say this about it:

The Gender Fairy begins with a story of gender stereotyping: two babies who are born and bought presents in pink or blue. And the gender fairy (who has a non-binary gender identity) answers questions for two young transgender children. Can I use a male toilet? (Yes, you are a boy). Can I wear girl’s clothes? (Yes, wear the clothes that make you feel comfortable).

Four. We also need to look at some of the chief driving forces behind the SSC. One of the major groups undergirding the SSC is the Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society (ARCSHS). And one of its main figures is La Trobe University sexologist, activist and Marxist, Roz Ward.

She is described as follows on the La Trobe site: “Coordinator, Safe Schools Coalition Victoria, College of Science, Health and Engineering, School of Psychology and Public Health, Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society”.

At a conference on Marxism last year in Melbourne she bragged about how she developed the SSC for the express purpose of implementing Marxism in the classroom. She has repeatedly spoken about how she wants to use the school system to agitate for Marxist economic and social policy. Said Ward:

To smooth the operation of capitalism the ruling class has benefited, and continues to benefit, from oppressing our bodies, our relationships, sexuality and gender identities alongside sexism, homophobia and transphobia. Both serve to break the spirits of ordinary people, to consume our thoughts, to make us accept the status quo and for us to keep living or aspiring to live, or feel like we should live, in small social units and families where we must reproduce and take responsibility for those people in those units.

And again: “Apart from social stigma and discrimination, almost every single structure in society is set up to accommodate only two possible genders, male or female. Everything from the toilets we use, the school uniforms, changing rooms, all official documents, passports, the process is that you go through airports, everything is divided into these two limited gender options.”

See also:

Five. Watch out for the paedophile connection. As we dig deeper into this nefarious program, we find all sorts of very disturbing connections, including the truth that those advocating for paedophilia have been active in the groups behind the SSC. Consider this from today’s newspapers:

Nationals MP George Christensen used parliamentary privilege to accuse Gary Dowsett, the deputy director of the Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society at La Trobe University, where the Safe Schools Coalition project originated, of advocating pedophilia.
He cited an article by Dr Dowsett, published when he was a school teacher in 1982, in which he recounted having “a friend, a pedophile, who is working very hard on making sense out of his relationships with boys”.
“These relations consist of, among other things, a large amount of nurture and support for these boys, a real caring for their welfare and growth,” he wrote in journal Gay Information.
“We have three legal/social questions to win: custody rights for gay men and lesbians; the legal right of pedophiles and their young lovers; and, finally, the sexual rights of children as a whole. Those gains must be won for the kids, too. We need to protect the youthful partners in pedophilia against the legal and social management systems which treat them as delinquents.”
Dr Dowsett wrote that many mothers and fathers found their children “sexual” and activities such as cuddling, bathing and breastfeeding “generate sexual responses in their parents”.
“How different, then, is that gentle, tentative sexuality between parent and child from the love of a pedophile and his/her lover?” he wrote. “From all accounts, and from many academic studies — some worse than others — that kind of love, warmth, support and nurture is an important part of the pedophilic relationship.”

Six. Let the students in the schools and their parents speak for themselves. Consider what the students are saying. One 15-year-old Victorian school girl said this:

Impacts of “Safe Schools”
-Spoken about in almost every subject, especially health subjects. It claims it is an opt-in program but when you are forced to do a health subject where it is integrated into all of them you can’t get out of it.
-Becomes a higher priority than other more important world issues. One day the wall was filled with students’ posters about health issues in other countries and morbidity and mortality rates but then the next day the posters were gone and replaced with LGBTI posters.
-The posters are plastered all over the school. If you walk down the hallway you find posters. Entering the coordinators you find about 15 stuck in various locations. The posters are everywhere you go and it is impossible to not go by one every day. This means the content is taught as the truth to everyone even if they don’t really want to know about it. It is subconsciously being taught to everyone all day without them even noticing.
-It makes students who aren’t LGBTI or who don’t agree with it feel inferior and those who do feel superior to others. …

And parents are also greatly concerned about all this. Here is just one of them:

“I am shocked that my child’s primary school Marrickville West Public School has joined the Safe School Coalition! Our school is full of minority communities. Why should the LGBTI community have an anti-bullying program exclusively aimed at their needs? I am disappointed that I was not informed of this drastic change in my child’s school. I have a right to know what my child is being taught!”

Seven. We have a number of terrific Coalition MPS really running strong with this issue now, calling for the program to be axed, or at least certainly defunded. Mention has already been made of all the terrific work folks like George Christensen have done to alert the public to this toxic program, and to seek to curtail it.

Also, Tasmanian Liberal Senator Eric Abetz just said this: “My mind is made up: the so-called ‘Safe Schools’ programme is a bad programme based on advancing Marxist ideological interests, according to its own architect. It should be core business for every teacher in every school in Australia to stamp out bullying irrespective of its motivation. The programme should be abolished.”

And, “Barnaby Joyce will personally lobby Simon Birmingham to rein in the contentious Safe Schools Coalition anti-bullying program amid backbench outrage over the Education Minister’s ‘whitewash’ review of the scheme and claims one of its key proponents is a ‘pedophile advocate’.”

Sadly, there are hyper-left activists like the opposition leader Bill Shorten and the Victorian Premier who have fully defended this monstrous program. Concerning the latter, he just recently said this: “Anti-bullying program Safe Schools will continue in Victoria even if it loses Federal Government funding, Premier Daniel Andrews has promised. . . . Mr Andrews said if the Federal Government did cut funding for the program, the State Government would make up for the shortfall in Victoria.”


Right now the Federal Government is rightly looking into institutionalised child abuse. By every account, the Safe Schools program amounts to little more than this very thing – the institutional abuse of children in the name of radical minority group activism.

Any program this radical, this dangerous, and this controversial must be carefully examined before being allowed to go any further. Australian taxpayers deserve at least that much. Given the toxic and depraved nature of this program and so many of those radical groups associated with it, it should be immediately suspended, until a full and proper inquiry into it takes place.

[1989 words]

65 Replies to “Seven Things You Must Know about the Safe Schools Program”

  1. I have just sent a message to Senator Eric Abetz on his parliamentary website, thanking him for opposing this evil program. We need to let these front row people like Abetz know that they have our support!

  2. Thanks Bill. I am perplexed that it seems to be only a few LNP MP’s who are speaking out against this.

    What a disgrace on the rest of the parliament.
    Ill send this around my circle.

  3. Thanks for the article Bill. I can’t believe that these people are so brazen about what they are doing, yet no-one seems to be awake to it. Is society asleep at the wheel? Sadly, the ABC keeps advocating for this program by distorting the facts and launching ridiculing (and abusive) ad hominem attacks at anyone who speaks out against it. Can this really be happening? Brave New World. Watch now for the attacks against Senator Abetz 🙁

  4. Hi Bill, just posted this to FB with my own comments, which are………..
    In my post yesterday I pointed out the paedophile element within the gay rights push. There is also this element in the Safe Schools program [refer the link below]. The program’s writer is Roz Ward whose agenda is “cultural marxism.” Cultural marxism is that branch of totalitarian communism which seeks to control the ethos/social activity/beliefs of citizens – as opposed to control of economics, politics, defence, foreign relations etc. CM seeks to eliminate or control the traditional principles that have kept society together over the ages – such as religious beliefs; these must be destroyed because citizens may hold to them before allegiance to the State. One way of diverting people from this ‘opium of the people,’ [Karl Marx], is to encourage them to have carte blanche in sexual behaviours – basically to pander to their lusts which society formerly frowned upon, and those things which society frowns upon are often motivated by religious belief. Once the God-belief is weakened it will not stand against the State. This suppression of religion is common in all communist states. Today, the old tactic of banning or persecuting faith-systems is passe; today’s tactic is to promote gender fluidity, normalize deviant behaviour, decriminalize abortion and pornography and to destroy the nexus between marriage and procreation [gay marriage]. Do we really think that the majority of the West’s heterosexuals suddenly collectively realized that gays are being unjustly treated by being excluded from marriage, and so have voted in favor of it in so many countries – without the influence of an insidious political agenda? [In the U.S. this was taken out of the people’s hands by SCOTUS, which verifies the political agenda straight from the top]. Now watch this trend: moves to lower the age of consent and/or the easing of judicial penalties for paedophilia as well as the proliferation of the sexualization of children [as per the Safe Schools program]. Roz Ward’s program came out of a Dept. at La Trobe headed by Prof Dowsett – a paedophile sympathiser – refer Bill’s link below

  5. Thanks Bill.

    Yes on the “Safe” Schools resources pages all the resourses are about homosexuality, not bullying. I referenced this and the quote it says about it’s purpose in the letter I sent at the request of FamilyVoice Australia today (

  6. The supposed aim of these programme is not to identify and give support to either prides (gays) or transgenders, especially since the number of such pupils in schools is minimal compared to the number of children who are genuinely bullied for a whole raft of reasons, based upon age, race, religion, disability, ability, intelligence, lack of intelligence, economic status, beliefs, or the type of clothes they wear, or just for being different etc.

    The real aim of such programmes is to identify and cull those pupils, teachers, parents and governors who refuse to accept the propaganda. Outlists are being introduced where anyone who is not either an outed gay or ally of gays is regarded as suspicious and a threat.

    An article entitled, ‘Students opposed to LGBT agenda shamed in classroom’, reported,
    The Queer Straight Alliance at Acalanes High School, in Lafayette, lectured students in several ninth-grade English classes on Jan. 29 about LGBT issues, according to Brad Dacus, president of the Pacific Justice Institute, which is representing the parents.
    During the class, the students, ages 14 and 15, were instructed to stand in a circle. Then, they were grilled about their personal beliefs and their parents’ beliefs on homosexuality, PJI alleges.
    “The QSA had students step forward to demonstrate whether they believed that being gay was a choice and whether their parents would be accepting if they came out as gay,” PJI attorney Matthew McReynolds said. “Students who did not step forward were ridiculed and humiliated.”

    If you are not in on the outlist you are definitely out.

    David Skinner UK

  7. The beauty if one can call it that of being a boy who can pass himself off as transexualising into being a girl is that he can trick girls into what they believe is a lesbian relationship, whereas it is in fact heterosexual. On the other hand he can trick a boy into into having a heterosexual relationship with him if he can convince the victim into believing he is a girl.

    But it will appear that any girl or boy who complains of being deceived will be accused of transphobia. Deception and lying are no longer regarded as barriers to trannies getting what they want, when ever they want. There are no borders or boundaries when it comes to LGBT rights. No moral standard can stand in the way of trannies’ absolute freedom to ride rough shod over anyone in their path.

    David Skinner UK

  8. Thank you for alerting of this extraordinarily dangerous program for our vulnerable children, thank God for the liberal and national party’s politicians for taking a strong stand against this dangerous program.

  9. The Sunday Tasmanian ran such a pro-Safe Schools article on March 6, called “All they want is a fair go”, it should have said ‘advertisement’ at the top.

    Amazingly, they printed my letter the next week (March 13) saying so, as well as the below:

    Attempting to promote ‘diversity’, the Safe Schools literature whinges about ‘heteronormativity’. Hello? A natural family, with both sexes parenting their own children, is twice as diverse as a household with only one sex doing the parenting.

    It is a normal and healthy part of growing up for teenagers to have close friends of the same sex. This program wants to corrupt and sexualise your child’s innocent friendships, by luring them into sexual experimentation to convince them they are “born that way” and can never change.

    Homosexual and transgender activists, who choose to be incapable of natural reproduction, have absolutely no right to dictate the education of other people’s children.

  10. It is hugely ironic that Friedrich Engels’ Marxist analysis of the ancient classical-period Greek marriage and family in his The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State uses language that might be rated “homophobic” by his 21st-century sexual revolutionary successors…

    Dialectic Materialism has no actual end in sight as a revolutionary process for social change – revolution must, by its nature, be self-perpetuating, yielding a “constantly evolving” society.

  11. Remember: the only reason this has all come to light is that one brave mother took her child out of school and went to the press. Let that be a lesson to us all:
    (1) You can make a difference.
    (2) As a parent you should inquire thoroughly about what your children are being taught, you must take an active part in the PTA, and you must make a fuss. If individuals keep making a fuss at individual schools the program will ultimately have to be scrapped.

  12. Thanks Bill. This is a much-needed comprehensive look at the UNsafe schools program. I believe the way has been paved for this because of the lax attitude of this nation towards homosexual militancy, the gay Mardi Gras being a case in point. The underlying slack and apathetic willingness to allow the gay agendas even into our churches is breaking this nation down spiritually, and as a result, worse things like this program are now being foisted upon us. We have to repent of our ‘she’ll be right mate’ attitude. She WON’T be right in this nation if we don’t stir up our zeal for the Kingdom and for righteousness in every corner of this nation and seek God and pray…because that’s always been the thing that God has wanted us to do…PRAY and ask Him to move in and intervene in the heart of this nation.

  13. I haven’t seen any of the Catholic Church officials (archbishops, bishops or priests etc) voicing any opinion as to the merits or otherwise of this safe school program. The Catholic Church has a lot of schools and many Catholic kids go to the State schools. Aren’t they interested in what our children are being taught. Perhaps they think it is a good program. One bishop told me that he thought same sex marriage should be legalized for the good of society. In any event, the Catholic Church does not have a good record when it comes to children – watch the movie ‘Spotlight’. But why don’t the Catholic hierarchy give moral leadership anymore? Are they too frightened? Don’t they know that cowardice is a sin?

  14. Phil, I commend you for putting this together, and each person who receives it should offer it around to their email contacts.

  15. Damning Safe Schools video (Roz Ward)

    Please see the attached damming video of Roz Ward (Safe Schools Coalition architect) speaking at the 13 June 2014 Safe Schools Coalition National Symposium (at NAB, 700 Bourke St, Melbourne):

    “…we hear the stories of ‘but we don’t really have any gay students in our school’. Because they’re not necessarily visible, right. So we have got to think about really explicit physical cues that are very clearly about gender and sexual diversity. So we think very specific posters work really well – very specific messages from school leadership. Very specific messages things written in the school newsletter about Safe Schools Coalition is about supporting gender and sexual diversity. Not about celebrating diversity, not about stopping bullying – about gender and sexual diversity, about same sex attractive, it’s about being transgender, about being lesbian, gay, bisexual – say the words, transgender, intersex. Not just ‘be nice to everyone’, ‘everyone is great’”

    Is this not promoting an ideology rather than ensuring bullying (which should not be tolerated) does not occur?

  16. Reply to B T Walters: The Catholic church is in crisis. What it does have going for it is that it is the Body Of Christ, not the Body Of Bishops. Christ is the Head, not the liberal Francis.

  17. Yes thanks John. I don’t know why I keep hoping/expecting that the Catholic bishops will use their not inconsiderable influence and help us with some of these critical issues. The bishops certainly rallied behind the Native Title issue which, in my view, was a fraud on the Commonwealth. They have been silent about ‘gay marriage’ and equally silent about ‘safe schools’. So what do the bishops do? Nothing of any consequence. But they are happy to live high on the generosity of the Catholic faithful. That is why the church is in crisis. If the CEO did this ‘nothing’ he/she would be out on his/her ear. The ’cause of truth’ needs this powerful block of influence and it is about time that the bishops began to earn their money. Their silence on the above two issues at least suggests they are timid but at most it suggests agreement. But whatever it is the end result is still nothing. Nevertheless John, the bishops run the church and the money flows up to them, the Body of Christ notwithstanding. The money might flow up but the curse flows down. God is not mocked! But thanks for your comment John.

  18. Mark Wong, yes the real nasties, the real bullies are the homosexuals. These are the sons of Ernst Rohm the vicious homosexual thug who lead Hitler’s bodyguard, the Brown Shirts or Storm Troopers.

    For the past ten years, Stonewall, the most satanic and malevolent gay rights advocates held their annual award ceremonies on the premises of the Victoria &Albert Museum, London. This involved the presentation of awards to politicians, those in the media and sport etc., whom were regarded as heroes in advancing the cause of the LGBTs.
    Somewhere to the rear of this triumphal parade would have been exhibited, for public display and humiliation, those who do not sign up to homosexual diversity and equality- “the narrow minded homophobic bigots”.
    Those who in one way or another attempted to uphold family values and a concern for children had been either nominated or given the “Bigot of the Year” award and were invited to receive, in person, the award at the V&A, but quite reasonably they never made an appearance and were instead presented in absentia with the award.
    This could well change in future, with their being forced to march in London Gay Pride, in chains, with placards around their necks, saying “I am a filthy homophobic swine.”

    Previous winners of Bigot of the Year Award were Lord Devon, the 18th Earl of Devon, who refused to permit civil partnership celebrations as well as weddings at Powderham Castle, his ancestral sea; Lillian Ladele, the Islington registrar who refused to perform civil partnerships ( sadly deceased) ; Bishop of Motherwell, the Roman Catholic bishop, who stated that the gays had insinuated themselves into the Holocaust week; Iris Robinson MP who said that gay people could be ‘cured’, describing homosexuality as ‘disgusting’, ‘loathsome’ and ‘an abomination’ and who said that ‘There can be no viler act, apart from homosexuality, than sexually abusing innocent children.’
    In 2007 the nominations were: Archbishop of Birmingham who spoke out against treating children needing adoption as goods and services for gays; the Bishop of Hereford, who withdrew a job offer to a youth worker because he was gay; Patricia McKeever, editor of the Catholic Truth website and newsletter, who outed Catholic priests; Ian Paisley Jnr – minister in the new Northern Ireland Executive, who said he was ‘repulsed’ by homosexuality.
    In 2009, the Bishop of Winchester ( also sadly deceased) was nominated as ‘Bigot of the Year’ by a gay charity after he said people should be free to question whether homosexuality is a fixed trait. What the blue blazes is our Queen who in her Coronation Oath swore to defend the Christian faith and the ministers of Church doing to uphold her holy vows?

    After ten years Stonewall ended their Awards evening, in November of last year. Ian McKellen, arguably one of the most evil men in Britain gave a final speech . The video presents a sinister and chilling scene as he stands like a Nazi leader, flanked on either side -not by the Swastika- but by the Stonewall logo, an inverted pentagram which everyone recognises as a Satanic symbol used by the Illumaniti.

    Watch this please and ask yourself why is this man is not banged up as a traitor in the Tower of London, instead of being allowed to continue peddling his homophobia propaganda?

    David Skinner UK

  19. With regard to the Safe Schools Programme, we need to quote the Human Rights Act 1998 on Freedom of Expression, Section 10, part 2.
    This states:
    “the exercise of these freedoms, since it carries with it duties and responsibilities, may be subject to such ….. restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of … public safety…..for the protection of health or morals.”
    The behaviour, attitudes, values, propaganda and ideology that the proud gays practice and espouse, carry huge risks. Homosexuals are as much as danger to themselves as they are to others. Men who have sex with men are far more likely to be promiscuous, indulge in reckless, violent sexual acts, contract life- threatening sexually transmitted diseases and suffer from mental illness, such as bi-polar depression. But the last thing they want is either to be protected from themselves or for parents to protect their children from them. Gays have in built death wish and they want to carry as many of us with them.
    The safe place used to be in the home and the school but the gays have invaded both, smashing down the front door and demanding to terrorise, as a human right, parents and children with their limitless demands. But like the Ouroboros, hopefully they will devour themselves, before they destroy us all.

    David Skinner UK

  20. Ian Mckellen a man driven by a deep hatred of God played the part of Richard in Shakespeare’s Richard 111. And yet one realises that it was not Richard but himself he was playing.

    David Skinner UK

  21. Thanks Bill for this information,I knew that this program is harmful to our children but reading this has confirmed it for me,I have sent a link to one of our local counsellors in Port Stephens and also shared this on Facebook ,it needs to be stopped now!

  22. Thankyou for your imformative article. I am convinced people don’t realize the truth. Q &A last night as an example when a panelist approved the program although she hadn’t read it.

  23. Bill send me a personal mail, I can help you guys.
    This tragic history was tried to implement in Brazil, but Brazilian people which is not better than Australians, PROTEST: we rent Trucks with large sounds, thousand of people went to street screaming NO GENDER IDEOLOGY in school, we did that so many times, praying all the time for Jesus save our country of this, we also send more 11 thousand mails to politics, that they took in trash all this devil teaching. Everyone independent of which religion is, who is a good person, should join us, because even the Medical Pediatricians of America said this is a CRIME to a kid. I’m a quiet and pacific person, but when comes to my kids I became a FIGHTER.

  24. Thanks for the analysis. I’ve linked it to mine:

    I’d encourage everyone to not only read it but act on the petitions I link in it. As said…

    “Such comments come from a mindset that those who disagree are in a minority (a questionable assumption) and will silently consent to handing their children over to such indoctrination either through ignorance, intimidation or apathy. Quite the opposite is required to address this..”

    Don’t let them win by default.

  25. Thanks well done. reveals that a gay woman was upset by what the full on personal development education at her “progressive” school, because it was too “heteronormative” and now Safe Schools is needed to somehow balance it all out.

    Also for your edification one may like to have a look at the “Parents, Tweens and sex app” targeting 10 to 13 year olds, written by a gay psychologist and developed in conjunction with Swinburne TAFE presumably with government funding.

    Won’t be showing my 10 year old that app.

    I wonder where this is all going to end and how far can the various self interest lobbies push their agenda in schools.

  26. I believe that children of the past few decades haven’t had any issues being who they want to be. I feel so ashamed that this anti bullying crap has been excepted by schools… the children that are bullied get bullied for various reasons but it’s not about sexuality anymore. When my daughter was at high school being gay was the in thing, society has made it acceptable already. And kids think it its cool.
    The kids that were picked on were the underprivileged… mildly and majorly autistics. And the extremely smart kids also took a hammering. Children with different sexualities do not need training. Just like all other children they will find there lifestyle themselves. This campaign is disgusting and it should be abolished and made illegal. I’m ashamed of our leaders to of ever allowed this. It proves that our country is not run by strong leaders with moral and integrity. We are run by the corrupt immoral and perverted.

  27. PA Governor and others who do this should experience class action litigation! Anyone can NOW dress up and become a protected class! Legal identification cards are physical identification! And should not be allowed to be altered by a simple document declaring the change of identity by psycho-social standard. Only if physical change has occurred through surgical procedure! They are physical IDs! It is a National and local security threat and its a threat to the well being of every citizen. This also is a public safety issue, with a potential for massive public political control through unfair selective law. There is no law removing gender by birth, or selecting gender at birth by choice. Identification cards cannot and should not be selective to be an alias on public legal identification cards. Legal IDs are an intricate part of public safety! Imagine a world where people who could would exploit and take advantage of innocent people, or to be legal perverts, by a simple form and discrimination laws can selectively plan to become a protected class, or to be able to dwell among us anonymously for any ill intent they desire! Black people are born a protected class. But “transgenders” can choose to be a protected class! In PA anyone can NOW dress up and become a protected class!

  28. Good morning Bill. Thank you for your efforts on informing us of what is really happening and alerting us to action to those that have the courage and boldness to do so. I pray for more to speak up and more eyes to be opened to see and stand against the evil that is seeking to devour our children! Thanks for this article: I especially want to highlight the fifth point to those that have children and grandchildren. Once again thank you for all your efforts to bring the truth without compromise.

  29. Children should not be taught about LGBT before they reach puberty. It can mess them up. A program called Safe Skills should be a bullying policy including all children that are bullied not just a minority. There are more non LGBT kids bullied than LGBT

  30. Hi thank you Bill. As you sent a reply to my daughter via FB I thought I would read your article .
    Having done this I will follow through with the links but also repost this and request my friends read it.
    It is the enlightenment I have been seeking on this matter.
    So thank you so very much Mary

  31. Hi

    Bill et-al, please note even the gays activists agree that safe schools is a problem

    I have a child who is about to enter high school , I have contacted the school and explained that I do not want my child Bullied as a part of or because she may disagree with the safe schools program. They said there anti-bullying program rode above safe schools but i said because you have signed onto safe schools all you need is one person to say something and the teachers etc will have to tow the line an act in a way that discriminates against my childs beliefs. I said that with Religious education -summarily dismissed by the Marxist premier of victoria ( no pre elections statements on this) and replaced with safe schools , people who hated one form of religion ( i.e what limited Christianity or otherwise was actually permitted to be discussed) where able to pull themselves and their kids out of the class. Safe schools is not a class it is a program, a schools wide effort to indoctrinate my kids and for that matter force teacher to celebrate a childs sexualization. I said are the teachers forced to agree with a person converting to islam., or christianity…..needless to say they have asked me to write a letter …this I believe is an effort to get at least some wider views before a Marxist activist tries to force everyone to and minors at the school to be sexualized , i.e actively de-moralize and groom my kids realized- next they will insist the kids actually ‘experience the gay/tranny act’ who knows.

    Anyway The deputy principle who probably thought safe schools was something to do with allowing for a safe school did ask for a letter. I was very calm on the phone so she thought I should make the point in a letter to the principle.

    I need help, can you provide a factual template and argument something that is articulate and such that will inject doubt ( needed) into the school leader minds about the good of safe schools…my argument that anti bullying programs should suffice seemed to work especially when I said safe schools is likely to supplant their efforts against bullying, and allow for focused bullying of some in the school.

    Please can you help I am at a loss s to how to write this…I am not dumb with writing but I need facts and I need to be able to write it as me. I am very happy to return my finished letter for your use, if you want to read it first then that’s fine as well, but I need to do this soon . I know facts but need a list of references, and quotes , i.e bullying, Marxism,teacher rights, minority rights , freedom of religious expression, religion definitions ( I believe marxism is a religion and so is the gay activists belief system- a religion of a type and there fore should not be allowed in state school- it is an way of thought a belief system and an identity is that not a religion.

    Please provide a resource when we can cut and paste true facts and craft good letters to politicians yes but also influences like school principals, I know the problem with that is lots of people may not quote properly but better that then silence.

    If there are Christian lawyers out there please start providing legals information that we cn use we need it but I for one am ignorant, the marxist gay activists are not they are sneaky and I am too busy to fight it even in a small way. If we are informed and more articulate we can at least try and convert some people so that they don’t go to hell ignorant themselves.


  32. Thanks Simon. This article along with 18 others on the safe schools is a good place to start with plenty of facts and data if you need more info:

    And there are entire websites devoted to fighting safe schools, such as:

    And I of course have written hundreds of articles and three books on the broader topic of homosexuality, so there is plenty of material out there for those who want to make use of it. I encourage everyone concerned about the SSC to do just that.

  33. Something that I haven’t seen reported upon yet is the shocking impacts upon the children who have already suffered at the hands of sexual abusers or perhaps they are still experiencing it – in the present.
    There seems to be major inherent problems in the construction of such material because there needs to be a facility first and foremost for CHILDREN who are Victims of Crimes!
    There needs to be clearly stated when it is an offence for such behaviours to be inflicted upon children. But then again even the discussion itself is a first or initial violation of childhood and worse, being a program, so-called Safe Schools is an ongoing trauma and torture for children who are victims.
    Children need to know they are safe. This program is itself a Crime Against Children.
    Could you imagine children being sexually abused going to the police and having different sexual behaviours and preferences described to them?
    If you do nothing then this is what you are allowing.
    Write and share at every opportunity. Children don’t have a Voice in all of this.
    We must be their Voice!

  34. Dear Bill,
    Since there are only 24 hours in the day, I’ve stopped reading. Enough is enough! I just want to thank you, and to let you know that I intend to contact Malcolm Turnbull about this issue ASAP when he returns to Sydney. In his electorate of Wentworth there are many gay couples. Politicians, as you know, cannot ignore the views of those in their electorates; but the Turnbulls are Catholics. I’m a Jewish Catholic who spent some time in the Anglican Church because my husband’s mother was anti-Semitic and anti-Catholic. NOT Mrs Grundy! But I too have largely white hair, like you. But I’m older: 77.

  35. Would there be any possibility to put them all, together in some safe genderless schools, with same genderless teachers, and genderless toilets. so they and their parents live happily ever after?

  36. Pope Francis states teaching gender theory
    “goes against nature” when speaking with journalists during his flight from
    Baku to Rome, October 2, 2016.

    The following is an extract from the Official Vatican Network of Pope Francis’
    conversation with journalists during the return flight from his apostolic trip to
    Georgia and Azerbaijan.

    Joshua McElwee, American journalist: In the same discourse yesterday in
    Georgia, you spoke as in many other countries about gender theory, saying
    that it is the great enemy, a threat against marriage. But I would like to ask,
    what would you say to a person who has suffer for years for his or her
    sexuality, and who feels that there is truly a biological problem, that his or her
    physical appearance does not correspond to what he or she considers to be
    the true sexual identity?

    Pope Francis: Firstly, during my life as a priest and as a bishop I have
    accompanied people with homosexual tendencies or practices. I have
    accompanied them and brought them closer to the Lord. Some cannot, but I
    have accompanied them and never abandoned anyone. This must be done.
    People must be accompanied as Jesus accompanied them. When a person in
    this condition presents him or herself before Jesus, He does not say, “Go
    away, you are homosexual!”. No. What I referred to is the wickedness that
    today results from indoctrination in gender theory. I heard from a French
    father who was speaking with his children at the table … and asked his ten
    year-old son, “What do you want to be when you grow up?”. “A girl!”. .. The
    father realised that the schoolbooks taught gender theory, and this goes
    against nature. It is one thing that a person has this tendency, this option; and
    even those who change sex. It is another thing to teach along this line in
    schools, to change the mentality. This I would call “ideological colonisation”.
    Last year I received a letter from a Spanish man who told me his history as a
    child and as a youth. He was a girl, and suffered greatly, because he felt he
    was a boy but physically he was a girl. … He underwent the operation. … The
    bishop accompanied him greatly. … Then he got married, he changed his
    identity, and he wrote me the letter to say that for him it would be a
    consolation to come with his wife. … And so I received them, and they were
    very happy. … Life is life, and things must be taken as they come. Sin is sin.
    Tendencies or hormonal imbalances cause many problems and this doesn’t
    mean to say, “Oh well, it’s all the same” … no, no it isn’t. But it is necessary to
    welcome each case, to accompany, to discern, and to integrate. This is what
    Jesus would do today. … I wish to be clear. It is a moral question. It is a
    problem. It is a human problem. And it must be resolved as is possible,
    always with God’s mercy, with the truth, as we have said in the case of

  37. Daniel Andrews is quoted as saying “Safe Schools saves lives and helps stop bullying in our schools”
    I have a question.
    Is there any evidence that a) the program stops bullying of any kind and particularly of the kind the program is designed to reduce or b) has resulted in reduced teenage suicide rates of LGBTiQ etc teens?
    This seems a very easy thing to say, but without any tangible evidence is simply another baseless quote from another progressive helping neither the cause of the progressives or their credibility.
    Seriously, is there any evidence either way?

  38. What about an Australian March against safe schools programme. Over 25 years ago they marched in New Zealand which stop the government from legalising gay marriage, unfortunately no one stood up against it this time

  39. Hi Bill. I tried out a number of these links you gave us.
    With a number of them, the website acknowledged the page existed but put up an error message e.g. “Forbidden!” or “Page no longer exists” (The Gender Fairy magically disappeared!)
    I found the “Chest binding” page ok, but I was hoping that I could have some other evidence to show the deniers.
    Can it be that they are hiding something perhaps? Have they woken up to the fact that concerned parents are actually reading the details and understandably freaking out?
    Nonetheless, even the basic resource pages that the Safe Schools Coalition only have some high-sounding rhetoric to politically hose-down concerns.
    And yes there is NOTHING there about other minority groups more likely to be coping with bullying, only those who are experiencing gender dysphoria etc and promoting the trans lifestyle.
    Is there any other links with hard evidence that I can go to?

    Thanks Bill.
    David B

  40. Thanks David. Yes, after a huge public outcry, a lot of the links and graphic content was pulled. Some of the anti-SS websites may still have the original info (taken from pics of the web pages, etc). So it may well yet be available with a bit of digging around, especially on the onside sites.

  41. Kevin, the link you posted of all of us censoredship-4 is not working now any help?

  42. Thanks for the interest Jack. I just checked, it’s working.
    Otherwise, try the Facebook link: – and do share there. There’s also a new post about how this whole thing ultimately is an activist’s dream in manipulating the masses. I do wish it was all a conspiracy but the facts are pretty plain to see…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *