Children as Commodities, Episode 3,597

Another day, another case of child abuse. But this is politically correct child abuse. Thus it is condoned, approved of, favoured and celebrated. As long as it is done according to the laws of PC, then it is quite acceptable. And who gives a rip about the child anyway?

As long as the children are part of radical social experiments, then anything goes. Consider this case of madness in which a toddler is being kicked around like a football by not one, not two, not three, but four adults – and an activist judge. And of course it is all OK because these four are homosexuals – a federally protected species.

This is how the story opens: “They set out together to create a much-wanted child. But when baby E was born, his lesbian parents, and the gay couple who donated their sperm, were unprepared for the ‘flood of emotions’ that hit them.

“Although the four had discussed parental responsibilities and visiting arrangements at a ‘baby summit’ before E’s conception, the Family Court heard that in the struggle for ‘ownership’ of the child after his birth, the women stopped the men from seeing him. Justice Linda Dessau had to determine what was in two-year-old E’s best interests.”

The madness simply intensifies: “Stressing that the case was not about the socio-politics of single-sex parents or the definition of a nuclear family, she ruled that the boy should spend time with all four adults. ‘E is the product of a number of fine people,’ she said in a recent judgment. ‘He is entitled to know about them, to know them, and to know their love of him’.”

So much insanity in so few words! What did we just read here? We read of a ‘flood of emotions’. Yep, going on feelings is what this is usually about. Never mind what is right, or what is rational. Just do what feels good. That is the only arbiter nowadays of right and wrong.

Then we have talk of ‘ownership’ of this hapless toddler. The child is a mere commodity in this ugly world of adult selfishness gone mad. A slab of meat being tossed around by incredibly selfish and juvenile adults who are only concerned about their wants, not the well-being of the child.

And of course the learned judge thinks that family definition has nothing to do with anything. Never mind the thousands of studies that prove conclusively that family structure does very much matter for the well-being of the child.

Never mind that a biological mother and father cemented by marriage is the strongest indicator of child stability, well-being and health. Never mind that the research now is basically closed on this most vital of matters. But since when does a PC judiciary really care very much about evidence and facts?

But the real winner is this bizarre remark by the esteemed judge: ‘E is the product of a number of fine people.’ There you go. Today we do not have children who come from a loving mother and father. Instead, we have ‘products’ which are the result of any number of players.

Indeed, we now have committees and teams who are hatching these products. I can’t see how things can get much more depersonalised, demeaning, and inhumane. This is all brave new world lingo, straight out of the worst scenarios found in science fiction novels.

Forget families altogether. Let’s just generate these products in the factories. Indeed, we seem to care far more about battery hens and their egg-laying woes than we do about human beings and the infants they conceive. This is simply another indication that humanity is on the path of no return.

That this judge can so cavalierly and glibly treat this toddler as just some product purchased at K-Mart is reprehensible. But the same goes for these four infantile adults who are far more hung up on their own desires than the good – or otherwise – of this poor child.

The destruction of marriage and family is well under way in Western cultures. And the biggest losers of all are the children who are mere pawns in the cruel games played by PC adults who would rather create their dysfunctional new world than put the interests of children first.

When innocent children become the victims of radical social agendas, then we know without doubt that civilised society is nearing its end.

www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/lifematters/struggle-over-ownership-of-baby-split-gay-parents-20100908-151cr.html

[730 words]

11 Replies to “Children as Commodities, Episode 3,597”

  1. Correct again BIll.

    Naturally we can expect a flood of such insanity now that NSW has legalized homosexual adotion – clearly to multiply a myriad of such godless and horrific cases.

    And given the painfully clear record of history – at Eden, Sodom and Gomorrah, confining the fallen angels to utter darkness mentioned in Jude – how can we pretend that Australia can long avert terrible judgement for such unspeakable self-serving wickedness???

    And that despite the overwhelming eveidence of sickness, disease and addiction associated with the homosexual lifestyle – including drunkenness and violence amongst lesbians!! Obvioulsy when Romans 1 mentions that homosexuals can be very violent, it does not just mean against others – but also against each other!!

    Romans 1:29-31 (KJV)
    Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, [30] Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, [31] Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:

    Romans 1:29-31 (Message Bible)
    And then all hell broke loose: rampant evil, grabbing and grasping, vicious backstabbing. They made life hell on earth with their envy, wanton killing, bickering, and cheating. Look at them: mean-spirited, venomous, [30] fork-tongued God-bashers. Bullies, swaggerers, insufferable windbags! They keep inventing new ways of wrecking lives. They ditch their parents when they get in the way. [31] Stupid, slimy, cruel, cold-blooded.

    Bless you always,

    Stuart Reece

  2. King Solomon made a judgment on two women who both claimed a baby was theirs saying cut the living baby in half. The true mother said “no give the baby to the other woman so the baby will live” whereas the false mother said “yes cut the baby in half”, demonstrating that blood is thicker than water. What will these four people mean to baby E when he grows up? His father living with another man (if they stay faithful) and his mother living with another woman (ditto). His true biological parents have abdicated their unselfish function of being parents to him so they can selfishly play parents with their same sex partner, indulging their own desires. Ultimately he can only look down on them in sadness and disappointment because everyone craves to know who and where they came from. These four are definitely not “fine people” and the judge was remiss in making such a presumption. The case has everything to do with single sex parents and the definition of a nuclear family and that judge has meted out great emotional harm to an innocent child, the consequences of which will eventually be played out. It looks like this little boy will bear the brunt of the actions of these buffoons.
    Rachel Smith

  3. It was noted in our local paper that one MP voted for same-sex adoption as he ‘felt it was right’. Horrors, we don’t do what we feel is right, we stand for what is right.
    Families and sociiety always do best when individuals follow God’s created intent for humanity.
    Judith Bond

  4. When you read of cases like this it is amazing that men and women who are known as politicians, can legislate to allow this sort of thing happen. All I can assume is that they have taken leave of their senses or it might be that they are not their own masters as satan has got them well and truly sucked in to approving the worst that society can do to people.
    Roger Marks

  5. Stay with the fight. Don’t lose heart. Thank you Bill for bringing this type of article to our attention. It serves to make me more determined to speak out on God’s intentions for His creation.
    Dawn McGregor

  6. It seems that post modernism reigns supreme, even if the scientific evidence says otherwise. Funny how the world takes what it wants. Perhaps the judge should watch ABC Catalyst programme on the ongoing research they are running on the importance of the father to both boys and girls in their development. Watching the string of the research over time the evidence becomes overwhelming but our pollies seems to woefully misinformed or only caring about the next sound bite. Bill keep up the good fight on this one.
    Charles Northcote

  7. In former times the man in street was able to argue and communicate with someone else, confident that the other person accepted the same presuppositions about logic, cause and effect and what appeared to be self evident truths about reality, truth and morality etc. Common sense was indeed common and communication was democratic.

    But if such a man had attempted to enter into a debate with 19th and 20th century philosophers, like Hegel, Kant and Foucault, he, like most of us, would have been at a total loss. He also would have said that such debates had no practical relevance; that they were merely time-wasting, intellectual games, divorced from reality. How wrong he would have been. Their philosophies govern our lives and in attempting to argue with our families and neighbours we are forced into the most abstruse, intellectual gymnastics, for which few of us are equipped to handle.

    Our opponents having appropriated truth, language, history, the Bible, the media, education and the most intimate areas of our lives. – our children – are in the process of deconstructing them before finally destroying them altogether. We all, young and old, exist only as good and services, as commodities and consumers.

    Google Peter Tatchell and Thailand: Gayness, Bar Boys and Sex Tourism (there is no direct link) and compare his views with those Richard Poulin
    http://in-defense-of-the-innocent.blogspot.com/2006/12/globalization-and-sex-trade.html
    http://www.abolitionist-online.com/07r_poulin.shtml
    http://www.redpepper.org.uk/article723.html

    David Skinner, UK

  8. I don’t need to remind People that Peter Tatchell is the celebrated and feted human rights champion – but not of the the unborn baby, children, sex slaves, or slaves of any category – only of sodomites who regard children either as commodities or consumers.

    David Skinner, UK

  9. Perhaps we could call our children free-range or grain fed just like the chickens and the eggs sold in our supermarkets! What will happen to these beautiful babies when these multiple relationships dysfunction, not one of them will want to change a dirty nappy or feed a crying baby @2am especially when they have no idea who the real mother is! Lets put ourselves first, we are adults, we can choose our sexuality, we can have lots of fun and at the end of the day we can validate our relationship with our lover. So lets just have a baby and then we can prove to everyone that everything is OK!
    Jane Byrne

  10. Kinda reminds me of the story of the baby and King Solomon, only without anyone having either the godly wisdom and judgment of Solomon or true sacrificial motherly love for the baby.

    The only safe healthy families are those who are under the reign of God’s law, and best, if under the reign of Christ by the Holy Spirit.

    This poor child has none of the above.

    Pray.

    Sibyl Smith

  11. Sorry, Rachael, I didn’t see your comment. Guess that’s two of us who thought of Solomon.
    Sibyl Smith

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: