The homosexual activists never sleep, never eat, never rest – or so it seems. They are hell-bent on implementing their radical agenda, no matter who gets hurt along the way. And if children suffer as a result of their selfish crusades, so what? They don’t seem to give a rip.
Several more incidents – of many – can be mentioned here. They all demonstrate how obsessed these activists are in pushing their radical lifestyle choices on the rest of society. And the mainstream media is up to its ears in complicity with all this.
Consider a report in today’s news about a poor six-year-old boy who is being raised by lesbians. That is bad enough: children have a fundamental right to be raised by a mother and a father, and when that is not possible, the next closest thing to it should be the alternative.
The lesbian couple were not only given this foster boy, but they thought it would be a neat thing to perform their sick gender-bending experiments on him. Here is how the press covers this outrageous story: “A six-year-old boy placed in the care of a lesbian foster couple was dressed in girl’s clothes and the humiliating pictures were posted on the couple’s Facebook page.
“One of the women was preparing for a sex change to become a man at the time, while her girlfriend was undergoing fertility treatment. The boy and his 12-year-old sister have since been moved but former Children’s Court magistrate Barbara Holborow yesterday called for a full inquiry into the decision to put them there. ‘Oh my God, what are we doing?’ Ms Holborow, who has fostered eight children, said. Families Minister Pru Goward has demanded a full explanation from child welfare service Barnardos, which had recruited the couple.”
At least some belated sanity occurred in this despicable case, but the damage has already been done. This is what we have come to expect from these morally-impaired activists. Just treat children as trophies and guinea pigs in adult social experimentation. Celebrate your depravity and drag innocent children into the ugly mix.
But the activists have been emboldened by an almost totally subservient MSM which is just as intent on pushing these reprehensible agendas. Indeed, some MSM outlets have become so bad, and so predictable, that you know not a day will pass without them seeking to push the homosexual agenda.
Indeed, they will use any pathetic little excuse to further promote this cause. Melbourne’s Age (or more accurately, Gayge), is a classic case in point. They will never let an opportunity go by to push the activists’ agenda, no matter how un-newsworthy or out to lunch the story might be.
I nearly choked on my morning coffee when I read this incredible headline in the Age a few days ago: “World champ axeman backs gay marriage”. What? This is a news item? You got to be joking! How low will these guys go? Why don’t they just make these things up? Indeed, I eagerly anticipate the Age coming out with these vitally important headlines soon:
-“Leading tuba player backs gay marriage”.
-“Renowned stamp collector backs gay marriage”.
-“Local Coles checkout chick backs gay marriage”.
-“Retired factory worker backs gay marriage”.
-“Former taxi driver backs gay marriage”.
-“Part-time dental receptionist backs gay marriage”.
-“Man who likes oatmeal for breakfast backs gay marriage”.
-“Teen brushing his teeth backs gay marriage”.
-“Receptionist on her coffee break backs gay marriage”.
-“Bored housewife backs gay marriage”.
-“A group of ringtail possums back gay marriage.”
Such headlines make just as much sense as the one the Age did run with. It is not only a non-event and utterly un-newsworthy, but it was just another lousy excuse for the Age to push its pet agenda. The newspaper has long ago decided that reporting the news in a balanced and objective fashion was not good enough.
It has decided instead that creating the news, and pushing minority group agenda items is now the only game in town. The truth is, this activist newspaper ought to be given the flick. It has simply become a laughing stock, as it replaces news gathering with propaganda and indoctrination.
Of course equally despicable is “our” ABC. I have reported countless examples of their gross bias and bigotry. It seems to be as anti-Christian as it is pro-homosexuality. I recently wrote about one of their religious programs which was amongst the most unbalanced and lopsided events I have seen on the ABC: https://billmuehlenberg.com/2011/07/11/the-abc-should-be-put-out-of-its-misery/
Given that I have to cough up my hard-earned tax dollars to keep the ABC alive, it is especially reprehensible when it deliberately pushes falsehoods, inaccuracies and deception in the public arena. Someone who complained about this bigoted broadcast received a letter back from the ABC, and passed it on to me.
It is just as biased and full of baloney as the original Compass show was. The letter is one long example of Orwellian doublespeak. The folks at the ABC seem to have been bending the truth for so long that it has become an art form.
Consider this rubbish for example: “We appreciate this is a polarising issue, but in reality it’s a far from ‘black and white’ argument – hence the need such diversity, and nuanced arguments. Even though it wasn’t a debate, we in fact secured 3 for and 3 against at the table – although they were not predictable in their arguments.”
Of course it is black and white: either marriage is only between a man and a woman, or it is opened up to any and every combination. And as I documented in my original article, this was not at all three against three. What we had was six against one, and the ABC knew this full well.
One blatant falsehood after another can be found in the ABC reply, but the worst may be this one: “We approached a number of other high profile Christians who were against same sex marriage but they declined to take part (including Jim Wallace and Bill Muehlenberg).”
I do not know about Jim, but at no time did I ever receive a letter, a phone call, a fax, an email, or a SMS from the ABC. It is that simple. So what is it that starts with an “l”, ends with an “e” and has an “i” in the middle? That is the only thing which can be said about this absolutely outrageous claim.
But why are we not surprised that the ABC resorts to this sort of behaviour? It is simply par for the course, and what we have come to expect from these guys. So if you ever wonder why it seems so difficult to get any fairness or balance out of the ABC, this is part of the reason. Playing fast and loose with the truth seems to be their speciality.
No wonder we are being continuously swamped with the homosexual agenda, when this small minority group is being aided and abetted by the MSM. That is why a thriving alternative media has been set up, to counter the mistruths, distortions and out and out bias of the MSM.
But don’t expect the outrages to let up anytime soon. They will continue to pour in, and get worse as well. Now is not the time to give up on this battle. Now more than ever is the time to get involved, especially for the sake of our children.
22 Replies to “More Outrages From the Rainbow Warriors”
Hi Bill, once again a brilliant article.
It is about time people wake up to the idiocies of the Homosexual agenda and I was glad to be able to send you that email regarding my complaint.
Bob Brewer
Hi Bill,
Have you considered suing the ABC for defamation? They are, after all, falsely accusing you of backing down in the face of an opportunity to debate. If you have a copy of this letter, it sounds like a God-given opportunity to publicly expose their lies, bias and dirty tricks.
If you haven’t already, could I also suggest you pass a copy of the letter on to Jim Wallace.
Mansel Rogerson
The axeman article is only 3 days old but they’ve closed it to comments. Can’t have the truth getting in the way of a good(?) story.
John Bennett
Thanks guys
Thanks for the tip Bob and yes Mansel I may need to take this further. Such deliberate falsehoods should not go unchallenged. The ABC has been getting away with murder for far too long.
But of course the problem is this – I am just one little guy without any money, but they would have countless millions (of our tax dollars) at their disposal to challenge any legal case. The lefties there go on and on about monopolistic big corporations, but of course the ABC is a monopolistic big corporation, and it can ride roughshod over ordinary Australians any time it likes. So unless anyone one has some legal friends out there willing to do this for free…
Bill Muehlenberg, CultureWatch
Thanks for the laughs Bill with the newspaper headlines.
Imagine being a MSM paper or national television broadcaster and getting away with such rot.
If only the consequences of their actions weren’t so devastating – and we could just ‘laugh them off ‘as the joke that they are.
Annette Williams
Hi Bill,
Yes, you would certainly need legal support to go down this route. But this is why I suggest speaking to Jim Wallace. If he has been defamed as well (and by implication the organisation he represents), then the resources and connections of the ACL could be used.
Mansel Rogerson
In answer your question, ‘what starts with L ends in E and has an I in the middle?’: Lible sic. (If you don’t know how to spell.)
Marcus Anderson
Hi Bill,
Thanks for all you do in bringing the truth to light.
My parents, as well as other relatives have been involved in foster care for long term placements over the years, so they have seen the descent of both government policy, and sadly the standards of organisations such as Barnados.
This event is not a surprise to those who have been involved in some capacity in foster care in NSW. Not only the politically correct government policy but the ‘Left-ucation’ of social workers coming out of our universities have rushed us towards this moment.
In information from a former department associated worker, the homosexual community has been active behind the scenes in what is now DOCS since at least the 1980s – there are handicapped and mentally disabled people (within the context of group homes and sheltered workshops) who have been abused and taken advantage of by homosexuals in positions of authority in this particular department. But as you probably know and has recently been recently highlighted (in either Vic or SA) it is almost impossible to achieve justice in areas where the testimony depends on that of mentally handicapped victims. And of course it was swept under the carpet.
Also, it is interesting to see that this story has not been picked up by SMH….
Nikki Chamberlain
I wonder if Bolt would be interested in the ABC telling porkies.
And now I wonder if porkies is Owellian in origin.
Kylie Anderson
Kylie, ‘porkies’ is earlier than Orwellian in this context. Orwell was exposing something very serious, which the world hasn’t really understood.
I quote from You Can Trust the Communists (to be Communists) by Fred Schwarz, PP paperback edition 1972 (c) 1966-69 Chantico Publishing Co p86 (context: the successful method used by Lenin & the Communists to seize power in Russia.)
“Lenin was a dynamic Marxist, a believer in the dialectic which, as we will see, allowed him complete freedom of action and policy. If his goal of power could be achieved by doing the exact opposite of what he had long advocated, then that is what he should do. The basic doctrine of Marxism-Leninism is: Come to power. The Marxist-Leninist will promise whatever is necessary in order to achieve that end. Lenin, therefore, promised peace and land. But the gift of land was merely the bait that covered the barbed hook of Communist dictatorship.”
Whilst this has more direct relevance to another political context, it shows that those who seek to control others (ie. totalitarians) will always have malleable morals because they put the attaining or holding of power above all else.
That’s why it is often hard for us as Christians to understand our opponents: consistency is not essential to them and contradictory statements at different times are simply not a problem for them. Their logic is purely that of “Whatever It Takes” (to retain power).
The public never hears the phrase in parentheses which, in the case of our inept PM, is the Achilles heel of the Federal government because of how quickly she contradicted herself in public.
I don’t know if they will be able to help you over there in Australia or if they only work in the US, but the ADF was created for cases just like yours.
Raymond Cox
Hi Bill
I am surprised at the ABC’s need to claim they asked you. When I complained about the way they used the Bible in a science program they simply said it was their format for that program.
Should you let them know that it must have been another Bill Muehlenberg they asked? Tell them you are always ready to help if they really want your opinion.
Katherine Fishley
Am continuing to pray daily for you and all those you carry in your heart Bill. Yours is an overwhelmingly demanding vocation and the rest of us must be unfailing in prayer support. May God richly bless you for your faithfulness and may he bless and protect your family, shielding them from all harm and the deceptions of the enemy.
Anna Cook
Many thanks Anna
Bill Muehlenberg, CultureWatch
Dearest Bill, I will offer up all my daily sufferings to the Lord for your family and your book, full of genius!! I promise! God bless you beautiful Bill! Close your eyes and rest and let the Lord take care of your enemies!! Praise God!
Jane Byrne
John I’m not sure if I misunderstood you or you misunderstood me. When I mentioned porkies I meant that Orwell’s pigs told porkies not that Orwell was telling porkies. My ignorance of all things Orwell has been revealed to me by certain people who comment here and so I am attempting to read “Animal Farm”. As yet I haven’t got past the forward. I feel that there is a great gap in my education when discussing things with people such as yourself.
Kylie Anderson
“They are hell-bent…..” How true!
The only effective way to make these criminals take notice is to hit them where it hurts most: by cancelling your subscription to the “Gayge”. Just imagine the effect it would have on their circulation if the 60 per cent of Christians in Victoria, as determined by the Census, followed suit.
You are always at liberty to lodge a protest against the (G)A(y) BC by boycotting its programs; and campaigning to have it privatised. The Commonwealth Bank and Qantas, among others, have already been forced into that position. There is absolutely no valid reason, in this day and age, for the government to prop up the ABC; or SBS for that matter.
Dunstan Hartley
Kylie, I did understand you as it turned out from your second post. It is definitely the pigs telling porkies which my quote exposes.
Indeed, Animal Farm is not an easy read, because it is written at two levels. There is a “more obvious” level portraying the general way in which revolutionary leaders eventually betray the ideals they began with. This displays the effect of sin and selfishness in human nature.
But there is also an allegorical level which portrays the specifics of revolutionary Russia where the farm represents old Russia, and the various animals represent key figures such as the Czar, Lenin, Stalin, Trotsky, the farmers, the workers and so on.
I confess to a lack of perseverance to follow the fine detail of the allegory, and if you wish to trace it all out, you may need a companion volume to help.
Nineteen Eighty Four is regarded as his final word on the bankruptcy of socialism/communism. It is not an easy read either, as it exhibits much of Orwell’s bitter disappointment with his political & moral choices. But it should be essential reading for anyone wanting to understand how totalitarian regimes operate.
As a young man in the Far East, Orwell (Eric Arthur Blair) had observed the tyranny of his British so-called Christian countrymen over the natives, and soon turned his back on the faith.
But that meant he had no anchor for his life, which is one aspect that Bill brings out here on his blog – the fact that turning our backs on God is empty, futile and ruinous.
Hope this helps, and I trust that you persevere.
John Angelico
I made the mistake of allowing Chris Ullman (ABC) to interview me on camera at the rally against the carbon tax here in Canberra recently. He then took the footage and portrayed me as a no-account idiot with it. I will be a bit more wise next time.
Ian Brearley
Thanks Ian
Yes that has happened to me plenty of times. It is one thing to do a live interview: that way they can’t edit you and your words. But if they tape you, they can go back to their studios and engage in all sorts of villainy. They can be a rather despicable lot at times.
Bill Muehlenberg, CultureWatch
I think Channel 10 probably needs to be called into account.This Wednesday evening, several programs were pushing the homosexual agenda (overtly). It was ridiculous how many there were (not just 1 or 2). You get fed up with the constant barrage of rubbish they keep trying to “ram down our throats”. TV is no longer about information or entertainment, it is simply delivering a message or pushing agendas.
Steven Harrison
Yes quite right Steven.
Bill Muehlenberg, CultureWatch
Hi Bill, once again a brilliant article.
It is about time people wake up to the idiocies of the Homosexual agenda and I was glad to be able to send you that email regarding my complaint.
Bob Brewer
Hi Bill,
Have you considered suing the ABC for defamation? They are, after all, falsely accusing you of backing down in the face of an opportunity to debate. If you have a copy of this letter, it sounds like a God-given opportunity to publicly expose their lies, bias and dirty tricks.
If you haven’t already, could I also suggest you pass a copy of the letter on to Jim Wallace.
Mansel Rogerson
The axeman article is only 3 days old but they’ve closed it to comments. Can’t have the truth getting in the way of a good(?) story.
John Bennett
Thanks guys
Thanks for the tip Bob and yes Mansel I may need to take this further. Such deliberate falsehoods should not go unchallenged. The ABC has been getting away with murder for far too long.
But of course the problem is this – I am just one little guy without any money, but they would have countless millions (of our tax dollars) at their disposal to challenge any legal case. The lefties there go on and on about monopolistic big corporations, but of course the ABC is a monopolistic big corporation, and it can ride roughshod over ordinary Australians any time it likes. So unless anyone one has some legal friends out there willing to do this for free…
Bill Muehlenberg, CultureWatch
Thanks for the laughs Bill with the newspaper headlines.
Imagine being a MSM paper or national television broadcaster and getting away with such rot.
If only the consequences of their actions weren’t so devastating – and we could just ‘laugh them off ‘as the joke that they are.
Annette Williams
Hi Bill,
Yes, you would certainly need legal support to go down this route. But this is why I suggest speaking to Jim Wallace. If he has been defamed as well (and by implication the organisation he represents), then the resources and connections of the ACL could be used.
Mansel Rogerson
In answer your question, ‘what starts with L ends in E and has an I in the middle?’: Lible sic. (If you don’t know how to spell.)
Marcus Anderson
Hi Bill,
Thanks for all you do in bringing the truth to light.
My parents, as well as other relatives have been involved in foster care for long term placements over the years, so they have seen the descent of both government policy, and sadly the standards of organisations such as Barnados.
This event is not a surprise to those who have been involved in some capacity in foster care in NSW. Not only the politically correct government policy but the ‘Left-ucation’ of social workers coming out of our universities have rushed us towards this moment.
In information from a former department associated worker, the homosexual community has been active behind the scenes in what is now DOCS since at least the 1980s – there are handicapped and mentally disabled people (within the context of group homes and sheltered workshops) who have been abused and taken advantage of by homosexuals in positions of authority in this particular department. But as you probably know and has recently been recently highlighted (in either Vic or SA) it is almost impossible to achieve justice in areas where the testimony depends on that of mentally handicapped victims. And of course it was swept under the carpet.
Also, it is interesting to see that this story has not been picked up by SMH….
Nikki Chamberlain
I wonder if Bolt would be interested in the ABC telling porkies.
And now I wonder if porkies is Owellian in origin.
Kylie Anderson
Kylie, ‘porkies’ is earlier than Orwellian in this context. Orwell was exposing something very serious, which the world hasn’t really understood.
I quote from You Can Trust the Communists (to be Communists) by Fred Schwarz, PP paperback edition 1972 (c) 1966-69 Chantico Publishing Co p86 (context: the successful method used by Lenin & the Communists to seize power in Russia.)
Whilst this has more direct relevance to another political context, it shows that those who seek to control others (ie. totalitarians) will always have malleable morals because they put the attaining or holding of power above all else.
That’s why it is often hard for us as Christians to understand our opponents: consistency is not essential to them and contradictory statements at different times are simply not a problem for them. Their logic is purely that of “Whatever It Takes” (to retain power).
The public never hears the phrase in parentheses which, in the case of our inept PM, is the Achilles heel of the Federal government because of how quickly she contradicted herself in public.
John Angelico
Hi,
Have you considered contacting the ADF,
http://www.alliancedefensefund.org/
I don’t know if they will be able to help you over there in Australia or if they only work in the US, but the ADF was created for cases just like yours.
Raymond Cox
Hi Bill
I am surprised at the ABC’s need to claim they asked you. When I complained about the way they used the Bible in a science program they simply said it was their format for that program.
Should you let them know that it must have been another Bill Muehlenberg they asked? Tell them you are always ready to help if they really want your opinion.
Katherine Fishley
Am continuing to pray daily for you and all those you carry in your heart Bill. Yours is an overwhelmingly demanding vocation and the rest of us must be unfailing in prayer support. May God richly bless you for your faithfulness and may he bless and protect your family, shielding them from all harm and the deceptions of the enemy.
Anna Cook
Many thanks Anna
Bill Muehlenberg, CultureWatch
Dearest Bill, I will offer up all my daily sufferings to the Lord for your family and your book, full of genius!! I promise! God bless you beautiful Bill! Close your eyes and rest and let the Lord take care of your enemies!! Praise God!
Jane Byrne
John I’m not sure if I misunderstood you or you misunderstood me. When I mentioned porkies I meant that Orwell’s pigs told porkies not that Orwell was telling porkies. My ignorance of all things Orwell has been revealed to me by certain people who comment here and so I am attempting to read “Animal Farm”. As yet I haven’t got past the forward. I feel that there is a great gap in my education when discussing things with people such as yourself.
Kylie Anderson
“They are hell-bent…..” How true!
The only effective way to make these criminals take notice is to hit them where it hurts most: by cancelling your subscription to the “Gayge”. Just imagine the effect it would have on their circulation if the 60 per cent of Christians in Victoria, as determined by the Census, followed suit.
You are always at liberty to lodge a protest against the (G)A(y) BC by boycotting its programs; and campaigning to have it privatised. The Commonwealth Bank and Qantas, among others, have already been forced into that position. There is absolutely no valid reason, in this day and age, for the government to prop up the ABC; or SBS for that matter.
Dunstan Hartley
Kylie, I did understand you as it turned out from your second post. It is definitely the pigs telling porkies which my quote exposes.
Indeed, Animal Farm is not an easy read, because it is written at two levels. There is a “more obvious” level portraying the general way in which revolutionary leaders eventually betray the ideals they began with. This displays the effect of sin and selfishness in human nature.
But there is also an allegorical level which portrays the specifics of revolutionary Russia where the farm represents old Russia, and the various animals represent key figures such as the Czar, Lenin, Stalin, Trotsky, the farmers, the workers and so on.
I confess to a lack of perseverance to follow the fine detail of the allegory, and if you wish to trace it all out, you may need a companion volume to help.
Nineteen Eighty Four is regarded as his final word on the bankruptcy of socialism/communism. It is not an easy read either, as it exhibits much of Orwell’s bitter disappointment with his political & moral choices. But it should be essential reading for anyone wanting to understand how totalitarian regimes operate.
As a young man in the Far East, Orwell (Eric Arthur Blair) had observed the tyranny of his British so-called Christian countrymen over the natives, and soon turned his back on the faith.
But that meant he had no anchor for his life, which is one aspect that Bill brings out here on his blog – the fact that turning our backs on God is empty, futile and ruinous.
Hope this helps, and I trust that you persevere.
John Angelico
I made the mistake of allowing Chris Ullman (ABC) to interview me on camera at the rally against the carbon tax here in Canberra recently. He then took the footage and portrayed me as a no-account idiot with it. I will be a bit more wise next time.
Ian Brearley
Thanks Ian
Yes that has happened to me plenty of times. It is one thing to do a live interview: that way they can’t edit you and your words. But if they tape you, they can go back to their studios and engage in all sorts of villainy. They can be a rather despicable lot at times.
Bill Muehlenberg, CultureWatch
I think Channel 10 probably needs to be called into account.This Wednesday evening, several programs were pushing the homosexual agenda (overtly). It was ridiculous how many there were (not just 1 or 2). You get fed up with the constant barrage of rubbish they keep trying to “ram down our throats”. TV is no longer about information or entertainment, it is simply delivering a message or pushing agendas.
Steven Harrison
Yes quite right Steven.
Bill Muehlenberg, CultureWatch