Yes They ARE Targeting Our Children

Homosexuals, by their very nature, cannot procreate. So if they wish to expand their numbers, they can only do it by recruitment. And many of the more honest homosexual activists have told us that is exactly what they are doing. When the other side tells us all about their strategy and goals, we really ought to pay heed.

Indeed, this is one thing that really puzzles me: when the other side clearly tells us what their plans are and how they hope to achieve their aims, why don’t we start to pay attention? Why don’t we believe them? The militant homosexual lobby has told us in no uncertain terms just how they expect to overturn society, so we really ought to take seriously what they have told us.

I have documented heaps of this in my 2011 book Strained Relations. There I quoted plenty of the activists and what they have said about their goals and strategies, and how targeting children is a crucial part of this. Let me quote from parts of that book here.

Many homosexuals speak of being introduced to the homosexual lifestyle by someone older, while they were still in their teens. Consider this representative quote: “Nobody is fooled when we proclaim that the gay movement has nothing to do with kids and their sexuality. . . . Many of us – both women and men – had our first homosexual experience with partners who were older than ourselves”. Indeed, one study found that 75 per cent of homosexual men report their first homosexual experience before the age of sixteen. This compares to 22 per cent of heterosexual men reporting their first heterosexual experience.

A well known saying states that the hand that rocks the cradle rules the world. Homosexual activists know this all too well. As one lesbian put it, “Whoever captures the kids owns the future”. Thus the constant attempts by homosexual activists to influence children.

There have been many attempts lately to get access to young people. For example, in the United States the New Jersey Supreme Court has ordered the Boy Scouts to admit homosexuals. The Girl Scouts have also caved into Political Correctness. Indeed, according to some Scout staffers, one in three of the Girl Scouts’ paid professional staff is lesbian. And in the United Kingdom, the English Scout Association recently lifted the ban on homosexuals becoming troop leaders….

One quite well known homosexual blog site openly admits to just how intent the activists are in targeting young children in our schools. He says in an article entitled, “Can We Please Just Start Admitting That We Do Actually Want To Indoctrinate Kids?”: “‘NOOO! We’re not gonna make kids learn about homosexuality, we swear! It’s not like we’re trying to recruit your children or anything.’ But let’s face it – that’s a lie. We want educators to teach future generations of children to accept queer sexuality. In fact, our very future depends on it.”

He continues, (and pardon his crude language): “I for one certainly want tons of school children to learn that it’s OK to be gay, that people of the same sex should be allowed to legally marry each other, and that anyone can kiss a person of the same sex without feeling like a freak. And I would very much like for many of these young boys to grow up and start f**king men. I want lots of young ladies to develop into young women who voraciously munch box. I want this just as badly as many parents want their own kids to grow up and rub urinary tracts together to trade proteins and forcefully excrete a baby. I and a lot of other people want to indoctrinate, recruit, teach, and expose children to queer sexuality AND THERE’S NOTHING WRONG WITH THAT.”

Everything that I said there was of course fully documented in my volume. In fact, there are over 700 footnotes in my book, so everything contained therein is fully referenced. And many of my quotes come straight out of the homosexual literature.

And of course things are just the same here in Australia. Let me quote a bit more from my book:

In Australia a number of homosexual activities have made many conclude that children are indeed being targeted by older homosexuals. Several years ago a large outcry arose over the discovery of homosexual swap cards. The cards, which featured sexually explicit photos, pictures and cartoons, were part of a safe-sex campaign.

Also, in a recent edition of a Melbourne homosexual newspaper, there was a large article entitled “Comics come out”. The article described how mainstream as well as underground comic book makers are increasingly using homosexual characters and themes in their comics. Homosexual superheroes have been featured, along with graphic homosexual scenes and dialogue. Indeed, one comic, The Authority, features two main characters who are homosexual superheroes.

Another article in the homosexual press on the same issue reported that there are “probably around a hundred gay characters out there” in comics right now. Given that children are usually the main readers of comics, one has to ask if recruitment is not part of the strategy.

And we also have homosexual cartoon characters in both TV series and in the movies. Consider Utena, Revolutionary Girl, an anime character who is a lesbian. Anime, or Japanese animation, is of course hugely popular with children – (Pokemon being but one example). Advertisements for Utena the movie feature in homosexual newspapers.

Along the same lines, what is one to make of the world’s first talking homosexual dolls? The dolls, which have been sold in the US and Europe, were made available in shops for Christmas 2003 in Australia. Openly homosexual Elton the Biker (complete with nipple rings), and his plastic counterpart Marshall, evidently have sold well overseas. Given that dolls are usually the kind of thing that children, not adults, play with, one has to ask if this is another recruiting attempt.

In the US pro-homosexual books such as Heather Has Two Mommies are found in many schools and libraries. And in Australia, similar books can be found, for example in Sydney school libraries. Another example is Daddy’s Roommate. One book entitled My House has this as part of its story line: “I’ve got a cat and two dogs. I’ve got two mums.”

I could go on, but let me stop at this point, and focus a bit more on the idea of children’s books. I just mentioned a few above, but today of course there are scores of them out there. Our kindergartens and schools are now flooded with such books.

Who says our children are not being targeted? Last month one American researcher, Brad Harrub, posted the following. It makes for scary reading, but we must be aware of what is going on here:

School is back in session…
And the battle for your child’s heart and soul is raging. Many parents are celebrating their children being “out of the house,” not even realizing how busy Satan has been. There are now 32 books promoting LGBTQ lifestyles for your children. These books are in their school libraries. They are being read openly in class. And yet, you are just thankful they are “out of the house.” Many parents can’t even name one of these books, much less name all 32. God help us and have mercy on us. We are sending our children off to pagan lands where they are being taught that abominations in your sight are just alternative lifestyles. (And we wonder why our children leave the church and don’t possess a Biblical worldview…)

The picture I include above shows just some of these books. Um, when will we wake up here? These books are all about getting access to our children. And when the activists have so very plainly said that is their clear intention – to snare our kids for their own agenda – then we really better stand up and take notice.

We are in the middle of a protracted and nasty war. The real endgame is to capture our children, and thus capture our culture. The militants know how utterly essential it is for them to target our children, and win them over for their cause.

So when will we wake up to this assault on our kids and start resisting the activist agenda? Or will we do nothing until it is too late?

[1397 words]

23 Replies to “Yes They ARE Targeting Our Children”

  1. After the initial shock & anger from finding out about “safe schools”, it wasn’t hard to guess that the whole aim behind this program is to increase their numbers.
    I looked up stats & info on kids turning gay, or wanting sex changes, etc, and yes, sure enough, it has been happening, theres been a sharp rise in their numbers since “safe schools” began.
    This is why, in Australia, the gay population, in the last 20 years, has gone from just a half forgotten minority, to boasting they have the numbers to win plebiscites.
    Mind you, they’re not so eager to claim it now, and besides, it was only just another false claim anyway, designed to make people want to follow the crowd & jump on their band wagon.
    As this article describes, gay marriage & safe schools feed off each other. They need each other if they are to continue to exist & thrive.
    If legalised, they can then combine & expand. Their numbers can then grow & grow, making it harder & harder to put a stop to this insidious social virus, which is the precise aim of the gay lobby planners.
    Their ultimate aim, apart from other agendas they have, is to make it impossible to kick them out of power, once they have achieved it. This will give them a free hand to make more & more radical changes without fear of any serious opposition.

  2. The recent kerfuffle over in the US where a school librarian refused to accept the Dr Seuss books the First Lady sent suggests children being exposed to unsuitable content isn’t the only threat to the next generation. Not content with refusing the books, the school librarian in question suggested a number of alternative titles – all highly political, and all very SJW. If that is the sort of content stocked by a school library, and promoted in class, or available to borrow from public libraries, It may be increasingly difficult for children to access suitable content.

  3. Of course none of this surprises me that they do want more kids to become homosexual or transgender.Its all apart of the Kalergi plan. Just look at countries like Sweden and the U.K where they heavy promote books like above and because of this, its not a shocker that most aren’t having kids and Muslims will be the majority in the world and in Europe if this sort of brainwashing continues.Unfortunately most people sadly either don’t get it or label us conspiracy theorists.

  4. So much for being ‘born gay’.

    Anyway, at the end of the rainbow is a big chest full of taxpayers money that is being used by gays to get treated for diseases and other ills. Gays per head of population would be the biggest users of ‘free healthcare’ in Australia. It’s clear that gays are very irresponsible with their personal health.

    In other words – a gay lifestyle is a bludgers lifestyle and Aussies hate bludgers – it’s a no vote!

    God Bless Bill.

  5. Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World depicts a version of society after the success of a sexual revolution of sorts. Children are conceived and genetically manipulated to suit the State’s projected workforce demographic requirements. Sex is pharmacologically modulated and reduced to a purely recreational pursuit – even being divorced from the building of any lasting, intimate, connected friendships. When the populace become restive, they are sprayed with soma, a mood modulating “recreational” drug, to make them happy with the government once more.

    Tragically, the most altruistic character in the story is driven to suicide.

  6. We used to have property rights and you could run a business on your own property without having to promote immorality. We used to have parental rights where loco parentis meant that parents allowed schools to take temporary authority over their children for the purpose of education but it was a given that the parents retained overarching authority. We used to have rights to free speech and people would say things like “I may not agree with what you say but I will fight to the death for your right to say it.” We used to have rights to freedom of religion but increasingly this is being replaced with a so called right to worship i.e. only behind closed doors but not in public. Children used to have the right to their biological parents and even in recent history there was the ‘stolen generation’ where people recognized this right. We used to have the right to protect our children from the seamy side of life but now TV stations and school access to the internet and billboards etc. means this is being usurped. We used to have democratic rights where we were allowed to argue against the use of government funds for immoral purposes. In each of these cases it is sexual immorality that is being promoted and pushed onto us and our children and in the majority of them it is homosexuality that is the catalyst for the loss of rights. How many rights do we have to lose before people will start to wake up? Were these not some of the things that people fought and died for so that later generations might have them? How is it that this generation is so willingly ignorant and so keen to give up these rights?

  7. Hi Bill.

    I was thinking Bill. In these days were queers are infiltrating more business’s than ever I’m quite surprised that you have managed to find a Printing Company brave enough to publish your excellent books. Never mind finding a publishing house where their isn’t a queer/trans in their graphics/editing dept! The stress and strain upon those Christians who own their owner printing companies must be alarming!

    I mention this because my trade was a Graphic Designer and past experience proves that gays are especially in great influence within the arty side of publishing!

    Wonderful article as usual Bill.

  8. Thanks to Gail Foster for the link to Mr Croome’s latest polemic against those freedoms of religion he deems to be the aspirations of a “religious privilege movement”.

    Browsing through the monograph in question, it becomes apparent that Mr Croome’s approaches to the value of the biblical record as a historical source are more akin to those of sceptical Higher Criticism and Liberal theology than they are to Evangelical and Reformed Puritan traditions of scholarship.

    We live in times when scholarly rehabilitations of the reputations of historical figures are increasingly common: Cato Senior’s perennial foes, the Carthaginians are now hailed in certain quarters as pioneers in the field of sustainable population maintenance. Jezebel is seen by some as an ancient example of a self-empowered woman who, for a while, actually broke through that glass ceiling imposed on women by traditional Middle Eastern patriarchy. Certain learned persons have also recently sought to elucidate the redeeming features of Emperor Nero’s colourful career.

  9. Dear Bill,
    Thank you so much for this article. Keep them coming! Just to let you know that we have the council elections coming up and we received ballot papers in the post so I decided to put the candidates to the test and ask them how they would be voting in the SSM plebiscite. I was careful not to give away my own position. They were both naturally hesitant as they were taken by surprise as they probably thought they would not be asked about the SSM issue.

    The female candidate refused to answer the straightforward question I put to her saying it was too personal a question so I said that was alright but I would not be voting for her as it was important to me to put someone into public office who had traditional moral values including the courage of their convictions. I reasoned that if she intended to vote no she was not very committed anyway or she wouldn’t have minded who knew how she voted. I certainly wouldn’t! Her reluctance to answer led me to believe she was probably voting yes which would rule her out in my book anyway. I was left with the impression that she was just a weak, silly woman who did not have the courage to stand up for what she believed in whatever it was.

    The male candidate admitted it was a tricky question but said he would be voting no as he thought it would open a can of worms. I did not mince my words and I thanked him for being honest and said I would be voting for him as I objected strongly to putting someone in public office who agreed with legally legitimising filthy behaviour through marriage because that was all it really was and he agreed.

    To conclude, I think it is possible to find out a lot about people by how they vote on this plebiscite.I have come to the conclusion that the yes voters even if they are not sodomites themselves are weak and confused human beings with absolutely no sense or fear of the Divine and His Creation or even what is right and wrong in the natural law. It is so sad that so many in the Christian world have descended to this level of ignorance.

  10. Go back and read the story of Sodom and Gomorrah. All the violence and perverse intent of the homosexual community is there. What is different today?? While not every gay person is violent as an individual, the homosexual spirit, which is now rising, IS. It’s NEVER been just live and let live. They want society transformed in their OWN image. Thankfully, God has another plan, and if He has to use judgement to stop this perversion, HE will!

  11. To avoid beaten up by a “tolerance” placard of the wild-eyed “Yes” to Same-Sex-Marriage activists — here are a few ideas on how we can encapsulate the argument purely to LEGAL GROUNDS to DISMANTLE THEIR CLAIMS:

    EVIDENCE: How SSM activists’ CLAIMS
    1. are deliberately DISHONEST and deliberately “emotive” and
    2. how each of their “claims” COLLAPSE in the face of the EXISTING LAWS and of LOGIC:

    According to EXISTING LAWS (Federal Marriage Act 1961) and CURRENT LAWS on SAME SEX RELATIONSHIPS – “there is NO remaining substantive legal discrimination against gay and lesbian Australians with regards to finance, property rights, or work related entitlements and benefits or sharing those with their partners or rights on relationship breakup.”
    In fact EXISTING LAWS do ALREADY PROVIDE the SAME legal rights and recognition to SAME SEX COUPLES as to DE FACTO heterosexual couples – to legal recognition of their relationships and to the SAME legal systems for resolution of property and maintenance disputes, to Power of Attorney. Same-sex couples even can adopt (even though this is an obvious unacceptable a most serious INJUSTICE against CHILDREN and DENIES to children the BASIC HUMAN RIGHT to a MOTHER and a FATHER – the “Gold-Standard” where it is proven that children thrive best of all).

    • Therefore – according to EXISTING LAWS – the CLAIM by SSM activists – that it is a question of EQUALITY; OR about FAIRNESS; OR about “inclusiveness” – is demonstrably UNTRUE.
    • Therefore as the SSM activists have NO BASIS on which to complain about ANY of their claims, their argument COLLAPSES!
    • Also, as the State has NO reason to be interested in anyone’s romantic inclinations or motivations to marry OR not to marry OR to form a legal partnership (under another label other than “Marriage”), their CLAIM that they are being denied the “right to LOVE” anyone ” is ALSO demonstrably UNTRUE.
    • Therefore as the SSM activists AGAIN have NO BASIS on which to complain – and AGAIN their argument COLLAPSES!

    So actually the “yes” activists simply do NOT have even one legal leg to stand on. It FAILS the LOGIC test as well. Even some LGBTI people warn us that anyone too lazy to do a little simple research, is being conned.
    As it can be demonstrated that ALL the claims / arguments that the SSM activists are using are deliberately “emotive” and completely FALSE… WHAT is the REAL agenda of the SSM activists?

    • WHY exactly are SSM activists actually DEMANDING the APPROPRIATION of the LABEL of “MARRIAGE”?
    • And (interestingly) WHAT is the connection between this push for the LABEL of “Marriage” and the “Safe-Schools” programme?

    — See “Transgenderism: A Leftist Weapon Against the Family” and
    — See and
    — See Bolt Report on FALSIFIED DATA to attempt to justify their stance AND exposing the most BIZZARE EXTRAPOLATION to Australia … or anywhere:
    Question: how many high-school children (supposedly same-sex-suicidal) would EVEN STOP for a moment to CONSIDER MARRIAGE AT ALL at that age???

  12. I’m hearing reports from some pastors and Christian school principals saying that everything will be okay even if the ‘Yes’ vote succeeds because parents will be able to avoid any Safe Schools type indoctrination by changing their children across to independent Christian schools. Can you point me to material to point out whether that’s true or not? It’s seems to be like an “Ark” mentality that God has provided a safe place from the ravages of Safe Schools in the form of independent Christian schools????

  13. Thanks Bernie. Those guys are living in dreamland. One simply has to look overseas. No one is exempt in the end, and independent Christian schools will be targeted just as much as any others. Time for them to wakey wakey, pull their heads out of the sand, and face up to reality for a change.

  14. Hi Bill,
    Thankyou for all your work. It’s a real eye opener.
    Since listening to you on vision and reading your blog I have become much more aware of how our culture has been unfultrated, or rather saturated with all this sexualisation.
    Being a mother of a 6month old girl and 2 yr old boy I am horrified and my desire to protect them from all this is so strong. I get quite upset and overwhelmed. It seems like all this stuff is everywhere and if ssm gets in and safe schools spreads its only going to get worse. How do you cope/reconcile all this? At the end of the day, esp atm with all the ssm stuff, I keep thinking of all the implications and just get overwhelmed. I have tried to do what I can to help the no vote, donating several times for coalition for marriage, doing flyer drops, posting on my Facebook, commenting on Facebook conversations even if I feel bullied (speak the truth in love). But at then end of the day I have all this horrible stuff in my mind from what I’ve heard about ssm and safe school content and other countries.
    Do you have any words of encouragement or advice on how to best deal with it so I can have some peace.
    Also am I going to have to home school my kids? Do you have any recommendations for resources for raising kids in this crazy world? Thanks ?

  15. Many thanks Jenna. Yes it is getting so bad that homeschooling may be the best option to protect our children. I will ask some of my friends who do to post some resources here.

  16. Hi Jenna P.

    Thank you for your stand against the ravages of sinful man.

    There is a distinct possibility that home educating our children will be the strongest defence against this flood. It is truly a work of the enemy.

    Parents will need a strong conviction that this is the way they should go in raising the children in godliness. It is not an easy calling but most rewarding.

    Depending on where you live, regulations governing home education will vary.

    In Australia, I recommend that you talk to Light Educational Ministries in Canberra (, who have top class Christian resources, mainly textbook style. For reading and spelling, they have a proper phonics program.

    Our own family business Kingsley Educational Pty Ltd (KEPL at is very much in the background now but if you are in Victoria then we can probably help with some early learning resources.

    If you want to explore further and just find out a bit more first, then please give Bill M here some contact details. He can then pass them on to me and we can get in touch with you.
    John Angelico
    Narre Warren South

  17. I had to respond to this, without attack, even though you wrote this long ago. To say all homosexuals are after indoctrinating children is terrible. That is a lie. It’s ok to live by the word of god, but underlying all this is your hatred of what is really none of your concern. I can’t help but shudder to think what you would like to do to those who do not conform to your wishes. Thankfully and hopefully Australia will never treat people like you wish to. God bless.

  18. Thanks Luke, but sadly either you are incapable of reading or of telling the truth. Either one does not look very good I am afraid. I of course nowhere said that every single homosexual on the planet is involved in this. What I did say repeatedly (as anyone who can read will see) is that some certainly are. I said things like:

    “many of the more honest homosexual activists”
    “The militant homosexual lobby”
    “I quoted plenty of the activists”
    Etc., etc., etc.

    But I realise that those who prefer to simply emote and offer kneejerk reactions usually do not bother to read things carefully – they just lash out. Or they simply tell porkies about what they did bother to read. And of course they simply deny all the evidence that is presented, and do not offer one scrap of counter-evidence. So typical. So sad.

    Oh, and to present facts, evidence and data is NOT hate. It is simply how normal people go about establishing the truth of a matter. But I realise that folks like you do not like facts, so you throw around ad hominems and go on the attack.

    And of course it is my concern, I have children, My friends have children. Every parent on the planet should be very concerned when their children are being targeted by activists – in this case by militant homosexual activists. If they are not concerned, there is something wrong with them. God bless.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *