“Safe Schools” and the Sexual Agenda Big Picture

The controversies over the so-called Safe Schools programs in Australia are simply a reflection of a much bigger war. For many decades now activists have sought to target our children especially through the school system. Various sex education programs and the like have been used to push radical sexual agendas.

All this did not just happen. It has been promoted and pushed by sexual ideologies and ideologues who have been active since early last century. The sexual revolutionaries have been quite busy, and they helped pave the way for things like the contemporary Safe Schools programs.

Many notable individuals could be mentioned here, such as:
-Alfred Kinsey (1894 – 1956), the radical sexologist, zoologist, and “father of sexology”.
-Margaret Sanger (1879 – 1966), the eugenicist, population controller, sexual liberationist, and founder of Planned Parenthood.
-Alan Guttmacher (1898 – 1974), the obstetrician/gynaecologist who served as president of Planned Parenthood and vice-president of the American Eugenics Society.
-Hugh Hefner (1926 – 2017), the disciple of Kinsey and founder of Playboy.

I have written about many of these social and sexual revolutionaries, eg:

One could go back further than these individuals to get other influential ideological forebears. People like Marx, Nietzsche, Freud, Jung, Reich, and de Beauvoir could also be mentioned. All these folks had a disdain for traditional sexual values, for Christianity, and for the natural family.

Each in his or her own way argued for the total “liberation” of sexuality, the eradication of marriage and family, and the sexualisation of children. They had a contempt for Western society and its values, and many of them knew that a powerful way to overturn a culture was to seek to overturn all sexual values, inhibitions and boundaries.

Many of these sexual radicals sought to destroy the West by means of destroying religion, the family, and all sexual norms. They were sexual anarchists who, in the name of anything goes, wanted to destroy society and remake it into their own sordid image.

Thus everything does go: free sex, homosexuality, swinging, polygamy, group sex, even bestiality and paedophilia if that is your thing. Of course all this was picked up on and played out on a mass scale during the 60’s counter culture. “Make love, not war” was taken to its logical extreme.

And we are now still paying the price for all this. Indeed, the impact of these radicals has of course been enormous. All sorts of advocacy organisations and activist groups have developed to evangelistically promote their ideas and beliefs.

For example, the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States (SIECUS), was founded in 1964 by Dr. Mary S. Calderone. She had been the Medical Director for the Planned Parenthood Federation. This advocacy group has been at the forefront of pushing radical sexuality programs and agenda items, including contraception and abortion, especially in our schools and to our children.

Then there is Marie Stopes International, founded in 1976 to do much the same. And Planned Parenthood International has been going strong for nearly a century now (originally called the American Birth Control league), also pushing all forms of sexual radicalism and abortion on demand.

And plenty of more recent characters could also be mentioned here. One very important one is American feminist, queer theorist, and academic Judith Butler (b. 1956). She has been a leading pioneer in gender theory and really one of the main movers and shakers in the modern transgender movement.

Her 1990 volume Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity is a crucial book in the development of all of this ideology of gender fluidity and the like. She argues that there is no such thing as men or women, and sex is a social construct. There is no masculine or feminine, and one’s sexual identity is fluid and flexible. Sound familiar?

Let me also mention two leading centres of radical sexuality (of many): IASSCS and ARCSHS. The first one says this about itself:

The International Association for the Study of Sexuality, Culture and Society (IASSCS) is a non-profit civil association concerned with the social and cultural study of sexuality. IASSCS was founded in 1997 in Amsterdam, with the commitment to build equity in research capacity worldwide and to develop a broad range of multidisciplinary research activities in the social and cultural study of sexuality.

The second is a more familiar one, located here in Melbourne at La Trobe university. This is how it describes itself:

The Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society (ARCSHS) was established as the Centre for the Study of Sexually Transmissible Diseases in February 1993 as an independent research unit within the Faculty of Health Sciences, La Trobe University. ARCSHS has a multi-disciplinary team of staff with qualifications and expertise in psychology, anthropology, sociology, public health, health promotion, methodology, epidemiology, education, women’s health, consumer advocacy and health policy.

Now I can begin to tie the Safe Schools movement back into the discussion. In October 2010 ARCSHS launched an Australian “Safe Schools” program, and it has taken off from there. The infamous Roz Ward was a key developer and promoter of the SS program.

It is supposed to be just an anti-bullying program, but it is so much more. Indeed, Ward has clearly told us that it is ‘not about stopping bullying…but about supporting gender and sexual diversity’. You can find this being said here:

Ward also proudly admitted that it is really all about pushing Marxism in the schools. As Ward stated, ‘I not only teach people how to be gay, I teach them how to be gay and communist, so invite me to your school if you will.’ This quote comes from a 2013 Marxism Conference that Ward had spoken at and is found here: https://twitter.com/Marx_Conference/status/317775712499159041

But I have spoken about Ward and the SS program at length in 42 other articles, so see here for much more detail: https://billmuehlenberg.com/category/education/safe-schools/

In my next article I will say more about other key players at ARCSHS, and look at a possible paedophile connection. In the meantime, we all have a job to do to challenge this sexual behemoth which is running roughshod over everything. As Gabriele Kuby puts it in her very important book, The Global Sexual Revolution:

It would seem there is no stopping the global sexual revolution. The political power and huge financial resources of the UN, the EU, the governments of the United States and other countries, and the billions controlled by foundations, global corporations, and NGOs, have been thrown behind the effort to deconstruct the binary gender order, deregulate sexual norms, dissolve the family, and reduce the world’s population.

But there is resistance, and there is successful resistance. Around the world, Christian churches, NGOs, individuals and institutions are working for a culture that respects the dignity of the human person and fights for life, marriage and family.

My review of her 2015 book can be found here: https://billmuehlenberg.com/2016/09/15/review-global-sexual-revolution-gabriele-kuby/

Unquestionably, the sexual activists are on a mission. They have been extremely successful in promoting their radical agendas throughout the West. Targeting children has been a major component of this. That is why the militants in Australia are so determined to make sure the Safe Schools programs are everywhere promoted, with all children exposed to it.

These radical sex ed and “bullying” programs are toxic stuff, doing incredible damage to our young people. I know many concerned parents who have had to pull their kids out of schools where this stuff is being forced down everyone’s throats. They are extremely dangerous indeed.

For the sake of our children and our grandchildren, we all need to be part of the resistance movement.

[1277 words]

16 Replies to ““Safe Schools” and the Sexual Agenda Big Picture”

  1. My daughter is 2 years old… I am already trying to strategize how to ensure that my child will be adequately educated without being sexualized.
    Private schools can be expensive and not always a guarantee, and homeschooling might not be an option.
    I hope that we do not have resort to sending our kids to Russia for education in the future.
    If only Roz Ward would have been able to swap places with my parents and live in a communist country, my parents would call that a good swap!

  2. Thank you Bill for laying out in an orderly fashion the history of the homosexualisation of Western Industrial nations. Let us not forget that Britain has been a world leader in using homosexuality to sodomise marriage and dismantle the family. The Gay Liberation Manifesto of 1971, with a preface written by queer, Marxists, Elizabeth Wilson and Peter Tatchell, stated its intentions quite clearly:

    “The oppression of gay people starts in the most basic unit of society, the family…Formal religious education is still part of everyone’s schooling, and our whole legal structure is supposedly based on Christianity, whose archaic and irrational teachings support the family and marriage as the only permitted condition for sex…Yet although this struggle will be hard, and our victories not easily won, we are not in fact being idealistic to aim at abolishing the family…. In some ways we are already more advanced than straight people. We are already outside the family….We question however as an ideal, the finding and settling down eternally with one ‘right’ partner…. we believe that the suffocating small family unit is by no means the best atmosphere for bringing up children………
    The GLF Manifesto articulates a radical agenda … it outlines an alternative vision of how society and personal relationships could be, including living communally, gender subversive radical drag and non-possessive multi-partner open relationships.”

    On February 8th 2018, Fiona Bruce MP spoke in a UK Parliamentary Committee about the urgent need to create a Ministry for Strengthening Families. She stated,

    “Research from the Social Trends Institute into families with children under 12 shows that Britain has the highest level of family instability in the entire developed world. Family breakdown has reached epidemic proportions. If it were categorised in health or environmental terms, it would be a national emergency. David Attenborough might well make a visually dramatic BBC documentary about it. News bulletins and front pages would demand urgent action. Urgent questions would follow, and the Cabinet Office would be engaged with Cobra meetings to co-ordinate a response. But the Government are challenged even to provide a co-ordinated response to this debate.”

    Recently in Britain, we have yet again been shocked at the level of nihilism, violence and murder taking place amongst the young [1] This has been an upward trend, ever since Tony Blair became Prime Minster and put his foot hard down on destroying marriage, the family, and Biblical authority [2]

    The homosexual is the weapon of choice for creating lawlessness in our schools. He embodies the elimination of absolute truth, the removal of the categories of male and female and the destruction of moral absolutes. He has been in the vanguard of smashing down the doors of all restraint and any barrier, such as marriage, the family and Church that will resist his demand for absolute freedom, to get what he wants, when he wants and however he wants.
    ” Follow me.” He cries ” I am leading you to Utopia, Nirvana and Never never land.”

    The homosexual is the fifth columnist in our schools for creating subversion and lawlessness [3].

    Wake up Australia. Smash or be smashed for you are living in la la land if you think the homosexuals will leave you peace and tolerate your living a normal natural and heterosexual life.

    Another homosexual fascist is Michael Swift who wrote his Manifesto in 1987: He claims that the was joking but I think not.

    Yet, the Gay Manifesto has gone according to script. This is no satire and we need take this unstoppable gay juggernaut seriously, before it destroys the gays and us along with them:

    ‘We shall sodomize your sons, emblems of your feeble masculinity, of your shallow dreams and vulgar lies. We shall seduce them in your schools, in your dormitories, in your gymnasiums, in your locker rooms, in your sports arenas, in your seminaries, in your youth groups, in your movie theater bathrooms, in your army bunkhouses, in your truck stops, in your all male clubs, in your houses of Congress, wherever men are with men together. Your sons shall become our minions and do our bidding. They will be recast in our image. They will come to crave and adore us.

    Women, you cry for freedom. You say you are no longer satisfied with men; they make you unhappy. We, connoisseurs of the masculine face, the masculine physique, shall take your men from you then. We will amuse them; we will instruct them; we will embrace them when they weep. Women, you say you wish to live with each other instead of with men. Then go and be with each other. We shall give your men pleasures they have never known because we are foremost men too, and only one man knows how to truly please another man; only one man can understand the depth and feeling, the mind and body of another man.

    All laws banning homosexual activity will be revoked. Instead, legislation shall be passed which engenders love between men. All homosexuals must stand together as brothers; we must be united artistically, philosophically, socially, politically and financially. We will triumph only when we present a common face to the vicious heterosexual enemy.

    If you dare to cry faggot, fairy, queer, at us, we will stab you in your
    cowardly hearts and defile your dead, puny bodies.

    We shall write poems of the love between men; we shall stage plays in which man openly caresses man; we shall make films about the love between heroic men which will replace the cheap, superficial, sentimental, insipid, juvenile, heterosexual infatuations presently dominating your cinema screens. We shall sculpt statues of beautiful young men, of bold athletes which will be placed in your parks, your squares, your plazas. The museums of the world will be filled only with paintings of graceful, naked lads.

    Our writers and artists will make love between men fashionable and de rigueur, and we will succeed because we are adept at setting styles. We will eliminate heterosexual liaisons through usage of the devices of wit and ridicule, devices which we are skilled in employing.

    We will unmask the powerful homosexuals who masquerade as heterosexuals. You will be shocked and frightened when you find that your presidents and their sons, your industrialists, your senators, your mayors, your generals, your athletes, your film stars, your television personalities, your civic leaders, your priests are not the safe, familiar, bourgeois, heterosexual figures you assumed them to be. We are everywhere; we have infiltrated your ranks. Be careful when you speak of homosexuals because we are always among you; we may be sitting across the desk from you; we may be sleeping in the same bed with you.

    There will be no compromises. We are not middle-class weaklings. Highly
    intelligent, we are the natural aristocrats of the human race, and steely-minded aristocrats never settle for less. Those who oppose us will be exiled. We shall raise vast private armies, as Mishima did, to defeat you. We shall conquer the world because warriors inspired by and banded together by homosexual love and honor are invincible as were the ancient Greek soldiers.

    The family unit-spawning ground of lies, betrayals, mediocrity, hypocrisy and violence–will be abolished. The family unit, which only dampens imagination and curbs free will, must be eliminated. Perfect boys will be conceived and grown in the genetic laboratory. They will be bonded together in communal setting, under the control and instruction of homosexual savants.

    All churches who condemn us will be closed. Our only gods are handsome young men. We adhere to a cult of beauty, moral and esthetic. All that is ugly and vulgar and banal will be annihilated. Since we are alienated from middle-class heterosexual conventions, we are free to live our lives according to the dictates of the pure imagination. For us too much is not enough.

    The exquisite society to emerge will be governed by an elite comprised of gay poets. One of the major requirements for a position of power in the new society of homoeroticism will be indulgence in the Greek passion. Any man contaminated with heterosexual lust will be automatically barred from a position of influence. All males who insist on remaining stupidly heterosexual will be tried in homosexual courts of justice and will become invisible men.

    We shall rewrite history, history filled and debased with your heterosexual lies and distortions. We shall portray the homosexuality of the great leaders and thinkers who have shaped the world. We will demonstrate that homosexuality and intelligence and imagination are inextricably linked, and that homosexuality is a requirement for true nobility, true beauty in a man.

    We shall be victorious because we are fueled with the ferocious bitterness of the oppressed who have been forced to play seemingly bit parts in your dumb, heterosexual shows throughout the ages. We too are capable of firing guns and manning the barricades of the ultimate revolution.
    Tremble, hetero swine, when we appear before you without our masks’ [4]

    [1] https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/04/07/london-stabbings-300-extra-police-deployed-streets-tackle-spike/
    [2] http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7777963.stm
    [3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EkZMCS2FdzA
    [4] http://www.defendthefamily.com/pfrc/archives.php?id=6866798

    David Skinner UK

  3. My parents were divorced. My father died a few months later. It was not necessary. My stepfather has treated everyone badly including mother. She gave up a good husband for a bad one. It was foolish.

  4. Beg pardon Bill, I don’t mean to presume on your generosity . I have made this a tad shorter.
    It was bisexual serial adulterer, Roy Jenkins, UK Home Secretary, who in 1967 introduced the decriminalisation of homosexuality and abortion, the repeal of the death sentence ( apart that is for the nine million souls who have been dismembered, and burnt alive in their mothers wombs, since the repeal ), the relaxation of laws on censorship and pornography and last but not least the introduction of no fault divorce. All this was to create a more tolerant and civilised society [1]
    So when gay lobbyists claim that same sex marriage will strengthen marriage which is in a critical state, because of the way heterosexuals have mismanaged it, we have to ask who was it who removed the steering wheel, brakes, suspension, engine , doors and spark plug of marriage in the first place? It has consistently been the gay legislation, driven by rabid feminists, like Germaine Greer [2]. We need to go back sixty years and restore laws that protected marriage and family. But being normal and natural, as with telling the truth will be a revolutionary act .
    [1] https://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/personal-view/3586178/Roy-Jenkins-made-Britain-a-far-less-civilised-country.html
    [2] http://www.dailymail.co.uk/columnists/article-306378/Why-I-loathe-Sixties.html

    David Skinner UK

  5. Well done. Dr Judith Reisman is our US expert on Kinsey. Our Coalition is fighting the Global Sexual Rights Agenda through Family Watch International.org

    Colleagues have launched the SexEdSitOut.com on April 23rd. It is going global.

    Also, check out my blog ExposeSexEdNow.com. It is US but details the Kinsey Krap we find in Comprehensive Sexualization Education.

    Mary McLellan MS, SRAS
    Sexual Risk Avoidance Specialist
    Founder, Protect Child Health Coalition

  6. Sorry to have gone off topic and hope this not too long. But surely the elephant in the room is the connection between homosexuality paedophilia and pederasty. It is our children they are after.

    The connection between homosexuality and paedophilia, pederasty and ephebophilia, does not require statistical proof, though if one wishes to quote official figures this can actually be found in UK Home Office figures, which comes to about 33% of paedophilia which can be attributed to a small proportion of a small proportion of the public who are gay. Bearing mind that the figure quoted in 201 of the National Office of Statistic was that only 1- 2 % of the population was gay, this would mean that it was a small number indeed who are disproportionately represented amongst those who sexually molest boys.
    Almost all child abuse is committed by men, up to one third is homosexual
    Professor Grubin finds that less than 5% of sex offences against children are known
    to have been committed by women.20 He reports that a reasonable estimate is that
    “approximately 20 – 33% of child abuse is homosexual in nature and about 10%
    mixed”.21 Why is there so much homosexual abuse when only 0.3% of men are
    exclusively homosexual?

    The history of the gays driving down the age of consent for homosexual acts, both male and female so as to gain access to our children leaves a clear trail.
    The numbers game is a pointless task because both sides can quote competing so called statistical analysts, or interpret the data to suit their argument. All we need to do is look at historical fact .Throughout history homosexuality has been associated with man boy love, particularly amongst the Greeks. The homosexuals themselves wanting to put as much distance as possible between “loving gay relationships” and paedophiles or pederasty identify those men as described in Romans 1 27 who “abandoned their natural sexual function toward females and burned with lust toward one another|” and as males who “ committed indecent acts with males, and received within themselves the appropriate penalty for their perversion”, as paedophiles. No one mentioned the paedophile connection until they did. It is they who make the connection.

    David Skinner UK

  7. Of course in the forefront of promoting this is the media. Playboy may have been based on the instruments of immoral sexuality as promulgated by Kinsley but it was an overwhelming commercial interest. While commercial media will do whatever it makes money from, which historically has often been immorality, the public media has a mandate to be balanced plus an unofficial mandate and reason for existence, to create a balancing force against commercial interests. Unfortunately, in the case of perverted sexuality and anti-family causes, these forces are on the same side and the Marxist promoting public media can create a false notion of “balance” which ignores this truth and enables it to get away with constantly promoting its propaganda and pornography. In the past democratic controls put a limitation on this but now, despite using public money to constantly present their agenda, if anything is done about it they cry foul with “freedom of the press” type calls for editorial and journalistic anarchy. This is why we need a royal commission inquiry into public media so that the biases of the public media can be highlighted and addressed and some true balance introduced. Without this the constant brainwashing from the media’s perversion will only ever have an increasing effect and, as has already been shown, undermine the basic reason why and as to how democracy works.


    Queensland Rally
    1pm – 3pm Saturday 21 April at Parliament House

    Victoria Rally
    1pm – 3pm Saturday 21 April. Meet at Treasury Gardens at 12.30pm (2-18 Spring St, East Melbourne) and march together to Parliament Steps at 1pm.

    ACT Rally
    1pm – 3pm Saturday 21 April at ACT Legislative Assembly. 196 London Circuit, Canberra.

    (I am not an organiser, but I got an invitation to this protest:)

    From the Organisers:
    “We are holding NATIONAL PARENT PROTEST against the highly sexualised and gender fluid ideologies of the Safe Schools and associated programs (Respectful Relationships, Catching On Early, Catching On Later and others founded by the Australian Safe Schools Coalition) to our children.
    The protest will be taking place near each state’s house of Parliament.
    Parents and supporters, THIS IS YOUR CHANCE to fight back to protect our children from these harmful ideologies. You can bring kids if you would like. Please invite your friends and family members. We need as many people as possible to WIN this war!”

    Find out more at:


  9. Don’t forget the role of the United Nations in all this, Bill. No matter what the topic at the Commission on the Status of Women – access to clean water, the health of rural women, women and the natural environment – Comprehensive Sexuality Education (CSE) is seen as a solution. Family Watch International has some very good information on the promotion of CSE worldwide. Reading it through it all looks very similar to what is being foisted on us in Australia.

  10. Hi Bill, you will truly be able to say “I told you so”. I don’t believe the time is that far off when many of the Gay Initiatives will come to fruition.
    Your piece gives a complete picture of what has and what will soon come to pass. Reading David Skinner’s contribution, especially his observations on the Gay Manifesto, is rather horrifying.
    Bill Heggers

  11. How many parents who are informed about the (Un)Safe School Program and its materials being implemented in their child’s school have actually withdrawn their child from that school e.g., Balwyn High, Kew High, Carey Baptist College, etc…? Remember Luke 17: 2 also applies to parents, the politicians and their supporters as well as the principals and teachers.
    As any experienced teacher and parent will tell you most Programs not just the (Un)Safe Schools Program and/or its material can be effectively implemented throughout the curriculum going mostly undetected in the school community until a substantial number of incidents/victims are identified.
    Does anyone know of the statistics about exits in these schools and/or others with the (Un)SSP?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *