CultureWatch

Bill Muehlenberg's commentary on issues of the day...

Homosexual Truth Tellers

Mar 17, 2015

Yes, there are some homosexuals who are willing to go against the grain – even against their own militant lobby – and speak truth about homosexuality. And when they do speak truth, all hell breaks loose. It seems there is nothing worse than for a homosexual to break ranks with his own.

Of course we see this all the time with various militant ideologies. All these groups whine about tolerance and acceptance, but they refuse to show it even to their own when they dare to say a contrary word. Consider for example the angry atheists. If any atheist dares to turn away from his atheism, he is treated like a pariah, like scum, like dirt.

Simply consider the incredible case of world-renowned atheist Antony Flew. When he decided that the evidence must be followed, and that it leads away from atheism, he was viciously attacked by his own. They claimed he was going senile and so on, and went apoplectic in their denunciations. I discuss his story here: billmuehlenberg.com/2007/11/21/a-review-of-there-is-a-god-by-antony-flew/

And as we all know, Islam also treats their own “rebels” this way. To dare to question Islam means you are an apostate and you deserve the death penalty. There is absolutely no room for dissent in Islam. One either accepts the whole package, or prepares to lose his head.

It is exactly the same with the radical homosexual lobby. If any one of their own dares to deviate just an inch from the official party line, then all hell will break out as the dissidents are targeted, tracked down, and torn to shreds. Pretty much like the Communists used to do to supposed traitors in fact.

Dolce and Gabbana 1And we have the perfect example of this now unfolding before our very eyes. But first a brief confession: I am obviously not in the know, since I never heard of “Dolce & Gabbana” until now. Evidently this is some fancy-smancy Italian fashion label, and evidently these are two fashion designers, who also happen to be homosexuals.

Well, it seems that they have done the unthinkable – and the unforgiveable. In a magazine interview this homosexual pair actually did what you are simply not allowed to do by the pink mafia: reject the party line in favour of some truth-telling and some common sense.

And for this they have been utterly crucified, not just by the gaystapo, but by their zombie supporters in the media and pop culture. Wow, it is as if they came out and said that we all should torture kittens for fun and profit. But what they actually said is far worse, according to the homostazi.

In the March 12 edition of the Italian magazine Panorama they said things that homosexuals are expressly forbidden from saying. Let me offer some of their words here:

You are born and you have a father and a mother. Or at least it should be so, why do not convince me what I call the children of chemistry, synthetic children. Wombs for rent, seeds selected from a catalog. And then go on to explain to these children who the mother. But she would agree to be the daughter of chemistry? Procreate must be an act of love, now even psychiatrists are prepared to deal with the effects of these experiments….
I’m gay, I cannot have a child. I believe that we cannot have everything in life, if there is not to say that there must be. It is also good to deprive yourself of something. Life has its natural course, there are things that must not be changed. And one of these is the family.

And it seems that they “have long been outspoken about gay marriage. In 2013, when the London Telegraph asked them if they had ever considered getting married, they answered, ‘What? Never!’ Dolce said, ‘I’m a practicing Catholic’.”

Hmm, all that sounds perfectly sensible to me. But the cultural elites went absolutely berserk over this. Incensed celebs like Elton John, Ricky Martin, Sharon Stone, and Ryan Murphy foamed at the mouth, calling for their heads on a platter. Once again they demonstrated to the whole world just how tolerant and into diversity these folks really are.

Elton John for example almost blew a gasket as he raged in hate against the pair:

How dare you refer to my beautiful children as “synthetic”. And shame on you for wagging your judgmental little fingers at IVF – a miracle that has allowed legions of loving people, both straight and gay, to fulfil their dream of having children. Your archaic thinking is out of step with the times, just like your fashions. I shall never wear Dolce and Gabbana ever again. #BoycottDolceGabbana

Wow, feel the Lurve! Not to be outdone, “Glee” screenwriter Ryan Murphy tweeted this: “These designers’ horrifying views are never in fashion. Their clothes are as ugly as their hate.” We get more sweetness and light from Courtney Love Cobain: “Just round up all my Dolce & Gabbana pieces, I want to burn them. I’m just beyond words and emotions. Boycott senseless bigotry! #boycottD&G”

Militant homosexual celeb Perez Hilton said, “Because I choose to spend my money wisely & not support self-hating gays who view my son as ‘synthetic’!” Self-hating now?! So anyone who dares to think for themselves and offer a different point of view are simply “self-haters” and therefore can be completely written off.

Hmm, sounds just like how the Nazis used to demonise their opponents. Or how the communists treated dissidents. Welcome to the Brave New World of homo-hate. Welcome to the Stalinist world of death to the dissenters. Welcome to the Orwellian world of groupthink, agitprop and Big Brother.

I am glad this pair had the courage to speak their mind. It shows that a bit of freedom still exists in the world. But I am even more thankful for the predictable hate responses from the militants. They prove my point so much better than I ever could: the haters are gonna hate, and those who scream the loudest about tolerance are the least tolerant folks around.

www.panorama.it/news/cronaca/dolce-gabbana-lunica-famiglia-quella-tradizionale/
allenbwest.com/2015/03/gay-designers-dolce-and-gabbana-come-out-against-gay-marriage-and-parenting/
www.businessinsider.com.au/elton-john-boycots-dolce-and-gabbana-2015-3

[1008 words]

17 Responses to Homosexual Truth Tellers

  • If you feel like supporting Dolce and Gabbana:
    https://www.lifesitenews.com/petitions/i-support-dolce-and-gabbana

  • Interesting that the clothes designers are speaking up about the modern day equivalent of The Emperor’s New Clothes? How dare they!!!

    Gay people have been complaining about everybody bashing the gay community just because they don’t think the same way, and now all these outraged “celebrities” do the same thing?

    I hope the boycott fails and D and G get lots of free publicity…Trying to create a mob of like-minded people to threaten and intimidate someone into believing what you want or punishing them on a large scale is hateful and intolerant.

  • Bill, thank you for bringing this important news to our attention. You are always on the forefront of current affairs. I appreciate this greatly.

    I would be a little cautious about holding these two homosexual men as role-models of traditional marriage and family though. I did a little research and whilst it’s unclear what their motivation is, they seem to have changed their tune afterwards:

    Gabbana said in a statement Sunday that “it was never our intention to judge other people’s choices. We do believe in freedom and love.”

    Dolce says he was expressing his view about family based on his experience growing up in a traditional Sicilian family “made up of a mother, a father and children. I am very well aware of the fact that there are other types of families and they are as legitimate as the one I’ve known.”

    Dolce said he was expressing his personal views “without judging other people’s choices.”

    http://bigstory.ap.org/article/81c0673bb729474586c2e8b553b8bd4e/dolcegabbana-say-comments-about-family-not-meant-judge

    I think it would be fair to say that they cannot be trusted as being on side with biblical Christianity or with the true and correct meaning of what marriage and family is, especially when it comes to the teachings of our lord Jesus.

    Bless you Bill.

  • Thanks Albert. But of course I did not say they are role models or on side. I simply said they were willing to speak some truth about marriage and family which is anathema to the homosexual activists. I will take truth wherever I can get it from. And yes I did see their later back-tracking.

    Moreover, the quote I offer in the piece gives them away of course: ‘I’m a practicing Catholic’. You can’t be real follower of Christ and a practicing homosexual at the same time. But thanks for your thoughts. Bless you too.

  • Well written Bill, as per usual, I always enjoy reading your articles 🙂

  • Great article. Good on Dolce Gabbana for resisting the fascism of the “gaystapo”.

    There are many Christians who have the “inclination” towards being “gay” BUT have decided to be CELIBATE for the remainder of their lives. Yes, CELIBATE. They too believe that their “inclination” is “disordered” and instead they will refrain from it with dignity and courage. After all, ALL Christians are obliged to “take up your cross and follow me” (as Jesus urged). We don’t have to sink to wallowing in self-indulgence as the atheists do.
    As well as that we know God’s attitude towards people who reject the Ten Commandments and the Bible warning about homosexuality and sins of the flesh.

    Now THERE’s a “dangerous idea” for the “gays” to consider!

  • To call children who are still real humans no matter how synthetic the manner of their creation may have been “synthetic children” doesn’t quite sit right with me for their sake, not for their “parents” sake. They are children who have to somehow come to terms with their messy and confused genetic and social history that must surely be enough for any human being to cope with without having to deal with the lable “synthetic” as well. and we pray that they will find a way to true salvation in Jesus
    Many blessings
    Ursula Bennett

  • I was pleased to read about D&G’s stance on gay marriage yesterday. Not so pleased to read this today though. The great falling away continues.
    http://www.news.com.au/world/breaking-news/us-presbyterians-approve-gay-marriage/story-e6frfkui-1227267739118

  • Yes Linda, homosexuality really is becoming the defining issue, separating the sheep from the goats:

    https://billmuehlenberg.com/2015/02/23/homosexuality-and-the-great-falling-away/

  • Hello all!

    How about supporting these brave men practically, and asking your mates to do the same?

    https://www.lifesitenews.com/petitions/i-support-dolce-and-gabbana

    God bless

    Warmly,
    Lisa Nolland (UK)

  • The whole thing is amusing – from one perspective.
    The Lord sits in the heavens and laughs.

    Since marriage, one flesh, male-female, has a genuinely ontological thrust, like gravity, it cannot ultimately be defied. These guys just acknowledged what is so.

    It is encouraging for all who are prone to become dismayed, to see that this is still clear to those willing to see.

    Romans speaks of ‘suppressing the truth’. It is rather like trying to hold a bunch of inflated balloons underwater – they keep springing to the top.

  • Signed both petitions. I hope they hold firm.

  • “Think of the Child” Ad campaign – banned by “mardi gras”

    See Video: “Marriage Equality”? . What about Equality for Kids?
    http://australianmarriage.org/think-of-the-child-welcome-to-our-multimedia-campaign/

    Plus see video by Dr. David van Gend. (share these with others ASAP)
    URL: http://youtu.be/7tZzbfsTeYE

    MEDIA RELEASE Saturday 7th March, 2015
    Australian Marriage Forum ad broadcast during Mardi Gras
    – opposes “marriage equality” and calls for “equality for kids”

    “For too long the same-sex ‘marriage’ debate has been framed solely in terms of the demands of adults”, according to Dr David van Gend, President of the Australian Marriage Forum, speaking at the launch today of a multimedia campaign opposing same-sex marriage.
    [However] “We intend to reframe the debate in terms of the fundamental human right of every child to have, wherever possible, both a mother and a father. That birth-right would be abolished by the institution of same-sex ‘marriage’, which carries with it the right to adoption and surrogacy. That deprivation is an INJUSTICE against the child”.

    Discrimination against the child
    Dr van Gend explained the timing of the launch this weekend: “We decided to broadcast our TV ad at the time of the Mardi Gras Parade because it is a political protest rally, broadcast nationally, which features a ‘marriage equality’ float. Our ad is a gentle but direct counter-protest, pointing out that ‘marriage equality’ for adults always means inequality for kids. That is the discrimination at the heart of so-called ‘marriage equality’, and that is what we oppose.”
    “Beyond that injustice against the child, our campaign will address other grave consequences of normalising homosexual ‘marriage’ in law, such as the radicalising of sex-education and the crushing of conscientious and religious freedom [NOTE: plus crushing FREEDOM OF SPEECH***] with the full force of anti-discrimination law”, Dr van Gend said, during a promotional video for the ‘Think of the Child’ campaign.
    [*** in several states in the USA people are being prosecuted in court – and losing – for eg: “declininng to decorate a ‘gay-wedding’ cake” because the decorator did not believe she could do so in clear conscience”. Many such objectors have gone broke, or chosen jail, rather than comply with demands of the savage fascist “gay-gestapo”].
    It’s really happening as we speak!!!

    A choice and a challenge
    Dr van Gend, who is a family doctor in Queensland, explained how society is confronted with a choice between giving priority to the demands of homosexual adults OR to the rights of the child. “We have to choose; we CANNOT honour BOTH the right of the child to have a mother and father, AND the demand of same-sex couples to marry and form motherless or fatherless families”, he said.
    “In our view, same-sex couples are free to live as they choose, but they are NOT free to IMPOSE a motherless or fatherless life on a child.”
    “I conclude with a fact, a judgement and a challenge”, Dr van Gend said today.
    ? “The fact is that instituting marriage without a woman creates families without a mother.
    ? The judgement is that it is wrong of us to deliberately deprive children of their mother.
    ? The challenge, for all those activists and journalists who advocate “marriage equality”, is to justify this profoundly unequal treatment of children, this violation of the deepest bond in a baby’s life, this discrimination against kids done in the name of ‘equality’ for homosexual adults.” (they will find NO justification).
    “Whether activists take that challenge to heart depends on their capacity to ‘Think of the Child'”, Dr van Gend concluded.

    Question? Are such people – who live so immersed in their own selfishness – prepared to be merciful enough to cast off their unbridled greed, in order to seek genuine JUSTICE for children as well as the “common good” for the whole community?

    – Now let’s see how honest they really are!

Leave a Reply