Babies No, Whales Yes

The twin headlines in a Sunday newspaper said it all: “US ends stem cell ban;” “Obama’s whale stance”. Here we have more proof – as if more proof was needed – that America has the most pro-death president ever. Obama has been taking all sorts of actions against life, and his latest actions are simply more of the same.

Obama’s war against the unborn continues apace, but at least he cares a lot about whales. While overturning a ban on federal funding of destructive embryonic stem cell research, he has announced that the US will firmly oppose whaling.

The former Bush administration was right to ban federal funding of embryonic stem cell research back in August 2001. Extracting stem cells from a human embryo of course kills this very young member of the human race. Hardly any human therapies or cures have come from these stem cells. Adult stem cells which are ethically non-problematic have had all the runs on the board, with over 70 known cures and benefits.

And the technology has moved beyond embryonic stem cell research anyway. For several years now a much more effective method – and one that does not involve destroying an embryo – has been in use. What is known as induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS cells) has been on the table now since at least November 2007.

This new method allows a patient’s skin cells to be genetically altered and reprogrammed to a pluripotent state. Pluripotent cells are those which have the ability to develop into any type of somatic cell. These iPS cells can basically do everything embryonic stem cells can, without the taking of human life.

Thus Obama is backing a dead horse here. His move was really one of ideology, not science. This is unethical politics at its worst. The way ahead is with ethical stem cell science, not the old, unethical, and unfruitful route using embryonic stem cells.

As Marjorie Dannenfelser, President of the Susan B. Anthony List, noted, “Compassion can never be built upon callous disregard for human life. True scientific integrity is advancing successful science that respects moral standards and the inherent value of human life at all stages. Our country is facing an acute economic crisis, and it is shocking to learn that President Obama’s first priority is promoting the idea that American taxpayers should fund the destruction of human life.”

She continued, “There is no coincidence that this policy reversal was timed to secure the maximum amount of taxpayer funds. The National Institutes of Health received $10.4 billion dollars in the Obama Stimulus Package. Today’s executive order reversing the Bush policy allows the President to fast-track billions of taxpayer dollars toward embryonic stem cell research – all without the benefit of public or Congressional debate.”

Americans United for Life president Charmaine Yoest said, “Embryonic stem cell research is the research of the past. Millions of dollars have been spent on embryonic stem cell research and it has failed. To pour more money into it is simply a waste. If we’re going to put tax dollars into research – particularly at a time of unprecedented federal deficits – it needs to be research that protects life and helps patients now. Even more, this research destroys lives at the very earliest stage of development. Adult stem cell research is helping people now.”

Or as Operation Rescue President Troy Newman put it, “Obama’s policy of forcing tax payers to fund lethal human experimentation is morally unethical and fiscally irresponsible. Destructive, human, embryonic stem cell research has produced no therapies that have benefitted people, and has only produced horrific side effects in preliminary test subjects. It would be more beneficial to the country to pour that money down a rat hole, than to fund such ghoulish experiments.”

The sanctity of human life is a core biblical principle, yet pro-abortion Obama managed to dupe many evangelical Christians into voting for him. His calls for change and social justice must have resonated with many. But his change is all about killing babies, and his justice is only for abortionists and those in Big Biotech who stand to gain financially.

There is certainly no justice for the unborn. Indeed, the fundamental human right is the right to life. Killing unborn babies has nothing to do with social justice or human rights, but everything to do with a callous disregard for human life and an abysmal disrespect for those who are most vulnerable and most in need of protection.

This is not the first anti-life action of Obama, and it will not be his last. The only question is, how much more death and destruction will he unleash before it is too late to stem the tide.{9305DDC7-1F63-4BD1-B6B6-86DAC14E0D2D}&notoc=1

[781 words]

4 Replies to “Babies No, Whales Yes”

  1. Bill, this fellow has modelled himself on Abe Lincoln. With his extremely divisive polarizing agenda he may well emulate his hero in an untimely demise. Already his strongly disapproval rating has climbed from 16% to 32% in just 5 weeks.
    John FG McMahon

  2. If a vote was taken, I think the majority of ‘almighty’ Americans will side with Obama. Judgement is coming. And it’s coming to ‘almighty’ USA. Is it already here and hitting it hard? USA will be humbled. This could just be a starter and the worst is yet to come and hit the whole planet earth but I hope not. Nevertheless, I tremble and fear. God forgive us and have mercy upon your people.
    Barry Koh

  3. Hi Bill. Where are Jim Wallis, Rick Warren, and Tony Campolo to save us? Do they have web sites dedicated to helping us write to Obama about our concerns? I’m sure they are championing the pro-life cause here and telling us about how much influence they have with the new administrations, NO?

    And what about all those ‘me too, I’m bi-partisan and cool’ new breed evangelicals and emergent types…? All their cool blogs and wikis and social networks are buzzing about these developments, NO? Well in-short the answer is in-fact, NO. Evangelicals have been betrayed by intelligent sounding (or not sounding-the-alarm, as the case may be) PC evan-jellyfish. Apparently not a few were duped. Some more easily than others and some were persuaded more by the pleasant tones and friendships of the otherwise very in tune and bright evan-jellyfish friends that there will be ‘peace peace, when there is (in fact) no peace’, not in the womb, not in Iraq, not with Hamas, not in Afghanistan, not in Pakistan, not in the markets…and our sensitive Saviors take themselves FAR too seriously, and the real vulnerable and the much more relatively innocent, in a FAR too cavalier manner.

    Thanks for your voice, Bill. God bless you!
    Joe Whitchurch, Indianna, USA

  4. Joe you can find Jim Wallis at Sojourners@ espousing his “brand” of faith. Can I throw up now?

    Duped, I don’t think anyone was duped. I believe whole heartedly these PC Evan Jellyfish saw their own prosperity,their own pockets lined and their itchy ears hearing what they wanted to.

    Heather Harrison

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *