More Hypocrisy and Hatred from the Left

Boy, how the poison of the left has been gushing out. With the announcement of a genuine conservative Vice Presidential candidate, the loopy left has gone on the war path, pushing vile smears, hatred and duplicity. I have not seen so much nastiness for years. It’s a good thing Sarah Palin is tough as nails. She will need to be.

Simply making the rounds of the leftist blogosphere shows just how much hatred and resentment there is out there. Or simply look closer to home. Check out the letters’ page of the Melbourne Age for example. There you will find one nasty comment after another about the 44-year-old Republican VP candidate.

Charges of inexperience are among the more hypocritical coming from the left. Palin has had far more experience than Obama in actually running a government. As one Republican leader put it, “The facts are that Sarah Palin has made more executive decisions as a Mayor and Governor than Barack Obama has made in his life.” And she is only running for VP. It is Hussein Obama who wants the top job, and has next to zero experience.

The hatred of the left is evident in other ways. Consider the charges being made that Palin is merely a token female. Such accusations are laughable. The simple truth is, if Obama had picked a young female as a running mate, the left would have been gushing all over the place, applauding his inclusivity and non-sexism. But because Palin is a conservative, a mother, a Christian, and a pro-lifer to boot, the left is livid, and is pouring out its hatred.

Columnist Rich Lowry picks up this theme in a recent article: “Palin-hatred is an artifact of who she is rather than anything she’s done. Joe Biden famously rose from the working class to the U.S. Senate. Palin became governor of Alaska, but never left the working class – with her old-fashioned beehive hairdo and librarian eyeglasses, with a husband who is a commercial fisherman and works on a North Shore oil field, and with her hobbies of fishing and hunting. As such, she’s the object of the cultural disdain of a left that loves the working class in theory, but is mystified or offended by its lifestyle and conservative values in reality. If there’s ever been an exemplar of the rural America that, in Barack Obama’s telling, ‘bitterly’ clings to its guns and religion, it’s Sarah Palin.”

Then we have the hypocrisy of the leftist feminists, who have always argued that the only good woman is a career woman. Now we have a woman who has a career, and they all of a sudden worry that she can’t be a good mum! Am I missing something here? The fems have always insisted that women can have it all: work and family simultaneously. Now they seem to be not so sure.

Says Lowry, “In a less-poisonous atmosphere, Palin might have diminished the intensity of the ‘mommy wars.’ Here were traditionalist conservatives hailing a very busy working mom with five kids, including a handicapped 4-month-old. But the same feminists who ordinarily dismiss stay-at-home moms as benighted betrayers of the sisterhood now question whether Palin can juggle her family and political responsibilities. Washington doyenne Sally Quinn worries about putting ‘the mother of young children in a job outside the home that will demand so much of her time and energy’.”

The left really does not champion minorities, be they women or blacks or what have you. What they champion are politically correct minorities: “It’s her misfortune to be a pioneer with the wrong ideology. So much bile was directed at Clarence Thomas because he was the ‘wrong’ kind of black man. Pro-life, pro-gun and a down-the-line, if populist, conservative, Palin is a traitor to her gender and thus encounters the sort of fury always directed at apostates.”

And the hypocrisy over inexperience just does not cut it. “A lot of Palin-hatred is couched in terms of her lack of experience. Fair enough, but there’s a tone of contemptuous dismissiveness about the experience that she does have – fueled no doubt by her career in ‘fly-over country’ so remote no one really flies over it. The Obama campaign is loath to admit that she’s governor of Alaska, pretending instead she’s still mayor of tiny Wasilla, and the outraged commentary in the press makes it sound like the vice presidency is an office of such import that it would be better if the newcomer were at the top of the ticket and the wizened pro at the bottom – just like the Democrats.”

He concludes, “Is Palin ready to take over on Day One? No. But she’s not being asked to be president on Day One, but vice president in what will probably be a post-Cheney, more traditional model of the office. She has no less political experience than John Edwards when he was a one-term senator who had never before held elected office when he was John Kerry’s running mate in 2004.”

The truth is, the left is enraged because it knows that McCain’s choice could well be a winner, and the left may be locked out of high office for another four years. Whether that happens remains to be seen. But the more hatred, bile and nastiness we see coming from the left, the more we must think that Palin has something pretty good going for her.

[902 words]

6 Replies to “More Hypocrisy and Hatred from the Left”

  1. The hatred is unbelievable. What has she done in two days to cause these people to hate her so much? It’s unthinking, bigoted, irrational and knee jerk.
    Tas Walker

  2. An interesting echo, here, of the same kind of indignant mud-slinging that came from the Left in the UK when it was recently announced that ex-Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher will have a state funeral (not that she’s dead yet, I hasten to add). I consider myself neither ‘Left’ nor ‘Right’ yet I had to agree with the observation of one British newspaper – for all the Left likes to portray itself as the custodians of compassion, inclusivity and a fair deal for all, it needs lessons from no-one in puerile vindictiveness whenever its tail is tweaked.
    Jeffrey Prest, UK

  3. Thanks Jeffrey

    Yes the left and their buddies in the MSM have much to answer for here. I like what the Christian Defense Coalition said about the media attacks on Palin’s pregnant daughter:

    We want “to remind the press that there was not this kind of hysteria when:
    -Senator John Edwards had an affair while his wife was dying with cancer.
    -President Bill Clinton sexually manipulated a 19 year old intern while she performed sex acts with him in the Oval Office during official state business.
    -Senator Obama admitted to using cocaine and other drugs.
    -Senator Biden plagiarized speeches and exaggerated his college career and had to withdraw from the 1988 Presidential race in disgrace.
    In light of these episodes, it is stunning and pathetic to see the media go after a 17 year old girl who has absolutely nothing to do with the Presidential campaign and whose situation is a private family matter.”

    Bill Muehlenberg, CultureWatch

  4. This is a very amusing article talking of her writers group in Los Angeles. By Judy Gruen.

    “I was stunned not only by the number of anti-Palin posts, but also the vehemence. ‘The more I get to know her, the more I loathe her,’ posted one graduate of the Daily Kos Academy. ‘The more I get to know her, the more I like her,’ I shot back, with my invisible flak jacket and helmet. It would have been impossible and futile to try to fight the gossip gallery, but I couldn’t resist posting my own fascination with the group’s Palin-bashing: ‘What is this frenzy about?’ I asked. ‘If you loathe her politics, fine and fair, but these smears, so many of which are quickly being proven untrue, is nearly unprecedented in my memory, and I’ve been watching politics for a long time. I am particularly struck by this in a group of writers, who understand the need to get facts right before ‘reporting’ them. Unfortunately for those on the left, the more bias and dirt that’s thrown her way, the more money and support the Republican ticket gets’.”

    Jennifer Parfenovics

  5. Dear Bill,
    This is off the issue or is it, but have you heard of this? More Hypocrisy and Hatred from the Left….
    September 14, 2008, Oregon’s Suicidal Approach to Health Care by Rita L. Marker

    “Oregon seems to have found a surefire way to lower health care costs: Tell the patient you’ll pay for drugs that will end her life, but not those that would extend her life. Here’s how it works: In May 2008, 64-year-old retired school bus driver Barbara Wagner received bad news from her doctor. She found out that her cancer, which had been in remission for two years, had returned. Then, she got some good news. Her doctor gave her a prescription that would likely slow the cancer’s growth and extend her life. She was relieved by the news and also by the fact that she had health care coverage through the Oregon Health Plan.

    “It didn’t take long for her hopes to be dashed. Barbara Wagner was notified by letter that the Oregon Health Plan wouldn’t cover her prescription. But the letter didn’t leave it at that. It also notified her that, although it wouldn’t cover her prescription, it would cover assisted suicide. After Wagner’s story appeared in the Eugene Register-Guard, the Oregon Health Plan acknowledged that it routinely sends similar letters to patients who have little chance of surviving more than five years, informing them that the health plan will pay for assisted suicide (euphemistically categorized as ‘comfort care’), but not for treatment that could help them live for months or years. Certainly, spending $100 for deadly drugs is cost effective. And, ever since the Oregon Death with Dignity Act transformed the crime of assisted suicide into a ‘medical treatment’ more than ten years ago, it has been perfectly legal. Oregon doctors prescribe lethal overdoses of drugs. Pharmacists dispense them, sometimes with instructions to ‘take all of this with a light snack and alcohol to cause death.’ Patients die after taking them.”

    Jennifer Parfenovics

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: