CultureWatch

Bill Muehlenberg's commentary on issues of the day...

Canada’s Ugly Gender Agenda

Feb 23, 2013

All over the West we are witnessing moral meltdowns and gender madness. Radical activist groups and trendy elites are insisting that sexuality and gender are entirely open-ended, and that anything goes. Indeed, gender is just a social construct anyway, so let’s pull out all the stops, and declare a war on nature.

Sexual politics thus keeps getting further and further out of control. Witness another recent indication of this: “gender neutral” restrooms. Yep, you heard me right. Men and women are identical in every respect, these activists insist, so it is wrong and discriminatory to have ‘his’ and ‘her’ bathrooms. Consider what is happening in Canada concerning these matters.

One report says this: “An LGBTQ advocacy group at the University of Regina is congratulating itself for being instrumental in the establishment of ‘gender neutral’ restrooms at the school. ‘After two long years of planning and negotiating, the University of Regina will have 10 gender neutral washrooms on campus,’ the UR Pride Centre for Sexuality and Gender Diversity announced last week on its website. ‘We will also have a hilarious  “how to guide” available shortly.’

“Washrooms catering to LGBTQ students are already de rigeur in many Canadian universities, including Dalhousie, St. Thomas University, Queens, Carleton, McGill, the University of Victoria, and the University of Manitoba, to name but a few.

“The newly designated bathrooms on campus are the same single person-use facilities that previously had a sign indicating they could be used by either sex. They are marked by a male and female stick figure and the word ‘restroom’.

“New signs now show the same stick figures but ‘restroom’ has been replaced with the words ‘gender neutral,’ followed by an explanation that reads: ‘This restroom may be used by any person regardless of gender identity or expression’….

“Barbara Pollock, the university’s vice president of external relations, said, ‘Around here we have about 13,000 people in our community…and in that group there are people who can feel threatened in a single gender washroom. When we were asked if we could consider converting some to gender-neutral we said, “Yes, let’s do it”.’”

“Threatened in a single gender washroom”. What next? Will we cater specially for those who feel threatened wearing lipstick? Pushing prams? Playing checkers? Walking in a park? Eating pancakes? Driving Toyotas? Reading cookbooks? What sort of madness has descended upon us when the radicals want to utterly destroy gender and the natural differences between men and women?

Fortunately not everyone is thrilled with this social activism and sexual suicide. The Canadian group Campaign Life Coalition has been hard at work on this one, seeking to prevent this insanity from being inflicted upon the nation. They provide a bit of historical background here:

“Over the past several years in both Canada and the United States, there has been a concerted effort by gay activists to create a spurious, new right to ‘gender identity’ and ‘gender expression’. In 2011, private member’s Bill C-389 died in the Senate when the Canadian federal election was called. Despite a Conservative majority, its successor in the next parliament, Bill C-279, shockingly passed second reading on June 6th 2012 by a vote of 150 to 132. The third reading vote is scheduled to occur February 27, 2013.

“The gay lobby has successfully portrayed this legislation as ‘innocuous’, and a mere tweaking of the Human Rights Code to ensure gender-confused persons are protected from ‘discrimination’. A slim majority of federal politicians appear to have accepted this line of reasoning.

“A close examination of what it means to grant special status to groups who self-define by ‘gender expression’ and ‘gender identity’ reveals implications that are far-reaching. Politicians, by passing Bill C-279, would unleash unintended consequences that are seriously damaging to freedom of speech, freedom of religion, the personal security of women and even to the individuals who suffer with the psychological problem known as Gender Identity Disorder (GID).”

The article continues. “There is strong evidence that adding ‘gender identity’ and/or ‘gender expression’ to the Human Rights Act will give gender-confused men a basis for seeking the legal right to use female-only facilities. For example, in June 2006, Mr. John Fulton the owner of the Downtown Health Club for women in St. Catharines, ON received a phone call from a man demanding membership access. The man turned out to be a ‘transsexual’ who had not yet undergone sex reassignment surgery.  This gender-confused man wanted full access to the women’s only gym which included 24 hour access to the showers, locker rooms and bathrooms. When Mr. Fulton refused, the man filed a challenge with the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario….

“Pro-family groups such as Concerned Women of America have warned that these ‘gender identity’ laws will increase the already rising incidence of bathroom attacks on women by sexual predators, who will count on using the new law as an alibi if they get caught. The government ought not risk making it easier for sexual predators to escape justice and re-offend another day.

“To be clear, we’re not saying that individuals who identify as ‘transgendered’ are sexual predators. Rather, there will be an increased legal opportunity for sexual predators and peeping toms who pretend to be ‘transgendered’, to enter female bathrooms.  These miscreants will count on being able to escape prosecution, if caught or suspected, by simply claiming that they’re ‘transgendered’ and they are just exercising the right to ‘express their female gender’. How can a police officer possibly know otherwise?

“Several women have been killed in the United States in bathroom attacks, and there have been numerous reports of attacks in Canada as well. Do we really want to make it easier for sexual predators to get in close quarters with vulnerable women by pretending to be transgendered?”

But these militant activists and social engineers really don’t give a rip about such ugly consequences. All they care about is thoroughly destroying society and all of its long-standing social institutions and sexual values, replacing it all with their radical social and sexual anarchy.

Indeed, the activists know that such legislation is a great way to attack Christian businesses, charities and churches as well: “Adding the terms ‘gender identity’ and gender expression to the Act will lead to trampling of religious freedom and conscience rights. The militant activists pushing this bill are not interested in using it as a protective ‘shield’.  Instead, they will use it as a ‘sword’ to target Christian and other faith-based businesses, religious institutions and charities for holding biblical beliefs on human sexuality.

“This will also invite trouble for private businesses and even religious institutions which will be compelled by the law to permit their employees to dress up in the opposite sex. Is it beyond the pale to imagine a male employee at a Christian charity filing a human rights complaint for not being allowed to dress up as a woman while at work?”

Yes, all these attempts at radical social engineering are not only about destroying a nation, but singling out Christian moral concerns, beliefs and practices. The militants have declared war on everything we hold near and dear, and will not rest until our concerns have been muzzled and eliminated.

And children of course are the biggest losers here: “If you had a 9-year old daughter, how would you feel about a man going into the bathroom after her? How is that child supposed to discern whether the man in the bathroom with her is a rapist, a peeping tom, or merely an innocent ‘transsexual’ who thinks he’s a woman trapped in a man’s body? It is unconscionable for legislators to put vulnerable, female children in such a dangerous position.

“Legislators will also be removing that red-flag that all young girls naturally have when a man walks into the bathroom with them. If C-279 passes, it will make commonplace the presence of so-called ‘transgendered men’ in girls’ bathrooms, and greatly diminish that protective, red-flag warning that currently exists in our children.”

The diabolical nature of all this activism is clearly seen in how cavalier they are to the well-being of our most innocent and vulnerable citizens: our children. That alone should tell you all you need to know about these activists and their ugly, destructive agenda.

www.lifesitenews.com/news/university-of-regina-joins-growing-ranks-of-schools-installing-gender-neutr
www.campaignlifecoalition.com/index.php?p=Gender_Identity_laws

[1368 words]

24 Responses to Canada’s Ugly Gender Agenda

  • When I finished reading this Bill, I just happened to look at the “No comments” just below the article, I thought to myself, how could you comment anyway? What can you really say to all this hideous, satanic madness?
    Steve Davis

  • So the sexual predator has legal protection for stalking a 9-year old girl in a female public toilet, but her own father would not be permitted to go in to protect her. Are these people serious?
    Tim Seeley

  • Thanks Steve

    Yes one really is left speechless at such moonbattery.

    Bill Muehlenberg, CultureWatch

  • Thanks Tim

    That is the really scary part: they are in fact serious. Seriously depraved. Seriously mad. Seriously perverted.

    Bill Muehlenberg, CultureWatch

  • Unfortunately Canada has been going in this direction for a while. Christian pastors have already been prosecuted merely for preaching a sound, Biblical message against homosexuality.

    Mick Koster

  • More each day, I am seeing Biblical prophecy coming true – you know calling good evil, and evil good. The problem with the Politicians who design this type of laws, seems to be that they are unable to foresee the terrible consequences of such laws. Of course, if they lifted their respective heads from the sand occasionally, they just might (I did say just might!!) realise how stupidly destructive this type of law actually is.
    God bless you in your work Bill.
    Joan Davidson

  • You are one hundred percent right Bill, this is moonbattery, sexual preditation green flag, perverted minds and unsociable thinking, it is utter madness and depravity. Sadly to say with these gullible Politicians, if we were to put them all together they would be lucky to have a full brain between the lot of them.

    As for those who support and push such actions, if brains were dynamite they would not have enough to blow their heads off. For this little black Duck it is no way Jose, it is just not on and has to be opposed at every twist and turn by decent moral loving peoples.
    Leigh D Stebbins

  • Evil and stupidity working together. What a combination.

    David Morrison

  • The scriptures speak of the wickedness in the last days, and this is evident now. It is reassuring to note that Jesus will come and clean up the wicked when he comes. He won’t come until the world is ripe in iniquity and corruption. These unholy perverts are hastening their own demise. As a christian I must out of duty call these vile sinners and their political supporters to repentance. Considering the greater needs of communities in the world, why is anyone wasting time with such needless issues?

    Nebojsa M. Vidakovic

  • A misapplied quote of Voltaire. “To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticise.” This is a great quote no matter who said it.

    Ian Nairn

  • This just goes to show what can be done by a relatively few highly organised ideologues against a huge majority of isolated, brainwashed and disorganised individuals. Just what will it take to wake everybody up, get organised and start to defend the defenceless?

    Alan Williams, UK

  • This really is an excellent example of “special rights for some”. Tim Seeley’s comment (the second comment on this article) sums it up. Where non-specific gender toilets have existed in the world (in some places for quite a long time) there is no restriction on who goes in. However this seems to restrict who goes in – only those transgender etc people are allowed to…
    John Symons

  • And to think that the A.P.A. (USA) removed homosexuality from its list of mental health problems.
    We are now facing the consequences of this decision and it will get worse.
    And if you think that it is not happening here in the workplace, think again.

    Madge Fahy

  • But then Muhammad consummated his marriage to Aisha when she was only 9 years old. So I wouldn’t be surprised if some people in the hotel business, or government or media would not care what happened to the 9 year old girl you mentioned. It becomes more and more obvious that our society has lost its way. Jesus was very clear about building our house, be it life, family or country, on the rock.

    Rob Merrells

  • I hate to say it but I told you so. A few months ago one of my daughters picked out some clothes to try on at a chain store called “Cotton On,” here in Australia. I went back into the dressing room area with her and noticed males milling about everywhere and I asked the dressing room attendant if she could keep the males out of this area while my thirteen year old daughter tried on clothes. She looked at me with a mandatory but oddly nervous little “oh, get with the times woman” look and said, “oh no, we have unisex change rooms.” I took the clothes from my daughter and plonked them in the girl’s arms. “Good luck with all of that,” I said. “By the way, I have seven more children and lots of friends with big families.” My daughter resigned her will to mine and didn’t complain and I said to her, “mark my words. There will be unisex toilets next.” She giggled. I just showed her your article.

    Anna von Marburg

  • Thanks Anna

    Yes the slippery slope in action. And sadly it will only get worse – unless we all take a strong stance as you did and resist this madness.

    Bill Muehlenberg, CultureWatch

  • Without appearing to be facetious we could always change the system and have more designated wash-rooms, i.e.,
    Male. Female. Other. Don’t know.
    That should do. No Legislation needed

    Dennis Newland

  • I consider the abuse of the word “gender” to be another example of our language being seized and occupied by an alien ideology. The correct usage of the word “gender” is to describe an attribute of nouns. The attribute of animals and of human beings that is their sex is properly described by the word “sex”. In my NZ passport my sex is “M”. When I come across forms that ask for “gender” I strike the erroneous word out and write “sex” instead. I think we should all strive fiercely to resist the corruption of our language.

    Dominic Baron, NZ

  • Heaven help us !!!
    Anna Cook

  • So when are we getting gender neutral change rooms? Oh, I see cotton-on has cottoned on to the market of creeps already.

    Even before all this, I was concerned about some men spending long amounts of time in the open showers in the Male change rooms at the pool, so why now are we honouring them with genderless rooms to parade themselves in?

    Johannes Archer

  • A sad day here in NZ with the writing on the wall for gay marriage:

    www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10868100

    Peter Wall, NZ

  • Keep fighting Peter, keep fighting!

    Bill Muehlenberg, CultureWatch

  • How long will it be before we see similar laws to what is outlined below from Massachusetts in USA in Australia?? “Legal same-sex marriage” came into that state in 2004, so it has only taken 11 yrs to progress to this…

    Secondary Education (DESE) released an 11-page document on Friday outlining this and other new guidelines giving “transgender” students special status and privileges in Massachusetts schools. Some family advocates are calling the document, which was prepared with assistance from homosexual and transgender advocacy groups, “the most thorough, invasive, and radical transgender initiative ever seen on a statewide level.”

    The policy does not require a doctor’s note or even parental permission for a child to switch sexes in the eyes of Massachusetts schools. Only the student’s word is needed: If a boy says he’s a girl, as far as the schools are concerned, he’s a girl.

    See more at: www.lifesitenews.com/news/massachusetts-forces-schools-to-let-39transgender39-boys-use-girls39-restro/#sthash.i1ZAsoMY.dpuf

    Sadly, without a strong stand against ‘same-sex marriage’ in Australia, I can see a day when we will face similar laws & the 11yr timeframe between the passing of one law to the next may even be shorter …

    We really are living in the times when scripture talks about good being called evil & evil good.

    Howard Savage

  • Yes quite right Howard

    Bill Muehlenberg, CultureWatch

Leave a Reply