Resist Tyrannical Forced Injections

Victoria’s Dictator has utterly lost his mind:

The Dictator of Victoria has just announced that as many as 1.25 million Victorian workers MUST get the Covid jabs or they will be forced out of their work. This is tyranny of the worst kind: either take the jabs whether you like it or not, or lose your jobs, your livelihood, your income and your ability to feed your families.

As one news report puts it:

By Friday, October 15, every authorised worker in Victoria will need to have had at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine if they want to continue attending their workplace. Premier Daniel Andrews announced the change on Friday, saying the public health advice was a response to the record 1438 number of COVID cases on Thursday. The authorised workers will need to have their second dose by November 26. Mr Andrews said the new rule would cover about 1.25 million Victorians, most of whom had already had at least one vaccination.

This is monstrous. Yet plenty of clowns fully drowned in leftist panic and hysteria will still stupidly argue that there is choice here. Baloney – there is NO choice at all whatsoever in this. What we have is the sort of totalitarian coercion that we have seen in Stalin’s Russia, Hitler’s Germany, and Mao’s China. ‘You WILL do as the State dictates, or you will lose everything.’

Telling people that they must take a foreign substance into their body or lose the right to work and look after their loved ones is the height of authoritarian evil. There are many ways this can be challenged, but let me mention two: legal and moral.

This demand by Andrews simply opens up a huge can of legal worms. It is doubtful if it can stand. Let me very briefly refer to one very important legal discussion on this: the dissenting opinion by Fair Work Commission Deputy President Lyndall Dean on vaccines and ‘medical apartheid’:

The lengthy minority opinion by Dean must be carefully read and digested, and I will need to speak more to this in the near future. But here I can offer a few quotes from her dissenting opinion:

[105] The stated position of the Australian Government is that the vaccine is voluntary. On 21 July 2021, the Prime Minister in a media conference stated that “people make their own decisions about their own health and their own bodies. That’s why we don’t have mandatory vaccination in relation to the general population”.

[106] On 13 August 2021, the Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) and the Business Council of Australia (BCA) issued a joint statement on mandatory COVID vaccinations in which it acknowledged the Australian Government’s COVID vaccination policy that the vaccine is voluntary, and confirmed the views of the BCA and ACTU that “for the overwhelming majority of Australians, your work or workplace should not fundamentally alter the voluntary nature of vaccination”.

[107] The Fair Work Ombudsman has publicly stated that employers will need to have a “compelling reason” before requiring vaccinations, and that “the overwhelming majority of employers should assume that they can’t require their employees to be vaccinated against coronavirus”.

[108] Safe Work Australia has publicly stated that “most employers will not need to make vaccinations mandatory to meet their [health and safety] obligations”.

[109] Despite this, many employers are declaring they will mandate COVID vaccines for their workers, and PHOs are being made by State Governments, in circumstances where there is no justification for doing so.

Mandatory vaccination cannot be justified

[110] COVID vaccinations, in accordance with the Australian Government’s policy, must be freely available and voluntary for all Australians.

[111] Mandatory COVID vaccinations, however, cannot be justified in almost every workplace in Australia. While there are numerous reasons for this, this decision will focus on:

  1. a) the requirement for freely given and informed consent for medical procedures;

  2. b) denying an unvaccinated person the ability work on health and safety grounds, whether at the initiation of an employer or as part of a PHO; and

  3. c) the requirements to comply with disability discrimination laws.

I was going to also look at ethical and moral reasons why mandatory vaccinations are wrong. I was going to quote from a number of human rights and medical ethics documents from the past 75 years that say this very thing. But I see that Dean covered most of the ones I was going to, so let me quote more from her. She begins by looking at the 1947 Nuremberg Code, and goes on to say this:

[119] Informed and freely given consent is at the heart of the Code and is rightly viewed as a protection of a person’s human rights.

[120] The United Nations, including through the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, first proclaimed in 1948, has long recognised the right to bodily integrity.

[121] The Declaration of Helsinki (the Declaration), made in 1964 by the World Medical Association, is also a statement of ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Under the heading of “Informed Consent”, the Declaration starts with the acknowledgement that “Participation by individuals capable of giving informed consent as subjects in medical research must be voluntary”.

[122] Australia is a party to the seven core international human rights treaties, including the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

[123] The Australian Human Right Commission Act 1986 (Cth) gives effect to Australia’s obligations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which provides in Article 7 that “…no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation”.

[124] In 1984, the American Association for the International Commission of Jurists (AAICJ) held an international colloquium in Siracusa, Italy, which was co-sponsored by the International Commission of Jurists. The focus of the colloquium was the limitation and derogation provisions of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the outcome is a document that is referred to as the Siracusa Principles 22.

[125] The introductory note to the Siracusa Principles commences in the following terms:

“It has long been observed by the American Association for the International Commission of Jurists (AAICJ) that one of the main instruments employed by governments to repress and deny the fundamental rights and freedoms of peoples has been the illegal and unwarranted Declaration of Martial Law or a State of Emergency. Very often these measures are taken under the pretext of the existence of a “public emergency which threatens the life of a nation” or “threats to national security”.

The abuse of applicable provisions allowing governments to limit or derogate from certain rights contained in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights has resulted in the need for a closer examination of the conditions and grounds for permissible limitations and derogations in order to achieve an effective implementation of the rule of law. The United Nations General Assembly has frequently emphasised the importance of a uniform interpretation of limitations on rights enunciated in the Covenant.”

[126] Paragraph 58 of the Siracusa Principles under the heading of Non-Derogable Rights provides:

No state party shall, even in time of emergency threatening the life of the nation, derogate from the Covenant’s guarantees of the right to life; freedom from torture, cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, and from medical or scientific experimentation without free consent; freedom from slavery or involuntary servitude; the right not be be imprisoned for contractual debt; the right not to be convicted or sentenced to a heavier penalty by virtue of retroactive criminal legislation; the right to recognition as a person before the law; and freedom of thought, conscience and religion. These rights are not derogable under any conditions even for the asserted purpose of preserving the life of the nation.

[127] This is consistent with Article 4 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

[128] Australia’s National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research 23 confirms that consent is a fundamental requirement for participation in any clinical trial, and that “no person should be subject to coercion or pressure in deciding whether to participate” in a clinical trial. Further, the Australian Government’s Consumer Guide to Clinical Trials24 also confirms that participation in a clinical trial is voluntary, and states “it is important that you never feel forced to take part in a trial”.

She concludes:

[180] The statements by politicians that those who are not vaccinated are a threat to public health and should be “locked out of society” and denied the ability to work are not measures to protect public health. They are not about public health and not justified because they do not address the actual risk of COVID. These measures can only be about punishing those who choose not to be vaccinated. If the purpose of the PHOs is genuinely to reduce the spread of COVID, there is no basis for locking out people who do not have COVID, which is easily established by a rapid antigen test. Conversely, a vaccinated person who contracts COVID should be required to isolate until such time as they have recovered.

[181] Blanket rules, such as mandating vaccinations for everyone across a whole profession or industry regardless of the actual risk, fail the tests of proportionality, necessity and reasonableness. It is more than the absolute minimum necessary to combat the crisis and cannot be justified on health grounds. It is a lazy and fundamentally flawed approach to risk management and should be soundly rejected by courts when challenged.

[182] All Australians should vigorously oppose the introduction of a system of medical apartheid and segregation in Australia. It is an abhorrent concept and is morally and ethically wrong, and the anthesis of our democratic way of life and everything we value.

[183] Australians should also vigorously oppose the ongoing censorship of any views that question the current policies regarding COVID. Science is no longer science if a person is not allowed to question it.

[184] Finally, all Australians, including those who hold or are suspected of holding “anti-vaccination sentiments”, are entitled to the protection of our laws, including the protections afforded by the Fair Work Act. In this regard, one can only hope that the Majority Decision is recognised as an anomaly and not followed by others.

Please read her entire statement. It is powerful stuff indeed. No one who is committed to ethical and legal uprightness can possibly support this latest tyrannical mandate from Australia’s most authoritarian ruler. It must be opposed 100 per cent.

[1746 words]

45 Replies to “Resist Tyrannical Forced Injections”

  1. Pharaoh has like in the Bible upped the oppression….Let the people go !

  2. Well said, Bill. The tyrant Dan Andrews has lost his mind. No-one with a semblance of common sense can support this. The arrogance of this man is beyond belief.

    As for those in the wider population who support this kind of thing, I can only wonder if they would still be so enthusiastic if they realised the creation of these powers can easily be used against them for any reason in the future – because, of course, tyrants don’t stop doing tyrannical things, they just keep ratcheting up the conditions. That they keep believing ‘if we just do the right thing, it will be OK’ is astonishing.

    I look forward for the day this man – and all those in authority going along with this – face justice.

  3. Yes Bill I have just had this ultimatum from the Andrews government presented to me this afternoon. Just as well our God is the way maker and miracle worker as we stand firm on the convictions God had placed in our hearts.

    Your work is a real blessing to me every day and I knew you would have our backs today.
    Thank you Bill

  4. What next will Chairman Dan try to take away from us? I pity his children

  5. I am so sick of the whole thing and how many people are working as useful idiots to further the cause, while principled people lose their jobs and livelihood.

  6. Summary of Toxic Thursday Report

    Note: 850 reports of myocarditis/pericarditis – mainly in young people.

    Summary – to 2609/21 COVID-19 vaccine weekly safety report – 30-09-2021 | Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA)

    564 post vaxx death reports

    64,293 serious injuries – 2555 in one week

    Thrombosis with thrombocytopenia 148 reports – 7 reports this week

    Reports of Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) – TGA states they have 75 reports of ITP to 26 Sept which is very odd as last week’s total was 77 reports of Immune Thrombocytopenia after AZ

    129 reports of Guillain Barre syndrome (paralysis)

    850 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis have been received –

    The new Spikevax (Moderna) has already 5 reports of serious direct effects.
    The TGA ‘continues to monitor’ …

  7. How long before DD comes for me as a pensioner? At least the pension is from the federal government. But how about free rail travel and other state-granted pensioner benefits?

  8. Andrews has also declared more than once that the unvaccinated will be cut out of participating in the economy. We won’t be allowed into cafes, restaurants, theatres, hairdressers, or even shops. We won’t be allowed to buy the necessities for daily living. I think he’d like this to include medical facilities too. So being pensioners won’t avail us much protection. I can’t understand how the prime minister and the federal government can just sit back and let this happen. Please explain!

  9. I wish I were on the pension… I just started a new career that I worked so hard to get and now I have to get a vaccine to keep working. My family is hurting sometimes with this lockdown.
    I would like to know if there is any legal avenue in which I would avoid this vaccine. 10 years ago I suffered pericarditis due to an accident and the vaccine could trigger this again.

  10. “Christine Crawford
    Oct 1, 2021 at 10:30 pm
    What next will Chairman Dan try to take away from us? I pity his children”

    Children could be next. Being unvaxxed could be declared a danger to children.

    “you have a choice” That’s like a man with a knife at a woman’s throat saying you can consent to sex or I can rape you it is your choice. Then society saying hey you chose rape so quit complaining.

  11. Well said Bill!
    And well said by Lyndall Dean.
    I gather from a post on the Reignite Democracy website that included among “essential workers” are all “faith leaders”. This is astonishing for two reasons:
    1. All through these lockdown we have been told very firmly that church services are deemed “non-essential;, and on a par with entertainment (alas, that unfortunately is what all too many services are these days!). All this time brothels and liquor stores have been open as they are deemed essential, but church services not so. Yet now we are told that “faith leaders” are essential workers and must have the jab. Go figure!

    2. Again, we have here an unwarranted intrusion by the state into the affairs of Christ’s church. Are Christ and His church subject to the rulers of this world, or is it the other way around? Cf. Rev.1:5.
    Caesar simply has no jurisdiction in the affairs of Christ’s church, but here we have a situation which Romans 13 does not address, and where it does not apply. Christ gives the edicts for His church (which is where the so-called 7 letters come in), not Caesar, not Dan Andrews, not Joe Biden—not anyone.

  12. It seems to me that one point has been overlooked. That is, known, effective and cheap treatments have been successfully used by good physicians since the early days of this introduced disease (not pandemic).

    No vaccine can ever be mandatory if there are effective treatments available. This is why effective treatments like ivermectin have been demonised.

    Also QR ‘tracing’ (surveillance) is completely irrational as the number of true cases are less than the flu, there are effective treatments and asymptomatic infection is rare in the extreme if non existent. I have heard however that those vaccinated may spread infection asymptomatically which is a major concern.

    This cannot prevail if we band together and do not give in!
    write to local retailers and give the above information and ask they drop QR surveillance.
    Riccardo Bosi has written to the Governor General (- see and flood him with complaints.

  13. Just shows how our society has changed. I remember the uproar when Hawke and Keating wanted to introduce the Australia Card. Now barely a whimper and in fact outright cheering on these draconian measures.
    Thanks Bill for your brave commentary on these matters.
    Unfortunately, for many, if it is a choice between feeding your family or not.

  14. Hi Bill, as Christian believers we need to put our case forward for a Religious Exemption. I know of someone in the US who has had approval granted based on their pro life beliefs as a Christian and stating that the vaccine’s link with aborted fetal cells conflicts with their faith views. This will be the path I will choose if faced with a similar ultimatum.

  15. Thank you Bill. I would ask what planet the other people on the Fair Work Commission are on? Andrew’s behaviour is bizarre and where are the rest of the Victorian Labor Party? Surely they can see something’s wrong with him?

  16. Victorians will comply and remain docile just as they have done for 20 months. The real epidemic in Australia is gullibility which Australia is now the epicenter of. Australians do everything their masters tell them.

    A proposal has been made by Liberal NSW government to tie in working with children checks with vaccination. So they want no vaccine no working with children check. This will mean all teachers, counselors, youth workers, church ministers, chaplains, sports coaches, volunteers and more will be mandated to have it.

  17. Matthew M, keep watching, listening and reading about the Sydney Supreme County case. Day 3 will be on Tuesday 5 October.
    On day 1, the Plaintiffs Lawyer, after cross examining the defense Professor and Doctor, summarised saying “vaccines don’t protect, are highly transmissible, lack of effectiveness, reinfect, are an experiment, and lack of concern over safety”.
    At end of day two, the Plaintiff Lawyer summarised saying “mandates are in breech, should be found invalid and prohibition to medical conscription without informed concent”.
    Please keep praying for the Plaintiff Lawyers as 4 cases before the Judge. Tuesday will be a full day. It can be watch live and highly recommend as that shows public interest.

  18. James Allan’s piece in the Weekend Australian is excellent: “Covid hysteria built on ignorance, propaganda and incompetence”. In fact it’s so good I’m surprised it was published! Maybe I am becoming paranoid.

  19. Thanks Bill. It was accessible to me. But here is a short quote from it:

    Meanwhile, a number of British doctors are now predicting that deaths caused by the lockdowns themselves will end up outnumbering the saved Covid deaths by 10 or 20 to 1. And this in a world where the median age of Covid deaths is higher than the country’s average life expectancy for men and for women.

    It’s a world where (according to the latest Stanford study) the survival rate for the unvaccinated for these age ranges is: 0-19 (99.9973 per cent); 20-29 (99.986 per cent); 30-39 (99.969 per cent); 40-49 (99.918 per cent); and the survival rate doesn’t drop below 99.7 per cent until you get to the over-70s.

    In a world with that sort of risk of dying from Covid, if you are under 70 why would you care in the slightest if someone else chooses not to get vaccinated? You started with those great odds and improved them by getting vaccinated yourself. Give anyone under 75 a choice of whether to get Covid or cancer, heart disease or diabetes, and you’re an idiot if you don’t pick Covid.

  20. Very impressive quote from James Allan.

    This enforced vaccination doesn’t really save lives at all, according to that evidence! The relatively few deaths for younger people is worth noting, especially for age < 70.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *