CultureWatch

Bill Muehlenberg's commentary on issues of the day...

More Gender Bender Madness

Dec 16, 2016

If you are looking for a sure-fire way to destroy a culture, the gender bender moonbeams seem to have found the perfect solution. They have declared war on just about everything: reality, biology, gender, language, reason, logic and common sense.

Everywhere we turn we find their destructive agenda being unleashed on hapless populations throughout the West. What the Marxists could not accomplish with tanks and bombs, the cultural Marxists and the gender anarchists are accomplishing with politically correct madness.

trans-51And it is frightening to behold. I have reported on dozens of examples of this over the past few years, including their diabolical war on language. It has gotten so out of hand that simply calling someone by the “wrong pronoun” is now almost a capital offence. Consider just two more recent cases of this lunacy.

In the UK we have Oxford University telling its students to refer to each other with “gender neutral pronouns” such as “ze,” instead of he or she, so that no one gets “offended”. Poor little buttercups. We sure don’t want to hurt their precious feelings now do we?

A few generations ago young men and women were sacrificing everything, dying on fields of battle to protect our freedoms. But now these delicate snowflakes are seeking to deconstruct reality so that their feelings do not get upset. Wow.

So we have gotten to the place where gender is now something completely of our own choosing. If I choose to self-identify as a female, black, three-legged alpaca, well, that is who I am, and no one can tell me otherwise. And you better embrace me for who I am, or I will send the gender bender thought police after you.

This gender craziness simply keeps getting worse by the day. As a recent piece from Christian Voice put it:

So, just how many new genders are there? According to a recent count on the website Tumblr, which is the home of the online feminist, there are over 400 gender options now to choose from. From the more popular ‘genderqueer’ and ‘genderfluid’, to far more obscure options, all are to be accepted without question, unless one wishes to be called ‘transphobic’ or ‘transmisogynist’. These options aren’t mutually exclusive either, so one can choose to identify with more than one of these new ‘genders’.

Yep, let’s just make all this up as we go along. Indeed, forget the alpaca nonsense. I now identify as a Simpson top loader 6.5Kg capacity heavy duty washing machine, model number 225-650k. I am 15 years old and still running well. If anyone is in need of a good wash, come on over to my place and we can make some magic together.

But in the Australian state with the worst case of moral and mental constipation – the People’s Republik of Victoria – the nutjob lefties and the gender police of the Dan Andrews’ government are at it yet again. Not a day goes by when these lunar radicals are not offering up some new imbecility to foist upon hapless Victorian residents.

Now they are telling us to stop calling spouses ‘husband’ and ‘wife’. Yes you read that right. As one newspaper report states:

Victorian government workers are being discouraged from using “heteronormative” terms such as “husband” and “wife” in a new guide to communicating with the LGBTI community. Instead, the workers are being schooled in adopting gender-neutral pronouns “zie” and “hir”.
The Inclusive Language Guide, which has been designed for use across the public sector, also warns against derogatory terms, such as “dyke” and “fag”, as well as “offensive questions”, including asking a transgender person whether or not they have had surgery.
In his introduction to the guide, Victorian Equality Minister Martin Foley says the government’s responsibility is to keep people safe, including the LGBTI community. “The guide is one of the ways in which we are addressing and eradicating homophobia, biphobia and transphobia,” he says. Ro Allen, the state’s first gender and sexuality commissioner, encourages businesses also to use of the guide, saying that equipping people with correct language will “promote safer spaces” for LGBTI Victorians.

Dan and his Labor buddies obviously have far too much free time on their hands since they keep coming up with all this utter lunacy. Every idiotic, anti-Christian, anti-family, and anti-life agenda item you can imagine seems to have been put forward by this hyper-left government.

Thankfully not everyone thought this latest bit of PC moonbattery was a great idea. For example, Opposition spokesman Tim Smith said this:

People should be respectful to everyone regardless of gender, religion, ethnicity, sexuality and appearance, but once again Daniel Andrews is dividing people with his over the top ideological nonsense. Victorians are being swamped by a violent crime wave and skyrocketing electricity bills but Daniel Andrews is focused on people using heteronormative terms such as ‘husband’ and ‘wife’. This isn’t just creating unnecessary division it’s also a frightening waste of taxpayers’ money when respect and common sense is what’s needed.

Jeremy Sammut of the Centre for Independent Studies was also not very impressed: “It’s a totalitarian project dressed up as liberation theory. I would think it is possible to treat people with respect and respect people’s privacy without resorting to this.”

And Rachel Carling-Jenkins, DLP member of the Victorian Legislative Council, put it this way on social media:

The bitter Left is at war with our culture, so much so that they now want to stop us using the words “husband” or “wife” in the workplace in case we offend someone. I ask, what is so wrong with a culture built upon individual freedoms, equality under the law, and the family unit?
The culture change being sought is one of “tolerance” and “respect”, in which your freedoms are suppressed by the totalitarian instinct of the bitter Left, through a government that instructs you on what you’re allowed to believe, what you’re allowed to say, and how you’re allowed to say it. Dumb, dumber, dumbest? Ordinary folk know this is nonsense.

Yes there is a whole lotta dumb going on around here. The old saying about “Whom the gods would destroy, they first make mad,” seems to be completely at work here. These loony coercive utopians are destroying everything in their path, and they are doing so by use of some of the most inane and idiotic means possible.

Heaven help us.

www.independent.co.uk/student/news/oxford-university-students-gender-neutral-pronouns-peter-tatchell-student-union-ze-xe-a7470196.html
www.christianvoice.org.uk/index.php/gender-neutral-pronouns-at-oxford/
www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/state-politics/husband-wife-now-off-limits-says-public-service-guide/news-story/a561abf209b1e25b4d0d2dd3fc909d63
www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victoria/victorian-government-encouraging-workers-not-to-use-wife-husband/news-story/ed4f867696ae3bdd36d3f2f477a7fd6e?nk=b6817488bb556896ab732d6a901a851f-1481857494

[1061 words]

12 Responses to More Gender Bender Madness

  • I figure if the issue comes up, I’ll fall around laughing and say “what’s up ma…a…t..e?!!”

  • PC sword needs to clash with the Sword of the spoken Spirit of truth.
    Scripture needs to be spoken (truth).
    Gods spoken word needs to be broadcast in all areas of our nation.
    Pure word of truth.
    Thanks to those speaking up. Telling Gods truth to those around.

  • Would it be a encephalitophobic crime to ask Victorian Equality Minister Martin Foley if he has had a complete lobotomy or simply a brain transplant with a jerboa?

    If it is the latter he will have to burrow underground during the day to avoid daylight, reality reason, logic and common sense which would be fatal for him.

    www.youtube.com/watch?v=FnnB_pYq9kg

    David Skinner UK

  • The homosexual Stephen Fry would also make it a bipolarphobic crime to stigmatise bipolarphiles, like himself [1]and for this he would prescribe being sectioned in a mental institute [2] until we all become like him.
    [1] www.youtube.com/watch?v=uj8hqXd7N_A
    [2] www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0jgg_4ELv8

    David Skinner UK

  • Sorry, I put up the wrong link with regard to Stephen Fry saying the problem of mental illness, like bipolar disorder – ( or even paedophilia and necrophilia?), lay not with him but with the general public who needed treatment to overcome stigma.

    www.youtube.com/watch?v=nCJr1HIygVs

    David Skinner UK

  • Forcing the public to accept transsexuality as normal highlights perhaps more than anything else -more than sexual perversion, moral corruption, the spreading of sexually transmitted diseases and the break up of marriage and family – the evils of decriminalising homosexuality in the late 1960s without the proper restrictions.

    The real evil is that it gives a tiny minority of disturbed degenerates the power to force the public, without a shred of scientific evidence, to accept myths, propaganda, hoaxes, fraud and lies as a scientific fact, in the same way the German population had to accept the myth of the Aryan Master race, through intimidation, threats, fines, arrests, concentration camp and the gas chamber On this one aspect alone, forcing a whole nation to accept lies, immorality and unreality is a crime against humanity.
    We have been here before.
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXtC08tWxqA

    David Skinner UK

  • Wonderful article … scarily true threat to us all!!

  • It’s chilling to watch clever people who care about the truth and checking the veracity of their sources having to work twice as hard as those lazy people who self-determine the truth, getting their information from social media group-think on a ‘might makes right’ and the ‘end justifies the means’ bullying sort of way. The truth will out in the end and the blatant liars will take a tumble.

  • @David Skinner UK
    Thank you for your well researched, insightful and always excellent comments. Transsexuality is a delusional fantasy. It is impossible for a man to not-be a man, no matter what clothes he wears, no matter how he mutilates his bodily manhood. The LGBTIQ dictators are waging war on the self-evident. As John Locke (1632-1704) wrote, rejecting the self-evident is to:–

    put ourselves in the power of the Prince of Darkness, and, by our own consent, to give ourselves up to delusion to believe a lie. For, if strength of persuasion be the light which must guide us; I ask how shall any one distinguish between the delusions of Satan, and the inspirations of the Holy Ghost? Satan can transform himself into an angel of light. And they who are led by this Son of the Morning are as…strongly persuaded that they are enlightened by the Spirit of God as any one who [actually] is so: they acquiesce and rejoice in [the delusion], and are actuated by it: and nobody can be more sure, nor more in the right (if their own belief may be judge) than they. (Essay concerning Human Understanding, 4.19.13)

    Transsexuality is Satan mocking the one-flesh union of marriage. A transsexual ‘man’ clothes his genitals with women’s underwear; a married man puts his wife’s underwear aside, and clothes himself with her body, becoming one flesh with her. The man’s manhood fills the woman’s womanhood, while the latter consumes (hence ‘consummate’) the former. A man’s penis and a woman’s vagina are the opposite of each other, hence the phrase “the opposite sex”. It is impossible for one person to become a member of the opposite sex; in marriage, it is necessary for two persons of the opposite sexes to use their opposite members to become one flesh with each other.

  • That is why we need to really need to resist the feminist/LGBT movement and not give them any ground at all whatsoever.

    One way to give them ground is to fight islam on the basis of how its ‘treats’ women, homosexuals, and other sexual deviants. Rather, islam should be resisted because it is anti-christ, anti-God, and anti-church, and violent, and murderous. This all leads to the mistreatment of all people who they deem to be of a lower class, that is, anyone who is not an elite religious leader in islam, not just the pet groups of the west, such as ‘women and LGBT deviants’.

  • What they don’t understand is that not using the terms, “husband” or “wife” is deeply offensive. Calling someone’s husband or wife a “partner” implies that you don’t think they are married, or you don’t think it matters.

Leave a Reply